Building a autox car
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Building a autox car
Would you start with a SE for the light weight and upgrade to 5 lug and 4 wheel disc or start with a GXL and strip it down as much as possible?
#2
If you start stripping the car down you will end up in F Prepared. I started with a TII chassis and put a carbed N/A engine in it with the proper flywheel. If the car is going to be trailered to events the the GXL model is fine. You'll want to remove the entire interior so the sunroof assembly can come out also.
If you don't want to strip the car then run and SE model in a stock class. If you upgrade to the 5-lug suspension the its off to CSP.
No matter where you run your car you will need a SoloII rule book before you start making changes to your car. Read it and learn all about the class your interested in.
If you don't want to strip the car then run and SE model in a stock class. If you upgrade to the 5-lug suspension the its off to CSP.
No matter where you run your car you will need a SoloII rule book before you start making changes to your car. Read it and learn all about the class your interested in.
#3
Full Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: kittery, maine
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
the se has four wheel disc breaks. also the phone dial wheels on the se's only weigh 11 pounds a peice. i don't know about the gxl's but i know the se's don't have limited slip though.
#4
Senior Member
Thread Starter
It is going to be csp anyways. I am adding new springs, shock, intake, exhaust, ect. I run it now with my daily driver and i want to park it and trailer a race only car.
#5
Senior Member
Thread Starter
My thoughts were centered around a SE have a manual streering rack and less weight. The rule book allow some provisions to update a car with same model year parts, so I would swap the rearend for a limited slip with the five lug change.
Trending Topics
#8
Full Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: kittery, maine
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
everything is bigger on the 5 bolt setup, and i guess it is have to make the conversion. I can''t really remember what was so hard about it. But i posted it on this forum, and everyone told me it was a lot of work.
#9
Has been.. hangin' around
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Milpitas, CA
Posts: 2,618
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You just need the parts, no fab required.
Go SE and add the goodies, weight is a penalty you can't fix, but you can always add the go fast stuff legally.
PauLC
Go SE and add the goodies, weight is a penalty you can't fix, but you can always add the go fast stuff legally.
PauLC
#10
Silkworm is right you only need the parts but you need the correct parts. Don't get TII pieces. Maybe that's what hyperdaddy is thinking about. The driveshafts don't mix and match so there is some fabricating involved with that.
#11
Senior Member
Thread Starter
I just taked with Mazsport here in tampa and they said go with the SE and swap the brakes and rear end, due to the fact that I know where a gxl parts car is and I can get the parts for a few hunderd bucks. They were very helpful and sounds like they are doing some cool stuff there like a n/a to TII swap for a customer and well as lots of scca cars.
#13
Rotary Enthusiast
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 958
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Get an 86-88 Base car, without a sunroof, less weight, then depending on the class you want, can swap the suspension, and brakes.
I'm building a CSP car with that mentiality in mind.
I'm building a CSP car with that mentiality in mind.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
immanuel__7
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
89
09-05-15 10:23 AM
rx8volks
Canadian Forum
0
08-11-15 10:30 PM