2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

best offset for fc's?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 11, 2010 | 05:16 PM
  #1  
koke0319's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
From: 3two3
best offset for fc's?

so what woud be the best offset to run on my fc to look FLUSH? post sum pics so i can see... thanks everybody!
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2010 | 05:42 PM
  #2  
need RX7's Avatar
Listen to King Diamond.
Tenured Member: 15 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,859
Likes: 13
From: Sterling Heights, MI
Depends on the width of the wheel. And your definition of 'flush' (truly flush, sticking out with tons of camber, etc...).

But the width of the rim has to be known before anything can happen. All stock FC wheels are +40, for reference. http://www.1010tires.com/WheelOffsetCalculator.asp
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2010 | 09:53 PM
  #3  
RotaryPicha's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 564
Likes: 1
From: Charlotte
Yeah I got 17x7 with an offset +42 and it hit the front springs. I've seen some 17x8 with +35 and they look flush
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2010 | 10:04 PM
  #4  
rotorkid's Avatar
A jug fills drop by drop.
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 354
Likes: 0
From: 661
I'm running 17x7 +30 with 225s and its flush And with how low I am right now with my dampiners turned down it rubs pretty bad on my tires so I need to do just a little fender roll
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2010 | 10:17 PM
  #5  
Natey's Avatar
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,496
Likes: 1,484
From: West Coast
Originally Posted by RotaryPicha
Yeah I got 17x7 with an offset +42 and it hit the front springs. I've seen some 17x8 with +35 and they look flush
17x8 +35 is near OEM fitment. You'll need more offset for flushness.
Here's my old FC on 17x8 and 9, +35 all around. Tires are 235 and 245/40
Attached Thumbnails best offset for fc's?-hks_side.jpg  
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2010 | 01:28 AM
  #6  
GregW's Avatar
~!@#$%^&*()_+
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 461
Likes: 0
From: Mpls, MN
I am very happy with 17X8 front and 17X9 back, both +35

Sorry, no pics.
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2010 | 01:33 AM
  #7  
championadrien's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 900
Likes: 8
From: Fort Walton Beach, FL


17x8 (215/45) + 22,

17x9 (245/45) + 27.

Not camber'd on purpose, just natural camber from lowering springs. I actually want the back to stick out more. Probably gonna go 225/45 - 255/45 when i can afford it =D
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2010 | 01:59 AM
  #8  
RotaryEvolution's Avatar
Sharp Claws
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,107
Likes: 50
From: Central Florida
i have +36 18X8.5F (235/35R18) 18X9.5R (285/35R18, now they are 275width but still fit the same)

don't have pics but they are flush with minimal rubbing w/o flaring.
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2010 | 02:03 AM
  #9  
Brody8877's Avatar
#FakeCarEnthusaist
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,817
Likes: 10
From: San Francisco
fitting without rolling fenders:

http://fc3spro.com/TECH/MODS/RT/rims.htm
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2010 | 02:06 AM
  #10  
RotaryEvolution's Avatar
Sharp Claws
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,107
Likes: 50
From: Central Florida
i call BS on ted's writeup or my car is just roomy in the wheel wells for some odd reason.. everyone seems to claim FCs can't fit a 285, which is also false.
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2010 | 02:09 AM
  #11  
Brody8877's Avatar
#FakeCarEnthusaist
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,817
Likes: 10
From: San Francisco
Originally Posted by Karack
i call BS on ted's writeup or my car is just roomy in the wheel wells for some odd reason.. everyone seems to claim FCs can't fit a 285, which is also false.
im running 255 on the rear of my fc, my tires are actually tucking under the fender well so I don't know. The Front 17x8 + 35 on 225 im sitting kinda flush, but im running like -0.75 camber in the front.
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2010 | 02:11 AM
  #12  
RotaryEvolution's Avatar
Sharp Claws
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,107
Likes: 50
From: Central Florida
there is obviously some fitment issues in the front but that is mainly due to the width of the coil springs. coilovers are the best thing i could have done to get some more meat under the car.
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2010 | 02:16 AM
  #13  
Brody8877's Avatar
#FakeCarEnthusaist
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,817
Likes: 10
From: San Francisco
Originally Posted by Karack
there is obviously some fitment issues in the front but that is mainly due to the width of the coil springs. coilovers are the best thing i could have done to get some more meat under the car.
I am on stance coilovers, I mean I can run more negative camber, but the alignment shop that I brought to re-adjusted my settings. I am seriously thinking about getting a self-alignment kit (water level).
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2010 | 02:42 AM
  #14  
SmogSUX's Avatar
No money. No love.
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,807
Likes: 0
From: SACRAMENTO
Karack's car:




That's all I could find atm
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2010 | 02:44 AM
  #15  
RotaryEvolution's Avatar
Sharp Claws
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,107
Likes: 50
From: Central Florida
doesn't really show the side view ya nerd

but you can see my awesome stock catback!
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2010 | 02:56 AM
  #16  
SmogSUX's Avatar
No money. No love.
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,807
Likes: 0
From: SACRAMENTO
You can kinda tell you aren't Mexiflush.

And I almost didn't want to post that pic. Your car isn't pic worth with that shitty catback. Put the Borla back on!!!
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2010 | 03:23 AM
  #17  
Brody8877's Avatar
#FakeCarEnthusaist
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,817
Likes: 10
From: San Francisco
Originally Posted by SmogSUX
You can kinda tell you aren't Mexiflush.

And I almost didn't want to post that pic. Your car isn't pic worth with that shitty catback. Put the Borla back on!!!
third time i heard this term today
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2010 | 03:30 AM
  #18  
K!NCH's Avatar
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,564
Likes: 26
From: Cincinnati, OH
+24/25 is the lowest I would go without modding fenders or getting over fenders.

You can fit a 9" wheel all around.
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2010 | 06:39 AM
  #19  
clokker's Avatar
Cake or Death?
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,249
Likes: 64
From: Mile High
17 x 8, +20 with 235/45 fits very nicely in the rear, 17 x 8, +30 with the same tire, works in the front.
17 x 9, +30 with a 255/45 also works on the rear.
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2010 | 07:11 AM
  #20  
gxl90rx7's Avatar
destroy, rebuild, repeat
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,991
Likes: 17
From: Charleston, SC
Originally Posted by Karack
there is obviously some fitment issues in the front but that is mainly due to the width of the coil springs. coilovers are the best thing i could have done to get some more meat under the car.
its the opposite with mine, tein flex.. there was more room for the tire with the stock shocks, because the perch was higher. the tein spring is longer and it hits the tire if too wide

im running 16x8 with 31mm offset, 225 tire and there is only about 4mm tire clearance at the coilover. 35 offset would not fit
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2010 | 02:41 AM
  #21  
RotaryEvolution's Avatar
Sharp Claws
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,107
Likes: 50
From: Central Florida
Originally Posted by gxl90rx7
its the opposite with mine, tein flex.. there was more room for the tire with the stock shocks, because the perch was higher. the tein spring is longer and it hits the tire if too wide

im running 16x8 with 31mm offset, 225 tire and there is only about 4mm tire clearance at the coilover. 35 offset would not fit
Tein's have a nice feel to them but their fitment is garbage. i had to reclock my old s-tech springs because they had less clearance than my old OEM's.
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2010 | 08:01 AM
  #22  
sub9lulu's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,739
Likes: 2
From: FL
flush ?
17x10 -20 (thats a negative)

looks flush to me
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2010 | 08:58 AM
  #23  
stevensimon's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,575
Likes: 6
From: salt lake ut
17x8.5 -6 here
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2010 | 01:20 PM
  #24  
airquin23's Avatar
Team U.R.S
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 550
Likes: 0
From: Sacramento
Crown Vic meshies. 16x7 +0 Flush in the front, I needed a 5mm slip on spacer to clear T2 brakes. Rears need like an inch spacer. Thats how I did it. 205/50/16 front. 225/55/16 rear with rolled fenders. If I had smaller tires most likely it would have fit without modifying the fenders so much. Check out the blog in my sig has a big pic of my car.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
doritoloco
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
2
Sep 17, 2015 03:51 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:57 PM.