2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

Bsfc

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 23, 2003 | 08:54 PM
  #1  
nonameo's Avatar
Thread Starter
**-P I drive a miata.
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,600
Likes: 0
From: albany, GA
Bsfc

what bsfc #'s are you turbo guys seeing and on what setups?
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2003 | 01:57 AM
  #2  
nonameo's Avatar
Thread Starter
**-P I drive a miata.
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,600
Likes: 0
From: albany, GA
anyone?
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2003 | 02:19 AM
  #3  
I wish I was driving!
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 5,241
Likes: 84
From: BC, Canada
No one knows what you are talking about.

He means Brake specific fuel consumption. It is the amount of fuel in lbs/hour that an engine will use for every horsepower, as far as I understand it.

I don't think any RX-7 owner cares. We know we get less hp/volume of fuel than a piston equivalent; this is the nature of the rotary.

Edit: A/F ratio numbers will give you a better indication of the information you're after, and they are far more widley available. We generally aim for A/R ratios of 11.5-11.7 for safe, street tuning, which is a BSFC of around .67 I believe

Last edited by scathcart; Feb 24, 2003 at 02:29 AM.
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2003 | 02:32 AM
  #4  
I wish I was driving!
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 5,241
Likes: 84
From: BC, Canada
Yeah, we are generally seeing BSFC's of 0.64-0.67.

Hope this helps.

Why do you ask?

(Don't compare to other cars... it'll make us look bad. I know DSM's see them between 0.55 and 0.58, and as low as 0.50.)

As a comparison, the best you could hope for (I believe) is 0.40.
0.60 is considered "not good".
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2003 | 02:44 AM
  #5  
nonameo's Avatar
Thread Starter
**-P I drive a miata.
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,600
Likes: 0
From: albany, GA
Trying to find out the real #'s behind how much load the stock fuel injectors can take. I would rather see a real calculation than take someone's word for it. Stock fuel pressure is 35 PSI, right?
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2003 | 02:58 AM
  #6  
I wish I was driving!
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 5,241
Likes: 84
From: BC, Canada
Originally posted by nonameo
Trying to find out the real #'s behind how much load the stock fuel injectors can take. I would rather see a real calculation than take someone's word for it. Stock fuel pressure is 35 PSI, right?
39-40 is a closer number at WOT.


As for not taking my word, it's up to you. You might notice no one else has piped up....
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2003 | 03:09 AM
  #7  
nonameo's Avatar
Thread Starter
**-P I drive a miata.
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,600
Likes: 0
From: albany, GA
not your word in particular, its just that numbers make me feel all warm and fuzzy inside.

EDIT: water injection would reduce the fuel consumption #'s right?
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2003 | 03:15 AM
  #8  
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 145
Likes: 2
From: Irvine, California
ya, water injection would allow you to run leaner, thus giving lower #'s
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2003 | 03:29 AM
  #9  
nonameo's Avatar
Thread Starter
**-P I drive a miata.
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,600
Likes: 0
From: albany, GA
yay. I think I am going to do water injection. Sounds like fun anyways.
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2003 | 04:24 AM
  #10  
HeffBoost's Avatar
Keep Right Except to Pass
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 984
Likes: 1
From: Seattle
Here's a calculator. http://www.rceng.com/technical.htm
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2003 | 04:30 AM
  #11  
nonameo's Avatar
Thread Starter
**-P I drive a miata.
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,600
Likes: 0
From: albany, GA
That's what I have been using. Thanks though.
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2003 | 01:52 PM
  #12  
RETed's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 22
From: n
Use "0.70" - you don't need an exact number, and it's better to be on the safer side.



-Ted
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2003 | 07:35 AM
  #13  
HeffBoost's Avatar
Keep Right Except to Pass
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 984
Likes: 1
From: Seattle
I'm getting 0.74 & 0.78 using 45 & 50# fuel pressure and I've got dyno #s to base it on. Stock injectors & I'm guessing at my fuel pressure. Also using 15% drivetrain loss to work backward from the 200 to the wheels #. This was a Mustang dyno, so if you want to put it into Dynojet terms, add 10%. Then my bsfc #s are 0.67 & 0.71. For what it's worth.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Viking War Hammer
Alternative Fuels
20
Jul 17, 2009 02:49 PM
patman
Rotary Car Performance
4
Feb 15, 2005 06:22 PM
Infini IV
Single Turbo RX-7's
9
Jan 23, 2004 04:45 PM
skotx
Power FC Forum
4
Jun 1, 2003 11:15 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:21 AM.