aerodynamic flow chart
Thread Starter
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,204
Likes: 1
From: Cincinnati, Oh
http://www.iluvmyrx7.com/2ndgen/pics...es/image33.htm
i cant get it to post a real pic it is just doing a white box with x in it. here is the link.
i cant get it to post a real pic it is just doing a white box with x in it. here is the link.
what do you mean decode it? like tell you what it means?
It means the FC has one of the best aerodynamic flow of ANY mid 80's cars
they are awesome. and umm.. that's about all i know
the hood is a low pressure area, and the rear hatch area acts like a natural wing/spoiler
-Mar (KUS)
It means the FC has one of the best aerodynamic flow of ANY mid 80's cars
they are awesome. and umm.. that's about all i know
the hood is a low pressure area, and the rear hatch area acts like a natural wing/spoiler
-Mar (KUS)
Thread Starter
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,204
Likes: 1
From: Cincinnati, Oh
Ya I would like someone to explain what the arrows pointing up are? Basically, tell me what parts of the cars there is lift and what has downforce from the chart. Also if anyone has any other cars they got charts on we can compare and contrast simularities in body style. Also this chart dosent have a spoiler on the car, does it do much if anything at all on our cars?
Trending Topics
Originally posted by Relisys190
this thing pops up all the time.. man.. that pic is so old.. is it from the design team?
-Markus
this thing pops up all the time.. man.. that pic is so old.. is it from the design team?
-Markus
Vector Quantities 101: The arrows are pressure points. Arrows pointing toward the car are positive pressure, while arrows pointing away from the car are negative pressure. The length of the arrow shaft shows how much pressure.
My favorite part: Note how the shape of a car forms a natural "spoiler" effect acting on the rear deck.
I am guessing the up arrows mean low pressure while the down arrows mean high pressure, relative to atmospheric.
Yep look at the natural spoiler effect of the bare FC fuselage . . oops I mean body. But look at all that negative pressure (lift) coming off the hood.
I think that would cause understeer at high speeds . . well at least that is better than oversteer at 100 knots . . oops I mean MPH. I wonder if a flatter hood would make less lift up front.
Yep look at the natural spoiler effect of the bare FC fuselage . . oops I mean body. But look at all that negative pressure (lift) coming off the hood.
I think that would cause understeer at high speeds . . well at least that is better than oversteer at 100 knots . . oops I mean MPH. I wonder if a flatter hood would make less lift up front.
Last edited by 88IntegraLS; May 22, 2003 at 07:47 PM.
ok so i have a post about pop up hoods so with this chart its basicly saying that air would not escape from the engine bay yet enter it (like a coul induction hood)
https://www.rx7club.com/forum/showth...hreadid=184028
https://www.rx7club.com/forum/showth...hreadid=184028
also so basicly this chart proves the turboII hood is pretty much useless fresh air headlight covers or pretty useless and removing your ftp lenses is also pretty useless then huh. so a coul hood a front mount intercooler and cold air ducts in the nose below or on the stripping would be the best choice for an rx-7
Up to about Mach 0.4, the pressures are going to be pretty much the same, relative to each other (which is what the picture represents, relative differences in pressure). Aside from some slight changes due to movement of the laminar/turbulent transition point, that is, which won't be much even up to 215 mph (flipper speed).
And as the post after yours clarifies, the pressures are increments above or below ambient pressure, not really *positive* or *negative* pressure. I know you already know this stuff; this is just to clarify.
Originally posted by Evil Aviator
I would really like to know what airspeed that picture represents.
Vector Quantities 101: The arrows are pressure points. Arrows pointing toward the car are positive pressure, while arrows pointing away from the car are negative pressure. The length of the arrow shaft shows how much pressure.
I would really like to know what airspeed that picture represents.
Vector Quantities 101: The arrows are pressure points. Arrows pointing toward the car are positive pressure, while arrows pointing away from the car are negative pressure. The length of the arrow shaft shows how much pressure.
Originally posted by Rx-7Blazin
also so basicly this chart proves the turboII hood is pretty much useless ...
also so basicly this chart proves the turboII hood is pretty much useless ...
... fresh air headlight covers or pretty useless and removing your ftp lenses is also pretty useless then huh. so a coul hood a front mount intercooler and cold air ducts in the nose below or on the stripping would be the best choice for an rx-7
Originally posted by SureShot
It shows which way air will flow if a hole was drilled at that spot.
It shows which way air will flow if a hole was drilled at that spot.
On the other hand, maybe I'll get out the Makita (or better yet a sharp punch and a hammer) and put holes all over the car. Dude, I'll have freaking Indy Car downforce!
I also like that natural rocket propulsion effect back by the tail lights. Man, you drill enough holes in the back of your FC, then add some little wings on the doors, you could fly! Hell, then all you need is one of those Frank Germano Tesla Tubine things and, well, ****, you could probably turn yer FC into a freaking TIME MACHINE!
Originally posted by 88IntegraLS
I am guessing the up arrows mean low pressure while the down arrows mean high pressure, relative to atmospheric.
Yep look at the natural spoiler effect of the bare FC fuselage . . oops I mean body. But look at all that negative pressure (lift) coming off the hood.
I think that would cause understeer at high speeds . . well at least that is better than oversteer at 100 knots . . oops I mean MPH. I wonder if a flatter hood would make less lift up front.
I am guessing the up arrows mean low pressure while the down arrows mean high pressure, relative to atmospheric.
Yep look at the natural spoiler effect of the bare FC fuselage . . oops I mean body. But look at all that negative pressure (lift) coming off the hood.
I think that would cause understeer at high speeds . . well at least that is better than oversteer at 100 knots . . oops I mean MPH. I wonder if a flatter hood would make less lift up front.

Yes, there is lift on the nose, but at least there is a lot of force on the chin. The Bonneville salt flats 10AE RX-7 had a simple air dam added to the front to keep the nose down, and that worked just fine up to 191 mph.
BTW, 100 kts = about 115 mph.
Originally posted by Rx-7Blazin
ok so i have a post about pop up hoods so with this chart its basicly saying that air would not escape from the engine bay yet enter it (like a coul induction hood)
ok so i have a post about pop up hoods so with this chart its basicly saying that air would not escape from the engine bay yet enter it (like a coul induction hood)
Do you have two friends? Have one of them drive along next to you on the freeway, while the other one sits in the passenger seat of the other car and takes a picture of your hood with infrared film. That should determine where the heat is going. Just be safe when you do it.
http://rx7.voodoobox.net/infofaq/hotmazda/hot_mazda.htm
Originally posted by Rx-7Blazin
also so basicly this chart proves the turboII hood is pretty much useless fresh air headlight covers or pretty useless and removing your ftp lenses is also pretty useless then huh. so a coul hood a front mount intercooler and cold air ducts in the nose below or on the stripping would be the best choice for an rx-7
also so basicly this chart proves the turboII hood is pretty much useless fresh air headlight covers or pretty useless and removing your ftp lenses is also pretty useless then huh. so a coul hood a front mount intercooler and cold air ducts in the nose below or on the stripping would be the best choice for an rx-7
I have personally tested the TII hood up to 80 mph, and I can assure you that air still goes into the scoop at this speed. One of these days I will also measure the pressure.
Last edited by Evil Aviator; May 22, 2003 at 10:49 PM.
One aerodynamic improvement that seems so obvious to me and I have never seen executed on a 2nd gen is
side strakes for the hood...
If one just made vertical strakes up to the base of the windshield following the fender/hood gap is it would act like a spillway on a wing and keep air from "rolling" off the body and concentrating the high pressure area on the body at the base of the windshield.
Some nice simple CF strakes... Maybe I will be the 1st
side strakes for the hood...
If one just made vertical strakes up to the base of the windshield following the fender/hood gap is it would act like a spillway on a wing and keep air from "rolling" off the body and concentrating the high pressure area on the body at the base of the windshield.
Some nice simple CF strakes... Maybe I will be the 1st
Thread Starter
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,204
Likes: 1
From: Cincinnati, Oh
The Turbo II hood scoops would definately change all the aerodynamic charistics of the hood. The downdoce that happens right before the windshield would be moved farthe down the hood with the scoop.
If you notice, those are all basically vectors that are all perpindicular to the body at various points. They point in for poitive pressure on the body, basically, the force that the air produces on that point has been made into a vector showing its weight perpindicular. In the areas such as the tail where they are point out this is slight negative pressure where the air will not really be pushing but pulling slightly. doeas this make any sense to you guys? The arror are large at the beginnning because the force the air is large, then they grow smaller because the air start to move along the body rather than impacting it. then just below the wind shield its not impacting at all, in fact it almost has to dip down, but it doesnt so it pulls slightly.
CJG
CJG





