2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

4.3 rearend and 16 inch wheels...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 9, 2003 | 07:46 AM
  #1  
Rotary Dawg's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 299
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles!!!! Lovely.
Talking 4.3 rearend and 16 inch wheels...

...how high should the revs be when I am at 80 mph? Does anyone have a formula? Thanks!
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2003 | 08:51 AM
  #2  
wakeech's Avatar
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 15
Likes: 1
From: Greater Vancouver Area, BC, Canada
it's not too hard to figure out if you know what the gearbox ratio is and what the TOTAL diameter of your wheel is (like, are the tyres 5 series on 16x3 's, or are they 125 series on 16x7's?? ...i know, i know, just an example )
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2003 | 11:13 AM
  #3  
mazdaspeed7's Avatar
mad scientist
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,665
Likes: 2
From: Savannah, GA
One of my friends has that exact setup on his 87 GXL. GTUs rear(4.33), and S5 turbo wheels with 245 45 16's. The wheels are slightly taller than stock, but its enough to offset the 4.3 gears. His speedometer is dead on, without any adjustment.
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2003 | 11:41 AM
  #4  
Rxmfn7's Avatar
Do a barrel roll!
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 7,529
Likes: 2
From: Lower Burrell, PA
Whats the point of putting in the 4.3 rear if youre just going to offset it with taller tires??
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2003 | 12:12 PM
  #5  
KiyoKix's Avatar
13B N/A POWA!
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,013
Likes: 0
From: Everywhere, WRLD
Very true...

Originally posted by Rxmfn7
Whats the point of putting in the 4.3 rear if youre just going to offset it with taller tires??
I agree, but I'm gonna do the samething. But I want the internal gears to be different also.
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2003 | 12:32 PM
  #6  
mazdaspeed7's Avatar
mad scientist
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,665
Likes: 2
From: Savannah, GA
well, at least the taller tires didnt kill his final drive this way...
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2003 | 01:18 PM
  #7  
Silkworm's Avatar
Has been.. hangin' around
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,618
Likes: 0
From: Milpitas, CA
You need to know the actual height of the tires to calculate.
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2003 | 02:13 PM
  #8  
j200pruf's Avatar
RIP Icemark
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,481
Likes: 1
From: Aloha OR
There used to be an awsome calculator that took all this stuff into account, and it was made for RX7's, it had all stock trannys, and some of the racing ones at the click of a button, plus you could enter your own #'s, does anyone remember that link?
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2003 | 06:49 PM
  #9  
JerryLH3's Avatar
Rabbit hole specialist
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Community Favorite
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,852
Likes: 225
From: Tampa, FL
I did a tech column on this for my club's newsletter last year.

Just use this formula:

V=(TCxRPM)/(1056xARxTR)

V is velocity in mph
TC is tire circumference
RPM is engine speed
AR is axle or rear end ratio
TR is trannsmission ratio

To find TC, you must know tire diameter, TD.

TD=(sidewall x 2)+Wheel diameter

Sidewall for a 205/60 tire would be 205mm x .6. Multiply by two, of course. Then convert to inches and add the wheel diameter.

TC is just pi x TD.
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2003 | 07:33 PM
  #10  
NZConvertible's Avatar
I'm a boost creep...
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 8
From: Auckland, New Zealand
As mentioned, wheel size is irrelevant without the tire size. But assuming the overall tire size is the same as stock, replacing a 4.1:1 diff with a 4.3:1 diff will see revs 5% higher at the same speed.
You don't say what your car is, but for a T2 with a stock diff, 80mph is 3550rpm; with a 4.3:1 diff that would be 3730rpm.
The difference between the two ratios is quite small, so I don't see the point in spending money to change, especially if you go and buy a wheel/tyre combo that negates the difference...
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2003 | 07:39 PM
  #11  
jgrts20's Avatar
Who are you?
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,235
Likes: 0
From: CenCal
wow are u serious here? at 80 mph my rpm's r at like 3000+/-
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2003 | 07:45 PM
  #12  
Evil Aviator's Avatar
Rotorhead
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 9,136
Likes: 39
From: Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
Originally posted by JerryLH3
I did a tech column on this for my club's newsletter last year.

Just use this formula:

V=(TCxRPM)/(1056xARxTR)

V is velocity in mph
TC is tire circumference
RPM is engine speed
AR is axle or rear end ratio
TR is trannsmission ratio

To find TC, you must know tire diameter, TD.

TD=(sidewall x 2)+Wheel diameter

Sidewall for a 205/60 tire would be 205mm x .6. Multiply by two, of course. Then convert to inches and add the wheel diameter.

TC is just pi x TD.
... or you could search this forum for the Evil tech column.
https://www.rx7club.com/forum/showth...hreadid=124399
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2003 | 07:46 PM
  #13  
NZConvertible's Avatar
I'm a boost creep...
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 8
From: Auckland, New Zealand
Originally posted by jgrts20
wow are u serious here? at 80 mph my rpm's r at like 3000+/-
As I said, they're for a Turbo, which has a shorter 5th gear than your NA.
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2003 | 08:05 PM
  #14  
JerryLH3's Avatar
Rabbit hole specialist
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Community Favorite
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,852
Likes: 225
From: Tampa, FL
Originally posted by Evil Aviator
... or you could search this forum for the Evil tech column.
https://www.rx7club.com/forum/showth...hreadid=124399
Baaahhh!! My article in the Rotary Flyer was early 2002, so maybe you stole my formula!

It's a pretty well cicrulated forumla anyway, and not much harder than using those fancy online spreadsheets. I wrote up a simple program for my TI-86 for the few times a year I need to use the formula, it justs prompts me for the variables and spits out the unkown value I want.
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2003 | 08:23 PM
  #15  
Evil Aviator's Avatar
Rotorhead
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 9,136
Likes: 39
From: Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
Originally posted by JerryLH3
Baaahhh!! My article in the Rotary Flyer was early 2002, so maybe you stole my formula!

It's a pretty well cicrulated forumla anyway, and not much harder than using those fancy online spreadsheets. I wrote up a simple program for my TI-86 for the few times a year I need to use the formula, it justs prompts me for the variables and spits out the unkown value I want.
Hehehe, the base formula has been around for decades, and is published in the Mazda Motorsports catalog, as well as in most high school auto shop textbooks. Much like you, I just added the tire sidewall information to estimate the total tire height for the equation. Also, much like you, I have my own Evil spreadsheet that calculates all kinds of goodies.
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2003 | 09:03 PM
  #16  
Rotary Dawg's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 299
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles!!!! Lovely.
Thanks guys, appreciate the help!

BTW, the 4.3 just came with the torsen LSD that I bought off another guy, so it was practically free. As mazdaspeed7 said, at least my bigger wheels don't kill my final drive. My vert is slow enough off the line!
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:24 PM.