2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

87 N/A hp potential....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 4, 2005 | 11:54 PM
  #1  
EFINI-17's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
From: Illinois
87 N/A hp potential....

I purchased a 1987 n/a rx7 not to long ago with only 48,000 miles. I just need to be steered in the right direction with power gains. I was woundering what mods I would need got get my 87 n/a from 146 hp to around 200 hp? Any suggestions would help. I was also woundering if the car is still capable of running a 15.5 since thats what the factory times say for 1/4 mile... Do they loose alot of power over the years? And what 1/4 mile time should I expect out of a 200 hp 87 n/a Rx7??? Tanx alot guys.
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2005 | 12:07 AM
  #2  
k-rok's Avatar
PHOTOSHOPPER!!
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 386
Likes: 0
From: B-Town Pennsylvania
get a full tune up first. no exceptions.
full exhaust and intake are pretty much all an N/A can do, unless you get into porting and such. 200hp will be hard. im currently turboing my 86n/a though.
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2005 | 01:24 AM
  #3  
Jager's Avatar
Tear you apart
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 5,891
Likes: 38
From: Bemidji Minnesota
Search please, this topic is covered constantly !
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2005 | 01:28 AM
  #4  
BlaCkPlaGUE's Avatar
I live in an igloo
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,546
Likes: 0
From: calgary alberta
Originally Posted by k-rok
get a full tune up first. no exceptions.
full exhaust and intake are pretty much all an N/A can do, unless you get into porting and such. 200hp will be hard. im currently turboing my 86n/a though.
Don't forgot standalone/piggyback, the NA's BEST friend when it comes to making more power.

If you want 200hp, I think your going to need the following to get it with stock porting.

-Full removal of the 6pi for maximum peak airflow
-Ported manifolds
-Polished and smoothed out intake as well
-Piggyback/Standalone (standalone will be a shitload better)
-Full exhaust including header
-Cone filter intake

That would be a pretty damn badass NA.
If you go as far as an agressive street/bridge port, you could get much much higher HP.
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2005 | 02:52 AM
  #5  
88IntegraLS's Avatar
Displacement > Boost
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,503
Likes: 0
From: Mississippi
I beg to differ, porting is the NA's best friend for power added per mod. It's just a lot harder than most bolt-ons. Second would come exhaust, third would come a cold air intake and intake manifold porting, fourth would come EMS.

In my opinion of course.
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2005 | 08:00 AM
  #6  
RETed's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 22
From: n
Not going to happen unless you go forced induction or NOS.
Trying to get it NA up to 200hp (at the wheels?) takes a lot of custom work or a lot of money!


-Ted
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2005 | 09:54 AM
  #7  
Mason Rx7's Avatar
Dancing w/ teh devil...
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 793
Likes: 0
From: Oklahoma
Read the archive at the top of the page.

https://www.rx7club.com/2nd-gen-archive-72/how-make-beefy-n-need-your-recommendations-31410/
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2005 | 04:56 PM
  #8  
Jager's Avatar
Tear you apart
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 5,891
Likes: 38
From: Bemidji Minnesota
Imho:

Porting (Kahren agressive stage streetport) (s5 rotors)
Extrude honed manifolds
Full exhaust
Cold air intake of a sort
Adding a piggy back or perferably a stand alone ECU

Then NOS! That should be good for 200 HP.

(Since its what I'm planning). I say search under Kahren and see the numbers he was making in his NA's.
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2005 | 05:02 PM
  #9  
CrypticApathy's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 308
Likes: 0
From: Tampa Florida
theres alot of things you can do, just ask your local rotary drivers and find out what they did to there cars. If they did something you didnt do and are able to then do it. You would be suprised what can be done to these things. Turbo's and Nos arnt the end all to be all of power.
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2005 | 10:44 PM
  #10  
rotaryroket87's Avatar
braaaaaaaaaaaaaa pshhhhhh
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
From: kansas
v8 conversion lol
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2005 | 10:49 PM
  #11  
SonicRaT's Avatar
Super Raterhater
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 10,630
Likes: 3
From: NY, MA, MI, OR, TX, and now LA or AZ!
BHP or WHP?
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2005 | 01:08 AM
  #12  
88IntegraLS's Avatar
Displacement > Boost
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,503
Likes: 0
From: Mississippi
I thought he meant brake, as he compared it to the "stock 146hp" rated at the flywheel.
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2005 | 06:02 AM
  #13  
RETed's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 22
From: n
Originally Posted by CrypticApathy
Turbo's and Nos arnt the end all to be all of power.
No, but they are the cheapest and "easiest" way to get power out of these engines...


-Ted
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2005 | 04:46 PM
  #14  
CrypticApathy's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 308
Likes: 0
From: Tampa Florida
Thats true. But id rather tell someone im getting 300rwhp out of the engine as opposted to needing a turbo to do it. I wont even go in to nos i consider it cheating. just my opnion though.
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2005 | 05:13 PM
  #15  
t-too's Avatar
Fast when it works
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 267
Likes: 0
From: Missoula MT usa
i agree i'm just not as impressed to see a fast car if its using nos... you dont deserve any extra power you dont normally have. that is unless youre just trying to see just how fast you can get it and dont have anything left to do
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2005 | 05:18 PM
  #16  
t-too's Avatar
Fast when it works
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 267
Likes: 0
From: Missoula MT usa
i encourage turbos though sometimes it just makes more sense to have it turboed($$$$$)
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2005 | 05:23 PM
  #17  
SonicRaT's Avatar
Super Raterhater
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 10,630
Likes: 3
From: NY, MA, MI, OR, TX, and now LA or AZ!
Originally Posted by CrypticApathy
Thats true. But id rather tell someone im getting 300rwhp out of the engine as opposted to needing a turbo to do it. I wont even go in to nos i consider it cheating. just my opnion though.
How the hell do you people think NOS is cheating? I mean what kind of test do you think this is? Last I checked, the goal was to get from point A to point B as fast as possible by any means possible, under the same regard I considering engines cheating, run your *** down that 1/4 mile, ya lazy bastard!
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2005 | 05:25 PM
  #18  
CrypticApathy's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 308
Likes: 0
From: Tampa Florida
Nos is cheating b/c once you run out of the juice your car nolonger has that power and until its on the juice your car doesnt have the power. Before you do it dont compare nos to gasoline.
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2005 | 05:26 PM
  #19  
Jager's Avatar
Tear you apart
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 5,891
Likes: 38
From: Bemidji Minnesota
Originally Posted by t-too
i agree i'm just not as impressed to see a fast car if its using nos... you dont deserve any extra power you dont normally have. that is unless youre just trying to see just how fast you can get it and dont have anything left to do
?

So how do you feel about forced induction? That's something that isn't supposed to be there.

NOS is just another power adder. I bet you got pwnt buy a Civic running nitrous?
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2005 | 05:28 PM
  #20  
Jager's Avatar
Tear you apart
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 5,891
Likes: 38
From: Bemidji Minnesota
Originally Posted by CrypticApathy
Nos is cheating b/c once you run out of the juice your car nolonger has that power and until its on the juice your car doesnt have the power. Before you do it dont compare nos to gasoline.
NOS is like gasoline. Go race your car without it .
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2005 | 05:41 PM
  #21  
SonicRaT's Avatar
Super Raterhater
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 10,630
Likes: 3
From: NY, MA, MI, OR, TX, and now LA or AZ!
Amazing the crap people come up with....almost sounds like a **** poor excuse for not being able to afford it, just like most people who bash turbo's, generally they can't affford it..... Either that or someone dropped them on the head, because the goal of 'modifying' a car is to make it go faster... and a turbo is always going to net more than without one, and the same goes for NOS/
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2005 | 05:46 PM
  #22  
Jager's Avatar
Tear you apart
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 5,891
Likes: 38
From: Bemidji Minnesota
Originally Posted by SonicRaT
Amazing the crap people come up with....almost sounds like a **** poor excuse for not being able to afford it, just like most people who bash turbo's, generally they can't affford it..... Either that or someone dropped them on the head, because the goal of 'modifying' a car is to make it go faster... and a turbo is always going to net more than without one, and the same goes for NOS/
I said it once, I'll say it again:
Attached Thumbnails 87 N/A hp potential....-mcown3d.jpg  
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2005 | 07:19 PM
  #23  
CrypticApathy's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 308
Likes: 0
From: Tampa Florida
Nos is cheating the way i see it. Turboing i dont ahve anything against it but i dont think ill be bothering to do it to my car.
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2005 | 07:24 PM
  #24  
RoadRaceJosh's Avatar
Hobby or mental illness?
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 478
Likes: 0
From: SW Washington
Yeah, "I won't bother." means I can't afford it on pizza delivery driver wages.
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2005 | 07:24 PM
  #25  
Makenzie71's Avatar
...94% correct.
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,283
Likes: 2
From: High Texas
Originally Posted by SonicRaT
Amazing the crap people come up with....almost sounds like a **** poor excuse for not being able to afford it, just like most people who bash turbo's, generally they can't affford it..... Either that or someone dropped them on the head, because the goal of 'modifying' a car is to make it go faster... and a turbo is always going to net more than without one, and the same goes for NOS/
people who say it's cheating are full of poopy...but my opinion of it is that if you're going to toss natural aspiration out the window, there's more bang/buck with supercharging or turbocharging. Plus, when was the last time you heard someone say they couldn't run you because their turbo was empty?
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:08 AM.