2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

AFM before or after TURBO which is the proper place and why

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 30, 2008 | 01:53 AM
  #1  
86gxl_fc's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 616
Likes: 1
From: dallas, TX 75228
AFM before or after TURBO which is the proper place and why

is there a reason behind having to mount the afm before the turbo?
i assumed that all the AFM does is measure the air entering the engine.
As long as its mounted flat due to the flap inside opening sideways (like a door).
Before, or after the turbo.. i assumed it would measure the same exact amount of air at either place.
For me, it just seemed more of handy place to put it Right in front of the throttle body, so i'd be able to mount the piping easier.
also, if any piping would just so happen to pop up, it wouldnt affect the drivability since it happens BEFORE the afm, not after the afm.

is there any legit reason to mount the AFM before the turbo?
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2008 | 03:02 AM
  #2  
T24U's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
From: Anchorage, AK
Not really sure why people keep it there. I have heard of people in Japan mounting it into the intercooler system, not sure how exactly, or if any different tuning is required for that, but it would seem like a good idea because then you can just put a filter on the turbo and call it a day..
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2008 | 06:35 AM
  #3  
RotaMan99's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,791
Likes: 0
From: New Hampshire
The AFM should be mounted before the turbo for a more accurate air flow reading.

The reason for this is because when the turbo needs to compress air it needs to consume air and this is what the AFM will measure, how much air the turbo is compressing.

If you put the AFM after the turbo the air is MUCH denser since its more compressed and the AFM is not calibrated for this dense air nor can it comprimise for pressure. You will be running leaner if you put it after the turbo than if you put it before the turbo.

If you have means of tuning the fuel than I wouldn't worry to much about this but if not, keep it before the turbo.
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2008 | 09:17 AM
  #4  
86gxl_fc's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 616
Likes: 1
From: dallas, TX 75228
well i have a Neo AFC that i was planning on using it since i have a pair of 680s on the secondaries anyways.
the only other reason i wouldnt put it before the turbo would be because of the fact that it would run momentarily lean when ever the bov would go off.
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2008 | 09:55 AM
  #5  
RotaMan99's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,791
Likes: 0
From: New Hampshire
IF the BOV opens arn't you releasing the throttle anyways? So going lean would be alright while releasing the throttle....?

I don't know much about turbos systems so I ask more questions than giving answers.
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2008 | 10:21 AM
  #6  
Aaron Cake's Avatar
Engine, Not Motor
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 29,798
Likes: 128
From: London, Ontario, Canada
The AFM can be mounted either way. There is a temperature sensor in the AFM which in theory could be effected by higher intake temps after the turbo but I don't think I've ever heard of someone having issues because of it. It would never be my first choice for mounting (I doubt it's designed to handle that much pressure) but has been done a lot in the past. Very common before standalone systems were cheap.

There is some good evidence that moving the AFM closer to the engine results in better throttle response.
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2008 | 12:09 PM
  #7  
arghx's Avatar
rotorhead
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 16,205
Likes: 461
From: cold
blow-through setups are common on other cars, but mostly ones with a hotwire or Karman vortex type AFM
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2008 | 11:26 PM
  #8  
86gxl_fc's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 616
Likes: 1
From: dallas, TX 75228
so then, to make it a short answer..?
its okay, eitherway.
its purely preference?
i'll be sure to let you guys know if i notice anything fishy from the way this is set up.
thanks for the help guys.
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2008 | 01:30 AM
  #9  
arghx's Avatar
rotorhead
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 16,205
Likes: 461
From: cold
I wouldn't say it's "purely preference." Nobody who responds to your thread has actually done it, so we are speculating about any issues you may encounter. But be advised that the 87-88 AFM is a lot more sensitive to the way it is positioned than the s5 AFM. so you are being a bit of a pioneer here.

personally, I'm not sure what you hope to benefit from this.
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2008 | 04:55 AM
  #10  
Evil Aviator's Avatar
Rotorhead
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 9,136
Likes: 39
From: Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
For best results, mount the AFM in the trash can and use a speed-density standalone EMS. The outdated 1980's method of mounting the AFM after the turbo and adding a separate fuel controller, ignition controller, and boost controller, will also work, but it is not very efficient in performance or economic terms.

Originally Posted by arghx
so you are being a bit of a pioneer here.
No, this was done a long time ago before the standalone EMS was readily available. You are just not familiar with the process because it has been long outdated, just like you are probably not familiar with leaf springs and bias-ply tires, lol.
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2008 | 09:37 AM
  #11  
Aaron Cake's Avatar
Engine, Not Motor
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 29,798
Likes: 128
From: London, Ontario, Canada
Originally Posted by arghx
I wouldn't say it's "purely preference." Nobody who responds to your thread has actually done it, so we are speculating about any issues you may encounter. But be advised that the 87-88 AFM is a lot more sensitive to the way it is positioned than the s5 AFM. so you are being a bit of a pioneer here.
personally, I'm not sure what you hope to benefit from this.
I've been there and done that on a turbo-NA setup before. No issues. Again, not my preference but it was the only choice in that case...
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2008 | 11:53 AM
  #12  
Unseen24-7's Avatar
Card-carrying Rotorhead
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 457
Likes: 0
From: Quebec
Not to thread jack but how critical is it that the AFM be mounted horizontally (either right-side-up or up-side-down)?

Is the S5 AFM a direct swap or would you need to splice some wires to make it work?
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2008 | 08:01 AM
  #13  
RotaMan99's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,791
Likes: 0
From: New Hampshire
86-88 AFMs should be mounted as level as possible either upright or upside down.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2008 | 01:25 PM
  #14  
totallimmortal's Avatar
Is that thing Turbo?
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,411
Likes: 0
From: Maryland
you need to splice wires to get the s5 afm to fit an s4, there is a really simple diagram around somewhere if you interested in this i'll help you look for it (i'm bored). The s4 afm need to be mounted so that the flap door swings like a house door, if you mount it sideways then gravity will affect the door and throw off readings
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2008 | 03:14 PM
  #15  
Loki101's Avatar
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
No, this was done a long time ago before the standalone EMS was readily available. You are just not familiar with the process because it has been long outdated, just like you are probably not familiar with leaf springs and bias-ply tires, lol.[/QUOTE]

Wow you're old. Thats like the flintstones era.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
trickster
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
25
Jul 1, 2023 04:40 PM
Th0m4s
Build Threads
25
Feb 26, 2019 02:04 AM
Frisky Arab
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
13
Aug 18, 2015 05:30 PM
eddierotary
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
4
Aug 16, 2015 04:12 PM
Professorpeanutrx7
New Member RX-7 Technical
5
Aug 15, 2015 01:38 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:53 PM.