2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

165 MPH, 18 PSI = boom

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-22-05, 09:02 PM
  #26  
Resident Know-it-All

Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
patman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Richland, WA
Posts: 3,099
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
af61r is very nice. i cant argue abut the power numbers, cause i have np proof, and sure as hell no way to prove it now. in reality, whether it was 400 or 500 isnt particularly important to me compared to the overall area under the power curve and the acceleration of the car, and it accelerated very very fast. i will definately dyno the new setup once it is broken in, but i dont expect to start buying parts until march or so, so i'd say a fully running, broken in engine wont be until late april. i guarantee that the new setup will make over 500 peak hp, with a relatively flat power curve, as that is my numerical goal. like i said im not real impressed with dyno numbers, but you gotta have some kinda goal to shoot for, and im convinced it can be done on pump gas with the right tuning and engine build. i guess this one just didnt meet those conditions.
Old 12-22-05, 09:03 PM
  #27  
Resident Know-it-All

Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
patman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Richland, WA
Posts: 3,099
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
oh yeah is the port timing the same on the s5 irons?
Old 12-23-05, 12:30 AM
  #28  
Rx-hippie

iTrader: (1)
 
trainwreck517's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Torrance CA
Posts: 2,076
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I believe port timing is the same for both S4 ans S5 T2. Although I wouldn't rely on just the S5 rear iron. I cracked mine and the car was only running 10psi.. must of hit some slient but deadly detonation.

Well guess its just gives me an excuse to rebuild the motor with an even bigger street port.

Mine doesn't seem to be as bad as yours though, just leaking slightly. Still holds good oil presure.
Old 12-23-05, 01:01 AM
  #29  
Alcohol Fueled!

iTrader: (2)
 
J-Rat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Hood River oregon
Posts: 11,093
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Was this on pump gas?
Old 12-23-05, 02:05 AM
  #30  
Haven't we ALL heard this

 
Wankel7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Indiana
Posts: 3,948
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Where was your WB02 sensor>?
Old 12-23-05, 02:42 AM
  #31  
Reverse Engineer

 
fcfdfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Middle of Nowhere, Center of Everywhere
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by BLUE TII
Whether it is detonation or not (big debate) there is a fix.

You have to use the later S5 ('89+) TII rear sidehousing as it has a reinforced rib cast in from the dowel area to the oil filter boss.
What about a dry sump and a monster aluminum plate instead of an oil pan? Who was the NorCal guy doing that? That seems like an awesome mod for the ultimate in engine rigidty, but I don't know much more about it. Anyone know?
Old 12-23-05, 03:09 AM
  #32  
Open up! Search Warrant!

 
Project84's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Kicking down doors in a neighborhood near you
Posts: 3,838
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Can't you post a picture of the damaged engine?
Old 12-23-05, 10:31 AM
  #33  
Lives on the Forum

 
RETed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: n
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 16 Posts
Originally Posted by trainwreck517
I believe port timing is the same for both S4 ans S5 T2.
Port timing for secondary intake ports are identical.
Port timing for primary ports are DIFFERENT.
This is all detailed in the FSM's.
The S4 primaries open 10-degrees EARLIER, so the S5 primaries are technically "smaller".


-Ted
Old 12-23-05, 10:39 AM
  #34  
DONT FEED THE NOOBS

 
gxlbiscuit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: land of slow hondas .... TULSA, OK
Posts: 1,270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
this isnt mine but this is what it looks like:-)
Attached Thumbnails 165 MPH, 18 PSI = boom-cracked-rear.jpg  
Old 12-23-05, 12:20 PM
  #35  
I R SAD PANDA W/O BAW

 
ilike2eatricers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: bay area
Posts: 6,061
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by fcfdfan
What about a dry sump and a monster aluminum plate instead of an oil pan? Who was the NorCal guy doing that? That seems like an awesome mod for the ultimate in engine rigidty, but I don't know much more about it. Anyone know?
rx-heven. I'm sure it would help with rigidity but IIRC it was called an anti shear plate to help the tension bolts from shearing in addition to doweling. I'm sure someone will chime in if I'm wrong.
Old 12-23-05, 12:23 PM
  #36  
Resident Know-it-All

Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
patman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Richland, WA
Posts: 3,099
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
hmm...maybe i should weld together a 3/8 or 1/2" aluminum oil pan...that might not be a bad idea, dowel pins too.... and that pic isnt quite like mine, i broke a whole big chunk out. my o2 is about 12" back from the turbo outlet. i wasnt looking at the wideband, since i was going 165, i was watching the road.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Turblown
Vendor Classifieds
12
10-17-20 03:25 PM
Logan Reinisch
General Rotary Tech Support
44
09-17-18 12:20 PM
LongDuck
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
12
10-07-15 08:12 PM
Casual_John
Canadian Forum
4
09-26-15 01:47 PM



Quick Reply: 165 MPH, 18 PSI = boom



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:43 PM.