2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
View Poll Results: 2.25 or 2.5
2.25.
3
25.00%
2.5.
9
75.00%
Voters: 12. You may not vote on this poll

2.25 or 2.5 exhaust on my FC?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 2, 2002 | 08:31 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
QC Motorsports
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 759
Likes: 0
From: Austin, tx
2.25 or 2.5 exhaust on my FC?

This is my street car so I need driveability. Which is a better choice. I want the best performance but I don't want to lose low end either. My car is an S5 so the the 6 ports accuation isn't a problem.
Charles
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2002 | 08:43 AM
  #2  
RotoHusker's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
From: Lincoln, NE
Exhaust narrative from Mazdatrix. They have done a lot of testing.

http://www.mazdatrix.com/e1.htm
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2002 | 08:43 AM
  #3  
rico05's Avatar
WTB S5 N/A FC
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 2,778
Likes: 0
From: College Station, Tx
FOr low end power, you want backpressure. SO 2.25. For *** kickin on the highway, you want as little backpressure as possible, so 2.5. I like highway racing, so I went 2.5 to a 3inch muffler. It all depends on what you want to do w/ your car.


When I get my TII, I'm commin over to Austin to cruise around wit ya man!!!
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2002 | 08:51 AM
  #4  
Thread Starter
QC Motorsports
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 759
Likes: 0
From: Austin, tx
sweet rico. Sounds like a plan to me.
I wanna kick some *** all over the place.

Charles
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2002 | 11:38 PM
  #5  
Evil Aviator's Avatar
Rotorhead
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 9,136
Likes: 39
From: Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
Header with 27" primaries collected into a 2.25" pipe, then gradually increase the diameter of the pipe each time you add components (cat, pre-silencers, mufflers, whatever).
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2002 | 01:54 AM
  #6  
Angel Guard Racing Team's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 975
Likes: 5
From: Puerto Rico Land Of The Fastest Rotaries
If Mazdatrix knew that much their car would be setting records by now.
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2002 | 05:00 PM
  #7  
spazzytroy's Avatar
20b Tinkerer
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
From: TX
Chuck, you should just rip the muffler off of Brian's TII and run same size pipe.
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2002 | 08:45 PM
  #8  
FC3AZ's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 464
Likes: 0
From: Peoria, AZ
Considering the primaries on my header are 2", and its an RB piece, I think that would answer your question. On a turbo car, the story is much different I think.
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2002 | 08:53 PM
  #9  
boostmotorsport's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 706
Likes: 0
From: Dover NH
I just sold 2 N1's to a customer with an NA and enough 2.5" piping. I suggested 2.25" but he wanted 2.5". He also purchased a good quality Y pipe. Assuming the welding/fabbing is done well, how do you guys think this will affect its HP over(hopefully!) stock? The only other mod is an intake. One thing I know is it will sond and look great!
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2002 | 08:54 PM
  #10  
boostmotorsport's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 706
Likes: 0
From: Dover NH
Also theoretically you could put a choke inline just before the Y pipe and tune the backpressure( and noise). Any objections to that statement?
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2002 | 08:55 PM
  #11  
boostmotorsport's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 706
Likes: 0
From: Dover NH
When I say choke I mean butterfly valve and cable, like the one Arospeed manufactures. Sorry for the many posts in a row.
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2002 | 09:05 PM
  #12  
Thread Starter
QC Motorsports
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 759
Likes: 0
From: Austin, tx
So will the 2.25 be better for my street car or should I go all out and do 2.5?
Charles
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2002 | 11:50 PM
  #13  
diabolical1's Avatar
Moderator
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 10,999
Likes: 350
From: FL
2.25 is better for the low end (in theory) but honestly, if you're keeping them separate, it probably won't make THAT much of a difference than 2.50 on the street. maybe on a dyno, but i doubt if you'll feel the difference on the street.

.02
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2002 | 02:01 PM
  #14  
Thread Starter
QC Motorsports
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 759
Likes: 0
From: Austin, tx
So Evil,
You would go 2.25 from colector to cat, 2.5 from cat to Y and 3 to mufflers? Would that be a good set up?
Charles
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2002 | 03:12 PM
  #15  
Evil Aviator's Avatar
Rotorhead
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 9,136
Likes: 39
From: Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
Originally posted by peacekeeper
So Evil,
You would go 2.25 from colector to cat, 2.5 from cat to Y and 3 to mufflers? Would that be a good set up?
Charles
The 2.25 to 2.5 to 3 would be good for a single exhaust. For a Y with dual exhaust, then I would keep the same diameter before and after the Y.

Using Pi R^2 you can calculate the diameters. With the stats below, you can see that dual 2.25" pipes are nearly 1 sq in larger than a single 3" pipe.

2.00" = 3.14 sq in
2.25" = 3.97 sq in
2.50" = 4.91 sq in
3.00" = 7.07 sq in
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
doritoloco
New Member RX-7 Technical
7
Sep 5, 2015 12:41 PM
High_Carb_Diet
Power FC Forum
1
Sep 5, 2015 09:07 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:12 AM.