2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

It aggravates me that my boss's 85 with 182,000 runs as good as my 88 vert

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 8, 2004 | 07:26 PM
  #1  
gentlejax2's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 809
Likes: 0
From: shreveport, La.
It aggravates me that my boss's 85 with 182,000 runs as good as my 88 vert

I am driving my boss's car till I get the title straight with my 88 vert and it seems like the old 85 12A runs as good as my 13b in my vert. It has 182000+ on it on the original motor and it runs pretty good although I know it is not quite as fast as it seems as I notice in 4th gear I am not really going that fast. but compared to my 88 which is running pretty good , it just feels like it runs better.

I have had a 79 & 85 but that was years ago.

just doesnt seem right that the old 85 should even run that good all stock and ugly as hell.....

Mike
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2004 | 07:30 PM
  #2  
gergrx7's Avatar
Boosting Again
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,350
Likes: 1
From: Gainesville, FL
um arent the 84 and 85 1st gens 13b's? or is that jsut the GSL-se's?
and its alot lighter than your hevay vert.
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2004 | 08:02 PM
  #3  
RotaryBuddha's Avatar
CURVE OF CONSTANT WIDTH
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,314
Likes: 1
From: Wesley Chapel, FL
just the gslse was 13b. all others were 12a
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2004 | 08:17 PM
  #4  
Aviator 902S's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,711
Likes: 0
From: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
But even the 12A-powered 1st gens were as quick as the verts. And the SE was faster. True, they have less power, but the verts are so much heavier that they need every one of those extra horses. The zero-to-sixty times between the vert and the 12A are actually very close.

Still, the vert has top-down capabilities, rack&pinion vs. the 1st gen's "wonder steering", fuel injection rather than a 4-barrel carb, and a better brakes/ suspension system. Almost makes the less-attractive body style worth the price of admission. Almost.
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2004 | 11:30 PM
  #5  
vvhitewabbit's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix
Whats wrong with the verts
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2004 | 11:34 PM
  #6  
neofreak's Avatar
accept no imitations™
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,096
Likes: 0
From: san francisco
Maybe his was actually taken care of. Its not like its impossible for an RX-7 to be reliable and run properly.
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2004 | 03:27 AM
  #7  
koukifc3s's Avatar
Clogged cat
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,000
Likes: 0
From: Orange County, CA
Originally posted by neofreak
Maybe his was actually taken care of. Its not like its impossible for an RX-7 to be reliable and run properly.
for real?
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2004 | 03:59 AM
  #8  
1SxyRXy's Avatar
my fc broke
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,231
Likes: 0
From: rohnert park,CA/ bay area
my car has the same features as a 2004 car and my car runs great i have all the options, AC, PS,PW,power dor locks, sun roof and enough power to keep me satisfied
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
astrum
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
24
Nov 15, 2017 08:44 AM
Professorpeanutrx7
New Member RX-7 Technical
5
Aug 15, 2015 01:38 PM
meat_whistle
Introduce yourself
0
Aug 12, 2015 08:41 PM
Wolf_
Single Turbo RX-7's
3
Aug 11, 2015 04:23 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:20 PM.