2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

Is 1.15 AR to small?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 18, 2003 | 07:57 PM
  #1  
Cory Simpson's Avatar
Thread Starter
I wanta be with the BUC!
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,305
Likes: 0
From: Knoxville, TN
Is 1.15 AR to small?

I have been watching E-bay for TO4's, and I have seen alot of them with 1.15 AR on the hot side. And I am wondering would this be good for a car with a big port? And on one turbo it said it would suport 450 HP and 30 PSI of boost is this true?

And for the hell of it, what would be the best hot side size?
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2003 | 08:23 PM
  #2  
boosted1205's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,191
Likes: 0
From: west
For a street turbo, 1.15 would probably be the largest I'd go with and even that would give you slightly more lag. Most popular is .96 and either P trim or O trim, O trim being a larger wheel. I had a .70 a/r and changed to a 1.15 due to the .70 being too small for a rotary.
Larger the wheel the better , less back pressure, but larger you go, more lag you'll get. A street turbo doesn't need a larger than 1.15 a/r . But, there are alot of opinions out there and I'm sure a lot of people will give their opinion.
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2003 | 02:41 PM
  #3  
Cory Simpson's Avatar
Thread Starter
I wanta be with the BUC!
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,305
Likes: 0
From: Knoxville, TN
OK I am seriously considering to buy a TO4 that I found, but there is one thing that I don't like about it, and that is that it has no coolant running threw it. The only fluid that does run threw it is oil. And I am wondering how much of a binifit is the coolant running threw the turbo?
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2003 | 04:01 PM
  #4  
adamlewis's Avatar
Back from teh deadly!
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,163
Likes: 0
From: Louisville KY 40299
The only thing about non-water cooled turbos is that youhave to let them sit longer at idle to let them cool down.
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2003 | 04:19 PM
  #5  
eViLRotor's Avatar
Brother of the Rotary
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 5,781
Likes: 2
From: Arkham Asylum
I'd say for a mainly street-driven car a Wet CHRA is very benefical compared to a dry in terms of long term durability.

There was a post once in the single turbo forum about the difference in heat soak after shutdown and wear on the bearings between the two.

Try to find one that is both oil/water cooled.
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2003 | 05:04 PM
  #6  
Cory Simpson's Avatar
Thread Starter
I wanta be with the BUC!
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,305
Likes: 0
From: Knoxville, TN
I just read all of those threads that I could take, and it looks like I'll be looking for a water cooled turbo rather than a dry one.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Andrew7dg
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
3
Aug 6, 2017 01:41 PM
Red-Dragon_Akuma
New Member RX-7 Technical
11
Sep 28, 2015 06:09 AM
izzolaw
1st Gen General Discussion
2
Sep 27, 2015 08:33 PM
jarjarbinks
New Member RX-7 Technical
1
Sep 25, 2015 11:03 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:38 PM.