2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

86 NA 6-port

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-12-16, 04:32 AM
  #1  
80's vibes

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Mazdarian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Europe
Posts: 121
Received 16 Likes on 8 Posts
86 NA 6-port

I've done a bit of reading up / searching on the topic of 5/6th-port stuff, and have come across the argument of 'you'll lose low-end torque' everywhere. Still, something eludes me; WHY exactly is this torque lost? is it AFR related? and if so, can't it be negated through a present standalone?

To add a little context; We run a supercharged S2000 in the local Time Attack competitions, which had it's VTEC locked to 'always engaged' and the maps altered accordingly. Same principle or different ballpark?

Hope the hear from ya
Old 09-12-16, 05:24 AM
  #2  
80's vibes

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Mazdarian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Europe
Posts: 121
Received 16 Likes on 8 Posts
Charge velocity, never mind me..

For posterity and future readers; NA, Airflow, important. The NA can't fill its lungs properly through the large bore created upon wiring the 5/6th-ports open @ low revs. Same reason you don't really wanna mess with the IM runner diameters too much. Bigger doesn't always mean better. Turbo II's don't give a darn due to forced induction, thus using a 4-port LIM.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
blk88t2
Megasquirt Forum
1
09-14-16 09:58 AM
craaaazzy
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
2
09-13-16 12:45 PM
akunochi
Power FC Forum
0
09-12-16 01:55 AM
blk88t2
General Rotary Tech Support
1
09-11-16 07:36 PM
jjwalker
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
6
09-09-16 06:12 AM



Quick Reply: 86 NA 6-port



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:40 PM.