2nd Generation Non-Technical and pictures Show off your car & view 2nd gen RX-7 pictures here.

tires too big?

Old Jun 6, 2016 | 10:48 AM
  #1  
vish86's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 115
Likes: 1
From: ny
tires too big?

so guys i need your opinion,i put advan wheels on and im running 225/50/16 in the front and 245/50/16 in the back the wheels are 7.5 inches in the front +32 and 8.5 rear+32. the tires looks to big. would a lower profile tire help me achieve a less bulgy look or would a skinnier tire?



Reply
Old Jun 6, 2016 | 12:19 PM
  #2  
BLUE TII's Avatar
Rotary Motoring
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 8,479
Likes: 933
From: CA
Yes, tires are too tall.

245/45-16 is the proper height. I ran those in Toyo RA1 on 16x7.5 +30 front 16x8 +30 rear on my FC. The sidewalls are still bulgy, but it does look different.

Does my car look any better to you?



I just found they make 195/40-16 Federal Evos if you want to go low pro.


Last edited by BLUE TII; Jun 6, 2016 at 12:26 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2016 | 12:29 PM
  #3  
Jager's Avatar
Tear you apart
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 5,891
Likes: 38
From: Bemidji Minnesota
FC3S Pro v2.0: Mods - Tires

A great guide to purchasing tires.
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2016 | 12:31 PM
  #4  
BLUE TII's Avatar
Rotary Motoring
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 8,479
Likes: 933
From: CA
Found a pic on an FC finally.

195/40-16 on crown vic wheels (16x7 +6 or +20 not sure which in this pic)
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2016 | 12:37 PM
  #5  
vish86's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 115
Likes: 1
From: ny
Thanks alot. it does look a bit different. i wouldnt go any lower than 45 especially living in nyc thats just asking to get your rim bent lol.

thanks jager
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2016 | 10:15 AM
  #6  
djSL's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member: 10 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,142
Likes: 135
From: Duluth, MN
Lol ^ This is my car. I wouldn't recommend 195/40/16's, It's impossible to fill the wheel gap no matter how low you are. That, and they ride like garbage. This picture doesn't highlight it, but there is a good 4 inches of wheel gap with the car damn near scraping the subframe. I moved up to 205/50/16 all around. I like having a beefier tire after the 40's. I forget the offset, I can check later today. I am running a 5 mm spacer up front.

BTW VISH. SELL ME YOUR ADVANS!!!!
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2016 | 11:54 AM
  #7  
vish86's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 115
Likes: 1
From: ny
Originally Posted by djSL
Lol ^ This is my car. I wouldn't recommend 195/40/16's, It's impossible to fill the wheel gap no matter how low you are. That, and they ride like garbage. This picture doesn't highlight it, but there is a good 4 inches of wheel gap with the car damn near scraping the subframe. I moved up to 205/50/16 all around. I like having a beefier tire after the 40's. I forget the offset, I can check later today. I am running a 5 mm spacer up front.

BTW VISH. SELL ME YOUR ADVANS!!!!
thanks man i would imagine the 40 profile wouldnt be too comfortable lol. im trying not to have too much wheel gap. i guess ill try the 45 profile. and i just got these refinished lol maybe if i find some nice 17's id consider selling them lol.
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2016 | 06:09 PM
  #8  
djSL's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member: 10 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,142
Likes: 135
From: Duluth, MN
45's look good and I used to run them in the front.

Dooooooo it. Sell them. To me.
Reply
Old Jun 13, 2016 | 05:21 PM
  #9  
mxrider914's Avatar
.
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 624
Likes: 4
From: GA


I'm running 225/45/16 and 245/45/16. Slightly lower profile than yours but still meaty. Not a whole lot of options in tires though, you're going to spend a lot because the only ones available are high performance.
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2016 | 09:32 PM
  #10  
kc_mohawk_'s Avatar
Die Hard Fc
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
From: kansas city
yokohama makes Size: 215/40R16
Y- S.drive .
105 bucks a pop .
looks the best in 16'

i had 225/45/16 front and back
and 245/45/16 rear and above-front

and just went back to my good oL 15's
225/45/15 all around hankook RS-3
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2016 | 10:11 AM
  #11  
djSL's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member: 10 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,142
Likes: 135
From: Duluth, MN
S-drives look nice and perform well in dry weather. Unfortunately, they're not good in wet weather and they wear super fast. With normal driving, I went through 2 sets in maybe 10,000 miles. They're a very soft compound tire.

I switched to Hankook Ventus Contact v2's. So far I dig them. The tread pattern isn't the most aggressive, but they grip well in both wet and dry weather. They also come in a variety of sizes and my 20/50/16's were $70.00 per tire at Discount Tire. I've also put at least 5,000 miles on these with minimal tread wear.
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2016 | 10:04 AM
  #12  
vish86's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 115
Likes: 1
From: ny
Originally Posted by mxrider914


I'm running 225/45/16 and 245/45/16. Slightly lower profile than yours but still meaty. Not a whole lot of options in tires though, you're going to spend a lot because the only ones available are high performance.
your car makes me want 16 INCH equips lol.

thanks kc. thanks DJSL ill look into those hankooks
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2016 | 10:30 AM
  #13  
R.O.D's Avatar
Forward, Always
Veteran: Army
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,033
Likes: 4
From: [REDACTED]
I'm running 245/40/17 rear and 225/40/17 front.

.... and as I post this I realise this all pertained to 16s.... sorry

Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
hcaulfield57
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
23
May 2, 2016 07:46 AM
NISxMO
1st Gen General Discussion
8
Apr 20, 2016 06:20 AM
DankestKush
2nd Generation Non-Technical and pictures
2
Apr 10, 2016 01:39 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:42 AM.