Help me decide: stock trans or T56 with 600rwhp goal no drag racing

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 27, 2005 | 08:23 PM
  #1  
CCarlisi's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rebreaking things
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,586
Likes: 0
From: 1 foot in Boston 1 in NJ
Help me decide: stock trans or T56 with 600rwhp goal no drag racing

Hi guys,

I'm trying to decide what I want to do for a transmission in my black project car (FD). I'm shooting for slightly north of 600rwhp. I don't drag race, but will beat the hell out of the car in 2nd and 3rd gear and am going to eventually install 335 rear tires. With that in mind I am considering two transmission choices.

-Stock ~$0
-T56 $3000

Based on the above I'd like to see how many of you, going on something more than a simple 'gut' feeling -ie experience, stories, ect think I should use the T56.
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2005 | 10:00 PM
  #2  
RageRace's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 598
Likes: 0
From: Ft. Lauderdale
Are you strapped for cash or not? Pretty simple question too me. You WILL need to start building your rear end at some point in the very near future, if you plan on putting that power to the ground.
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2005 | 06:02 AM
  #3  
Attila the Fun's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,294
Likes: 0
From: Apex, NC, USA
Originally Posted by CCarlisi
Hi guys,

I'm trying to decide what I want to do for a transmission in my black project car (FD). I'm shooting for slightly north of 600rwhp. I don't drag race, but will beat the hell out of the car in 2nd and 3rd gear and am going to eventually install 335 rear tires. With that in mind I am considering two transmission choices.

-Stock ~$0
-T56 $3000

Based on the above I'd like to see how many of you, going on something more than a simple 'gut' feeling -ie experience, stories, ect think I should use the T56.
The single-turbo 20B built by PFS that was featured in the Car and Driver Shootout used the stock gearbox with no problems. IIRC, about 700 hp.
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2005 | 07:52 AM
  #4  
CCarlisi's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rebreaking things
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,586
Likes: 0
From: 1 foot in Boston 1 in NJ
Originally Posted by RageRace
Are you strapped for cash or not? Pretty simple question too me. You WILL need to start building your rear end at some point in the very near future, if you plan on putting that power to the ground.
It's always simple when it's not your checkbook ! It's really a question of cost-benefit more than anything else. In addition, I like the feel of the stock box. The T56 equipped cars I have played around with feel ok, but definitely not as precise as the FD box. I'd hate to give up that precision if I don't have to. Finally, changing the gearbox will add more time to the project.

George,

Cam at Pettit said whether the stock box is durable enough depends at lot on the driver's age. I've always been part of the smooth-is-fast crowd, so as long as it can handle the stress while in gear I think it will work ok. However, with that said, I've heard a couple accounts of the stock box failing while in gear.

A friend of mine told me that Peter Ferrall said Ed Taylor's car broke 3rd gear on the dyno. Another forum member with a 20b broke 4th gear on the dyno at 700rwhp. Granted, that's more power than I'll be making and it's hard to draw any conclusions based on a few examples without background info, but it does provide reason to be concerned.

Last edited by CCarlisi; Jan 28, 2005 at 07:58 AM.
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2005 | 08:23 AM
  #5  
Red-Rx7's Avatar
Administrative Me
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,370
Likes: 0
From: Kansas
I have been running a factory gear box on my car, while the Guru is in Transit. Granted, the only real hard RWHP figures have been on the dyno. On the street, there is no traction which is very little load.

You make a good point about drivers age, and I gracefully shift very quickly, vs slamming it in. I also roll on the throttle vs mash it as hard as I can kick.

I can tell you this. In 5th gear, the torque of the engine at 70mph when applying gas (ie to pass someone), will throw it out of gear. The gearbox was near perfect before the 20b install, and this only occurs in 5th gear under boost/load.
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2005 | 08:46 AM
  #6  
RageRace's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 598
Likes: 0
From: Ft. Lauderdale
Originally Posted by CCarlisi
It's always simple when it's not your checkbook ! It's really a question of cost-benefit more than anything else. In addition, I like the feel of the stock box. The T56 equipped cars I have played around with feel ok, but definitely not as precise as the FD box. I'd hate to give up that precision if I don't have to. Finally, changing the gearbox will add more time to the project.

George,

Cam at Pettit said whether the stock box is durable enough depends at lot on the driver's age. I've always been part of the smooth-is-fast crowd, so as long as it can handle the stress while in gear I think it will work ok. However, with that said, I've heard a couple accounts of the stock box failing while in gear.

A friend of mine told me that Peter Ferrall said Ed Taylor's car broke 3rd gear on the dyno. Another forum member with a 20b broke 4th gear on the dyno at 700rwhp. Granted, that's more power than I'll be making and it's hard to draw any conclusions based on a few examples without background info, but it does provide reason to be concerned.
It seems as if your mind was already made up with what to do. Personally, I dont think the FDs stock box is all that precise. Why not just use it until you break it, then you can make the decision whether to switch.
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2005 | 05:03 PM
  #7  
ZoomZoom's Avatar
SEMI-PRO
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,865
Likes: 36
From: New Jersey
I agree I hate the Stock FD box compared to other higher end cars Ive driven. I actually think its the least precise to third gear because of the driveline twist. Although the driveline was engineered to twist under stock loads to transfer torque, extra load over twists it makes it hard to find 3rd under high rpms/boost.
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2005 | 05:28 PM
  #8  
RageRace's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 598
Likes: 0
From: Ft. Lauderdale
Originally Posted by ZoomZoom
I agree I hate the Stock FD box compared to other higher end cars Ive driven. I actually think its the least precise to third gear because of the driveline twist. Although the driveline was engineered to twist under stock loads to transfer torque, extra load over twists it makes it hard to find 3rd under high rpms/boost.
Thank ya'.
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2005 | 07:10 PM
  #9  
CCarlisi's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rebreaking things
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,586
Likes: 0
From: 1 foot in Boston 1 in NJ
Originally Posted by ZoomZoom
I agree I hate the Stock FD box compared to other higher end cars Ive driven. I actually think its the least precise to third gear because of the driveline twist. Although the driveline was engineered to twist under stock loads to transfer torque, extra load over twists it makes it hard to find 3rd under high rpms/boost.
That's a motor mount/ppf issue not a transmission problem.
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2005 | 07:30 PM
  #10  
CCarlisi's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rebreaking things
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,586
Likes: 0
From: 1 foot in Boston 1 in NJ
Originally Posted by RageRace
It seems as if your mind was already made up with what to do.
If it was I wouldn't waste everybody’s time with this thread. Before I put ANY thought into it I was planning on using the stock box.

After getting additional information, some of which I posted above, I concluded that an upgrade was in order. That conclusion has held for several months.

However, after digging a little deeper and discovering that many of the people that have had the stock boxes fail are using them in a way that I can't see myself doing, I'm starting to re-examine my decision. For that reason I have spent a lot of time searching the forum and pming people (thanks red-RX7) to find examples of the stock box failing in gear, rather than being power shifted.

Since I couldn't find much info I decided to post this thread with the hope of soliciting everybody to post their good and bad experiences so I could then make a more informed decision. As I said in my original post "Based on the above I'd like to see how many of you, going on something more than a simple 'gut' feeling -ie experience, stories, ect think I should use the T56." You seem to be very opinionated about this subject. I assume you did read my first post and therefore base your opinion on something more than a 'gut' feeling. However, to this point that is all you've shared with me. It would be very helpful to me if you would give me some facts or your experience to work with.

As to why I don't start with the stock box and upgrade if needed: It is something I am now considering. However, because transmissions vary in length and shifter position I would like to make a choice before I cut the firewall and move the motor back rather than doing it after and having to pay for re-fabrication to get a setup that isn't flawed.
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2005 | 09:38 PM
  #11  
Herblenny's Avatar
DGRR 2017 4/26-4/30, 2017
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 13,597
Likes: 6
From: Alabama
I'm planning to use stock tranny. I've talked to few and tranny brace and diff brace will help with twisting and help from breaking. I don't know how true that is, hence I have 4 trannies..
So, are you thinking about cutting the firewall??
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2005 | 10:36 PM
  #12  
t-von's Avatar
Rotor Head Extreme
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,719
Likes: 26
From: Midland Texas
Why not try a beafed up S2000 tranny? I've always heard how great the shifter was on those. I don't know if it would fit though.
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2005 | 02:00 AM
  #13  
Rotary4Eva's Avatar
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
From: Delaware
Had the same dilemma. Ended up going with a new cryo treated stock box. Hope to get a few years in without problems. Just my 2 cents.
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2005 | 05:20 AM
  #14  
Attila the Fun's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,294
Likes: 0
From: Apex, NC, USA
Originally Posted by CCarlisi
George,

Cam at Pettit said whether the stock box is durable enough depends at lot on the driver's age. I've always been part of the smooth-is-fast crowd, so as long as it can handle the stress while in gear I think it will work ok. However, with that said, I've heard a couple accounts of the stock box failing while in gear.

A friend of mine told me that Peter Ferrall said Ed Taylor's car broke 3rd gear on the dyno. Another forum member with a 20b broke 4th gear on the dyno at 700rwhp. Granted, that's more power than I'll be making and it's hard to draw any conclusions based on a few examples without background info, but it does provide reason to be concerned.
I didn't know about Ed Taylor's car. I would have to agree with Cam. I think that applies to a lot of RX-7 durability issues.

The suggestion about having a stock box cryo'd sounds like a good compromise.
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2005 | 10:35 AM
  #15  
94RHDFD's Avatar
Formally 20b 3rd gen
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,416
Likes: 0
From: Birmingham, AL
Originally Posted by Attila the Fun
I didn't know about Ed Taylor's car. I would have to agree with Cam. I think that applies to a lot of RX-7 durability issues.

The suggestion about having a stock box cryo'd sounds like a good compromise.
I agree.
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2005 | 09:51 PM
  #16  
rx7tt95's Avatar
Photo Diety
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,311
Likes: 0
From: Florida
How about a Supra tranny adapted to the FD's bellhousing. CLR Motorsports has just such a setup.
Reply
Old Feb 4, 2005 | 03:30 PM
  #17  
owen is fat's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,579
Likes: 0
From: Rochester, NY
I run a T56 in my LS1FC and it feels rather truck-like in shifting compared to a stock S2000 gearbox... I dunno about stockFD, never driven one.
The T56 probably feels clunky/heavy because the T56 has biggie-sized internals to handle the LS1's low end torque.

I dunno how it will cost you $3000 to run a T56 but zero money to run stock.
-if you run a T56 you can sell off all of your stock parts for what, $1000?
-if you run the stock tranny, youre gonna at least open it up and replace anything thats on its way out, RIGHT?!
-if you run T56 and have the money to go for the best version, you should look for a Viper tranny, they are as bulletproof as they come, but you could also beef up a normal chevy T56 with some off-the-shelf parts to beef it up.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Sobr609
20B Forum
8
Feb 11, 2019 03:19 PM
BNR34RB26DETT
Build Threads
42
Feb 28, 2018 11:27 AM
ashleymiche
Introduce yourself
0
Aug 14, 2015 12:59 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:52 AM.