2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

5/6 ports, easier to reengineer s4 or s5?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 24, 2007 | 09:51 PM
  #1  
DREYKO's Avatar
Thread Starter
I "lost" my emissions....
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,764
Likes: 6
From: lillington, nc
5/6 ports, easier to reengineer s4 or s5?

ok i have a s5 block with a s4 ecu.
that being said, i once, in a dumber existance, removed my 5/6 port sleeves rods and actuators. i no longer have the parts.

i also have no air pump, rats nest, or cats.

so;
1) can i use a s4 lim on a s5 block with s5 upper intake?
and if so
2)which would be easier to reinstall make operable s4 or s5?

i am planning on installing a high flow cat so i may make enough backpressure to run s4's thats whay im asking.
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2007 | 09:53 PM
  #2  
cptpain's Avatar
Torqueless Wonder
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,020
Likes: 3
From: Texas
if its already removed, and has run fine, just leave it be
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2007 | 10:09 PM
  #3  
DREYKO's Avatar
Thread Starter
I "lost" my emissions....
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,764
Likes: 6
From: lillington, nc
see im thinking ill get not only better torque, but less air means less gas needed on my safc so better fuel mialage.
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2007 | 10:25 PM
  #4  
Enthu's Avatar
Still has an RX7.
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,015
Likes: 5
From: minneapolis MN
1- yes
2= if you have an S4 LIM, go with s4 ports. depending on how you actuate them, well the S5 vacuum rack and actuators are better for exhaust options. But electronic actuation would be the best. Since with the S5 stock system yo MUST keep the air pump to operate the VDI and 6PI.
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2007 | 12:03 AM
  #5  
arghx's Avatar
rotorhead
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 16,205
Likes: 461
From: cold
man i did the electronic activation thing and I did not find it reliable over time. I would rig up an s4 smog pump to activate it. and if you've got the money get the pineapple racing auxilary port sleeves. I had good luck with mine.
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2007 | 12:39 PM
  #6  
DREYKO's Avatar
Thread Starter
I "lost" my emissions....
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,764
Likes: 6
From: lillington, nc
so just to confirm if i go s4 5/6 ports on my s5 engine with the s5 middle and upper intakes i can use the stock air pump to activate them without needing the rats nest/ vac rack and everything will bolt up?
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2007 | 06:17 AM
  #7  
RotaMan99's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,791
Likes: 0
From: New Hampshire
S4 and S5 port sleeves are the same.

[so just to confirm if i go s4 5/6 ports on my s5 engine with the s5 middle and upper intakes i can use the stock air pump to activate them without needing the rats nest/ vac rack and everything will bolt up?
No.

I would stick with the S5 LIM. You will have to drill and gring a spot for a new hole on the S5 UIM if you were to use the S4 LIM. There is no need to do this unless you are swapping the s5 intake manis onto a s4 block and want to keep emmisions. Otherwise in both cases, use the S5 LIM.

To use the S4 lim you will also have to change the lim to engine gasket. reason being because the emisions ports on a s5 block are in the middle and on the end plates but the ones on the end plates are not used and covered by the gasket. So you could either cut holes for those ports or get a new gasket from mazdatrix.

If you don't open up those ports, you will not be able to use the S5 ACV correctly.
Notice I said S5 ACV. That ACV has a nipple for ports with air pressure from the air pump.

You can wire up 2 rpm switches and reuse 2 3 way solenoids and the wiring, the EGR and FPR to activate them.
https://www.rx7club.com/ne-rx-7-forum-30/any-one-ne-area-know-how-do-s5-vdi-manifold-swap-665432/page3/
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2007 | 06:49 AM
  #8  
NZConvertible's Avatar
I'm a boost creep...
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 8
From: Auckland, New Zealand
Originally Posted by DREYKO
see im thinking ill get not only better torque, but less air means less gas needed on my safc so better fuel mialage.
I wouldn't expect to save any fuel from doing this. Opening and closing the sleeves changes the port area and timing, which changes how efficiently the chambers are filled. More efficient chamber filling means more airflow (and hence more torque), not less. The S-AFC has nothing to do with this either.
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2007 | 11:05 AM
  #9  
RotaMan99's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,791
Likes: 0
From: New Hampshire
I wouldn't expect to save any fuel from doing this. Opening and closing the sleeves changes the port area and timing, which changes how efficiently the chambers are filled. More efficient chamber filling means more airflow (and hence more torque), not less. The S-AFC has nothing to do with this either.
With the ports open you are loosing intake velocity so the chambers are not filling as quickly as if the ports were closed. As we all know, we gain power down low from keeping them closed.
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2007 | 12:30 PM
  #10  
DREYKO's Avatar
Thread Starter
I "lost" my emissions....
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,764
Likes: 6
From: lillington, nc
Rota man that write up is showing you still using the rats nest. i do not have that system installed. can i do this with out that?
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2007 | 08:26 PM
  #11  
NZConvertible's Avatar
I'm a boost creep...
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 8
From: Auckland, New Zealand
Originally Posted by RotaMan99
With the ports open you are loosing intake velocity so the chambers are not filling as quickly as if the ports were closed. As we all know, we gain power down low from keeping them closed.
You've just said basically the same as what I did...
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2007 | 06:32 AM
  #12  
RotaMan99's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,791
Likes: 0
From: New Hampshire
^ hm.

Rota man that write up is showing you still using the rats nest. i do not have that system installed. can i do this with out that?
I kept the vacuum rack because the owner wanted to keep emmisions.

you can remove the vacuum rack but that means you loose a spot to mount the solenoids and you loose the mounting location for the PCV which you SHOULD keep. You could modifiy the vac rack and keep only what is needed but cutting the rest off. Keep the solid tubing that is used for the AUX and VDI actuation so you don't have rubber lines running from one side of the engine to the other. Also keep the large tubing which should have 4 nipples for the oil injectors.

the vacuum rack I wouldn't call a rats nest when you eliminate a lot of the vacuum lines and only keep what you need.

I just now noticed you have no air pump or cats. So in the case , I would still keep what you need off the vac rack and just block off the ACV. You COULD, if there is enough pressure, operate both vdi and aux with exhaust pressure. When wanting power from the engine though, pressure in the exhaust is what we try to minimize. You may have to go electronic such as air pumps.

I was actually going to use a small1/4 gallon air tank with a mini air compressor and a 3 way solenoid that could hold pressure without leaking it that would pressurize the tank to 10psi or so that way the ports would operate quickly without any electrical load or pumps overheating if at high rpms long enough. My lumbar pumps overheat and shut down after 5 minutes of running in ambiant air temp. That is probubly reduced when in the hot engine bay and constantly used over and over again without being able to cool down. With that said, I have not had any issues with my 2 lumbar pumps to speak of.

Last edited by RotaMan99; Oct 27, 2007 at 06:41 AM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jeff20B
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
73
Sep 16, 2018 07:16 PM
josef 91 vert
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
14
Sep 17, 2015 09:22 PM
Josh83rx7
Build Threads
0
Sep 15, 2015 10:23 AM
doritoloco
New Member RX-7 Technical
7
Sep 5, 2015 12:41 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:04 PM.