2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

camber question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 1, 2011 | 03:50 AM
  #1  
team510fc3s's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
From: oakland
camber question

hi guys and girls, i have a question that i thought you guys could answer about negitive camber. So I recently put coilovers on my 89 fc and now my rear tires have too much negitive camber. What part do i need to correct this?
there is this from awr

http://store.awrracing.com/products/...-RX%252d7.html

and from ground control there is this

http://www.ground-control-store.com/...p/II=156/CA=87

one is a camber link and one is a camber kit, and im not too sure which one i need.
Attached Thumbnails camber question-280512_1930790758113_1492571526_31778103_7551291_o.jpg  
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2011 | 03:51 AM
  #2  
team510fc3s's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
From: oakland
its hard to see but theres a pretty good amount of negitive camber that cant really be seen in the pic
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2011 | 04:47 AM
  #3  
monkey1911's Avatar
Full Member
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
From: Lakewood, WA
Both parts will correct the camber in the rear. Get the camber link first and if that won't pull enough out then get the AWR camber kit. Or just say screw it and get both to begin with.
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2011 | 09:32 AM
  #4  
sharingan 19's Avatar
Rotary Revolutionary
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 3,881
Likes: 3
From: Jacksonville, Tampa & Tallahassee
Thanks for actually doing a little research and asking a semi-informed question, the forum appreciates it.

Further research would have revealed that the single adjuster is good for removing most negative camber however because ut is off-center it does not it does not adjust camber evenly side to side. This is where the kit comes in, they can be used to even out camber left to right. The one drawback of the kit is that they have been known to break if they are used as the sile source of camber adjustment. If you never drive hard this may be a non issue, but even even auto-x has been enough to break them.
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2011 | 01:08 PM
  #5  
team510fc3s's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
From: oakland
okay cool, i guess ill go with the link first and see if it can pull enough out for my liking and than if i need more go with the kit, thanks for the info guys!
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2011 | 02:53 PM
  #6  
anarchyb52's Avatar
Full Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 213
Likes: 0
From: L town Indiana
If the car isnt being drifted the negative camber in the rear could be considered a good thing. Alot of cars are running between -1 to -3 camber to gain better stability. Look at most track prepped time attack cars. They almost always run around -3 camber for better grip in corners. So if you get the camber link and get the camber to around -1 to -2 I think it would still be good to go for daily driving and track days. If your drifting you could get both kits and get the camber completely out. Correct me if I am wrong but doesnt the rx7 have around -1 degree camber from the factory?
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2011 | 10:55 PM
  #7  
DeaconBlue's Avatar
Living on the North Coast
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 600
Likes: 7
From: Avon Lake
With my completely rebuilt rear suspension and Eibach springs I have -1.7 degree of rear camber. In a stock n/a car that is okay. But if I was trying to put +300wHP and matching torque to the ground with say a 255 or 275 rear tires, I would find a way to dial out most of this to maximize the rear tire contact patch width to help put the power to the pavement and improve tread wear.
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2011 | 09:15 AM
  #8  
joe88convertable's Avatar
Junior Member
Tenured Member: 10 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
From: new york
thats only like 2.5degrees of camber. the problem is theres not enough:p
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2012 | 11:32 PM
  #9  
dll's Avatar
dll
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
From: Moscow, Russia
what cheaper camber kits is on sale?

Or how much i must cut stock links and weld it to reduce camber from -2,5 to 0
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2012 | 11:04 AM
  #10  
ColinShark's Avatar
RX-7 Old Timer
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 321
Likes: 10
From: Ann Arbor, MI
The trailing arm design gains some decent camber on compression. You don't need very much static camber in the rear.

The front needs static camber because the struts don't gain camber on compression.
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2012 | 11:22 AM
  #11  
JerryLH3's Avatar
Rabbit hole specialist
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Community Favorite
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,852
Likes: 225
From: Tampa, FL
Originally Posted by dll
what cheaper camber kits is on sale?

Or how much i must cut stock links and weld it to reduce camber from -2,5 to 0
Every car will be different. Cutting it to a specific link will most likely not work. The length that camber link needs to be depends on how dropped your car is, suspension compliance, etc. There is no rule for x length gives y camber.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
_Tones_
Adaptronic Engine Mgmt - AUS
10
May 25, 2021 05:37 AM
rx7jocke
Suspension/Wheels/Tires/Brakes
72
Jun 17, 2016 03:48 AM
Nosferatu
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
7
Sep 5, 2015 02:13 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:37 PM.