2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

4 port n/a or 6 port n/a

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 9, 2007 | 08:15 AM
  #1  
danhaggis's Avatar
Thread Starter
A fellow rotary guy
Tenured Member 15 Years
Veteran: Marine Corp
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 236
Likes: 0
From: Torrington, CT
4 port n/a or 6 port n/a

Which a better motor the 4 port n/a in the rx3's or the 6 ports? Which would be better for turbo? i want to do something a little diferent than just swaping in the 13bt
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2007 | 08:43 AM
  #2  
YaNi's Avatar
RIP Mark
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 657
Likes: 2
From: Dublin, OH
6 Port FTW!!
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2007 | 09:42 AM
  #3  
Aaron Cake's Avatar
Engine, Not Motor
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 29,798
Likes: 128
From: London, Ontario, Canada
There is no "better". It will depend on your goals.

For turbo applications (stock ports), my opinion is that that 6 port end plates are superior. However there will be fitment issues depending on your intake manifold choice.

Once you start porting, it almost doesn't matter.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
josef 91 vert
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
14
Sep 17, 2015 09:22 PM
mulcryant
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
10
Sep 9, 2015 05:24 PM
Joe's_7
New Member RX-7 Technical
1
Sep 8, 2015 04:44 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:50 PM.