Marren Fuel Pulsation dampner?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 4, 2006 | 06:49 PM
  #1  
sillbeer's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 565
Likes: 1
From: Arizona
Marren Fuel Pulsation dampner?

I received my Marren fuel pulsation dampner in the mail today. I was expecting there to be an in and an out on it. Instead there was a single 3/8" port on the bottom and an air valve similar to tire valve stem on the side. Am I suppose to put a T into the 3/8" port and run it inline? And also what is up with the valve stem. I am using this on my 20b because i'm no longer using the stock rails. Thanks.

-Destin
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2006 | 07:18 PM
  #2  
power hungry's Avatar
3 rotor
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 424
Likes: 0
From: Husker Nation
Is it really necessary to run a pulsation dampner? I guess I never have. Please enlighten me.
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2006 | 10:34 PM
  #3  
sillbeer's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 565
Likes: 1
From: Arizona
Well stock they have them. I did a search on the forum and found some usefull information. I don't have any experience not running one and from what I read I don't want to destroy my motor finding if I need one or not.

Power Hungry, You don't run one? How long have you not run one or whats your experience with them?


-Destin
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2006 | 12:31 AM
  #4  
GtoRx7's Avatar
Collections Hold
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,987
Likes: 3
From: Pataskala, Ohio
Yes run it into a tee fitting, anywhere on the pressure side of the system. I helped a friend install one, from marren actually. Its main purpose is for protection of fuel lines and injectors from damaging pressure waves every time the injectors open and close. Like Sillbeer said, they are on all stock Rx-7's , and is needed if using aftermarket rails.

Last edited by GtoRx7; Jan 5, 2006 at 12:34 AM.
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2006 | 09:29 AM
  #5  
power hungry's Avatar
3 rotor
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 424
Likes: 0
From: Husker Nation
Ive never used one. I dont have my car up and running but I never had a problem with eliminating it on my supra, but it never hurts to be safe. Out of curiosity how many people run the dampner?
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2006 | 09:00 PM
  #6  
GtoRx7's Avatar
Collections Hold
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,987
Likes: 3
From: Pataskala, Ohio
I dont know how many use one, its more of a concern with larger, fewer number of injectors.
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2006 | 03:07 AM
  #7  
RETed's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 22
From: n
This subject has been bashed in the FC section, cause I abhor those things!

If you run an SX FPR, they explicitly state it is not necessary.


-Ted
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2006 | 08:17 AM
  #8  
rotorbrain's Avatar
fart on a friends head!!!
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,104
Likes: 2
From: sheppard AFB, TX
yes, that is because the sx FPR has it built in. . . beat me to it, ted.
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2006 | 10:45 AM
  #9  
RETed's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 22
From: n
Originally Posted by rotorbrain
yes, that is because the sx FPR has it built in. . . beat me to it, ted.
It's actually a little bit more involved than that.
ANY FPR is a PD with a bleed valve on it.
So, the FPR itself acts as a PD.
It's not that the SX unit is the only on "built in" - all FPR's are inherently PD's by design.


-Ted
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2006 | 11:11 AM
  #10  
concept-R's Avatar
Corner Carver
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
From: On the side of the road...
Originally Posted by RETed
It's actually a little bit more involved than that.
ANY FPR is a PD with a bleed valve on it.
So, the FPR itself acts as a PD.
It's not that the SX unit is the only on "built in" - all FPR's are inherently PD's by design.


-Ted
I did not know that. Thanks Ted.
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2006 | 01:14 AM
  #11  
Falcoms's Avatar
kill it with BOOMSTICK!
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,227
Likes: 0
From: McHenry, IL
Originally Posted by RETed
It's actually a little bit more involved than that.
ANY FPR is a PD with a bleed valve on it.
So, the FPR itself acts as a PD.
It's not that the SX unit is the only on "built in" - all FPR's are inherently PD's by design.


-Ted
So basically, as I read this, mazda used a seperate FPR and PD, with the FPR only allowing fuel in at a set psi and the PD releasing the excess pressure?
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2006 | 05:06 AM
  #12  
RETed's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 22
From: n
Originally Posted by Falcoms
So basically, as I read this, mazda used a seperate FPR and PD, with the FPR only allowing fuel in at a set psi and the PD releasing the excess pressure?
FPR bypasses excessive pressure.
The fuel pressure in the fuel rails are fluctuating due to the pulsations from the fuel pump and the fuel injectors opening and closing.
The PD does not "release" anything - it just "damps" the fluctuations.


-Ted
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rgordon1979
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
40
Mar 15, 2022 12:04 PM
bryancmatthews
Power FC Forum
14
Oct 5, 2015 08:49 PM
sherff
Adaptronic Engine Mgmt - AUS
5
Sep 12, 2015 12:22 PM
Steven_McKinley
General Rotary Tech Support
12
Sep 5, 2015 10:48 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:53 AM.