1st Generation Specific (1979-1985) 1979-1985 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections

Who says 12a's don't need back pressure?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-09-03, 09:56 PM
  #1  
SKELETOR!

Thread Starter
 
Cody's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Prescott Valley, AZ
Posts: 1,077
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Who says 12a's don't need back pressure?

Most of you know the story of my exploding exhaust.

For those who don't, my cats were clogged and exploded one day on the highway, leaving me with only the stock header (collector) and whatever was left of the thermal reactor.

The car used to start, every single day, in this fashion:

Pull choke out, turn key, pump gas twice, instant start up, lower choke to 1500, and good to go.

Since the exhaust exploded, starting was a little more difficult, with a few stalls on the start up process.

Once I did the mechanical secondaries mod, starting the car became a real pain in the a$$.

I would have to leave the choke off, turn the key for like 15 seconds, turning the engine over. It would sputter to life, but then die out if you even TOUCHED the gas. It would die at least 5 times, before being able to run on its own, and letting me pull out the choke to keep it running.

The other day, we had a local Mazda Tech Session at a nearby dealership. I decided, since it was about 20 minutes away, maybe I should try to do something about my ridiculously loud exhaust, so I didnt have to deal with getting a ticket on the way there, or back.

I stopped at a local Pep Boys, and picked up the cheapest "Cherry Bomb Turbo Muffler" they had. ($17.99)

I didn't have the optional Rx-7 Welding Kit in my car, so I bought a spool of mechanics wire to rig it up.

Lucky for me, it was a very tight fit over the 3" of exhaust tubing that was left. I used the wire everyway possible to keep the muffler on there.

I didnt expect anything special at all with this muffler, just hoping it would be quieter than the open header sound I already had.

To my surprise, it sounded great! Like an entire new exhaust. Nothing like the cheap Pep Boys fart can exhaust I was expecting.

I drove back home, it all stayed together. About 4 hours later, I hopped in the car with my gf, who was already making comments about how junky my Rx-7 was, since it took so long to start. It fired right up.

Drove to the Tech Session, stayed there for 3 hours, and when I went to leave, with alot of enthusiasts around my car, it fired right up again, saving me embarassment. Alot of them said it sounds great.

The next day, over 12 hours later, I hop in the car, and it starts right up again.

Someone on the board said in another post, that ANY backpressure is bad for a rotary.

This proves otherwise.
Old 04-09-03, 09:58 PM
  #2  
Driven a turbo FB lately?

iTrader: (1)
 
MIKE-P-28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Fort Branch, Indiana
Posts: 6,444
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Uh I think your wrong I know what your saying but, the production of horsepower is simply the faster you can get more air / fuel in and out of the motor more horsepower it produces.
Old 04-09-03, 10:03 PM
  #3  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
FB II's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: wishing i was back in FL
Posts: 4,192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
hmmm, when i had just straight header it would crank right up no problem still. that happening to is weird. how quiet is that pep boys exhaust? i know anything lower than straight header noise is good, but i mean, can you talk in the car while driving? hahaha
Old 04-09-03, 10:05 PM
  #4  
Rotary Freak

 
setzep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: MN
Posts: 2,524
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Where is there a pep boys around here?

I'm guessing the weather had more of a effect on starting the car vs the back pressure.
Old 04-09-03, 10:10 PM
  #5  
Driven a turbo FB lately?

iTrader: (1)
 
MIKE-P-28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Fort Branch, Indiana
Posts: 6,444
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by setzep
Where is there a pep boys around here?

I'm guessing the weather had more of a effect on starting the car vs the back pressure.
My car started fine with just the 3 inch downpipe... Ive ran rotary open header before and never had them have any problems starting...
Old 04-09-03, 10:12 PM
  #6  
SKELETOR!

Thread Starter
 
Cody's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Prescott Valley, AZ
Posts: 1,077
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nah. The weather has been pretty stable and warm these last few days. The exhaust sounds good. It's easy to talk while cruising, but don't even try at high rpms......

There is a Pep Boys right by Inver Grove Ford, (Robert Trail Road and 494E).

Basically, with the stock header being all that is left....I think combustion was quite odd in the engine. It really can't be much better than trying to run with an open block (or whatever this engine is called).

I notice a much smoother idle, and better response and performance. And, its none of that "I'd like to think there is performance, since I just spent money on the car" as there is with most tiny mods.

I dont feel like I have to worry about the car dying on me anymore....and there isnt as much hesitation in that flat spot of the mech/secs.......where my car would just about die before.
Old 04-09-03, 10:14 PM
  #7  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
christaylor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 1,546
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally posted by MIKE-P-28
My car started fine with just the 3 inch downpipe... Ive ran rotary open header before and never had them have any problems starting...
I've got headers, a presilencer, and straight pipe and have no problems starting up either. Of course, starting it is a completely different process than a car with all the smog crap. If its been started in the last 1.5 days, the choke is a "no-touch". If you touch the choke, it automatically floods the car. If it hasn't been started in 2 or more days, it needs the choke engaged until it fires up. If you keep the choke out, it dies and floods.

Unlike my streetcar, which will fire up with any amount of choke no matter what the circumstances.
Old 04-10-03, 09:43 AM
  #8  
Where did my 7 go?

 
Mschafe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Burnsville, MN
Posts: 357
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well.. my exhaust was straight through for a long time, and here's what I noticed. When I ran just headers it started hard, and ran rough, but as soon as I finished the straight-pipe to the back, everything cleared up. So maybe having no exhaust is part of the problem.
Old 04-10-03, 10:49 AM
  #9  
standard combustion

 
WackyRotary's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Twin Cities Minnesota
Posts: 1,374
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
with the stock header being all that is left.
Ok, PLEASE, don't call it that, call it the stock 12a exhuast manifold from now on, its not a header by any means, its made out of nearly industructable nickel and doesn't create any length between the two exhuast ports before they collect.

DON'T take that personally, but yuck! Its not a header, and no one else would ever call it that on the furum I'm sure. And I don't think its a good idea to run it right out of that manifold under the car for a few reasons- insane loudness.

And even though its non-obstructed-in theory, its also really too short and will hurt flow. A header with no exhuast after it, will be be somewhat more rough but make more then a non-header'd car, and a header with tubing after that will help smooth it out exhuast pulses. The exhuast pulses are very pronounced in rotary engines and longer piping will smooth that out to some extent. I'm not talking about the advantages of long tube headers vs short tubes headers, I'm talking the overall length of the exhaust system will make a big difference when compared to right off the manifold to the rear of the car.
Old 04-10-03, 11:49 AM
  #10  
My FSP Fiesta eats Jettas

 
Wankelguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,616
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Re: Who says 12a's don't need back pressure?

Originally posted by Cody
Most of you know the story of my exploding exhaust.

For those who don't, my cats were clogged and exploded one day on the highway, leaving me with only the stock header (collector) and whatever was left of the thermal reactor.
No thermal reactor on catalytic converter equipped cars.

But you are correct in assuming that some pressure wave tuning aids in scavenging.
Old 04-10-03, 01:24 PM
  #11  
male stripper

iTrader: (1)
 
jeremy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: St Petersburg, FL
Posts: 3,131
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
ok, i'll address the back pressure thing. no car wants backpressure. it is a biproduct of exhaust tuning. in order to scavenge the chamber exhaust Velocity needs to be maintained. tubing size dictates this. at a lower rpm there is less exhaust so smaller tubing is needed to keep it from expanding and stalling flow as it exits. at higher rpms, there is more exhaust being released so tubing size needs to be larger to keep up velocity without creating unnecessary backpressure. now we all know that the exhaust tubing isn't going to change diameters for us to accomodate the best exhaust velocity. so tubing size must then be decided on to maximize a certain part of the powerband while hurting another. to lasrge and the motor falls on its face at low rpms due to the extra burnt mixture not being pulled out and continue into the next cycle equaling a less potent boom. but once the motor gets going it has room to breath and wails on to redline. too small and you have excellent throttle response due to the velocity scavenging out the exhaust and getting a clean chamber through the next cycle. once higher rpms are reached the tubing becomes restrictive to the volume the motor is releasing and it can't expell all the left over gases, and then takes up mixture space through the next cyle.

exhaust pulses are a little more difficult. from what i gather, you'd want them split evenly so the piping is seeing an even flow and keeping exhaust velocity consistent. since the rotors are doing this themselves by timing, giving each header piece an equal length will cause the exhaust pulses to even out and create the effect i just described.

oh yeah, cody don't expect that muffler to last to long. a rotaries hot exhaust tends to melt the fiberglass and blow it out the tailpipe. so don't be surprised if it becomes increasingly louder.
Old 04-10-03, 01:39 PM
  #12  
add to cart

 
Manntis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Saskatoon, SK & Montreal, PQ
Posts: 4,180
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Proper exhaust pulse tuning that creates the right pressure wave to scavenge remaining exhaust requires backpressure, Jeremy that's what's used to maintain the pressure wave
Old 04-10-03, 01:48 PM
  #13  
male stripper

iTrader: (1)
 
jeremy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: St Petersburg, FL
Posts: 3,131
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
from what i've read it causes backpressure. backpressure is not what scavenges. also back pressure changes according to rpm. if your saying that backpressure scavenges exhaust then tell me how, not that it does. i've never seen anyone explain that. what i see is velocity being kept up and thus pulling out or scavenging the chamber. backpressure is a biproduct of this but not what is causing the scavenging.
Old 04-10-03, 02:04 PM
  #14  
My FSP Fiesta eats Jettas

 
Wankelguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,616
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
What causes the scavenging effect is the appearance of a slight suction at the exhaust port right before the port closes. This is a function of the pressure wave's propagation through the exhaust system, and involves the exhaust gas velocity, length and size of exhaust system, and a host of other factors. "Backpressure" may not be exactly the right word to describe it, but that is the term most often applied to what is essentially wave damping.
Old 04-10-03, 02:10 PM
  #15  
add to cart

 
Manntis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Saskatoon, SK & Montreal, PQ
Posts: 4,180
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
as exhaust exits the engine from the ports and into the header or manifold, it comes out in a stuccato of pulses (front rotor/rear rotor/front rotor/rear... you get the idea).

Without backpressure these pulses would just travel down whatever pipe, their sole velocity imparted by the motion of the rotor 'flinging' the exhaust out. Of course, some of the exhaust will be sitting in the indentation on the rotor face and wouldn't have time to flow down the face to the port and out before it shut. This leaves exhaust gasses taking up space when the rotor draws in air and fuel, limiting the amount of fresh charge that can be brought in by diluting it with combusted gas (read: no useable energy left in them that hydrocarbons).

However, with the right amount of backpressure you create a pressure wave. As each puff of exhaust comes out of the engine, it enters not dead space but the exhaust immediately in front of it (which has been held back slightly by backpressure). This turns the pulses into a smooth, steady flow of exhaust. Now, when the exhaust comes out of the port there is a pressure wave drawing out that annoying pocket of exhaust gas, in essence vacuuming the chamber clean of gasses before the port closes.

A very loose example, strictly for visualization purposes: think of racing cars on a track as the pulses of exhaust. They can all flow independandly in the same direction; however, when one is immediately behind the other it creates a kind of vacuum that helps pull the rear car along. Not identical to a pressure wave within a confined space, but it gives you the idea.

Now there is room for a full charge of fresh air and fuel to enter through the intake port, thus giving you better bang during combustion, doing more effective work, and giving you more power and better fuel economy.
Old 04-10-03, 02:16 PM
  #16  
Ride 'n Style

 
Metallic_rock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 1,929
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mantis- great theory, but explain how that applies to how well a header works? (a real header)
Old 04-10-03, 02:24 PM
  #17  
Senior Member

 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Nanaimo, B.C
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i was runnin open headers on the way to the muffler shop... started and ran fine... realy shity respons under 3500 4000rpm now i have straight pipe got my power back and now my car sounds like a sick chainsaw.
instead of an airplane... but its cool if you like airplanes...

Old 04-10-03, 02:52 PM
  #18  
add to cart

 
Manntis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Saskatoon, SK & Montreal, PQ
Posts: 4,180
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Metallic_rock
Mantis- great theory, but explain how that applies to how well a header works? (a real header)
Simple: A proper header tunes the pulses to get optimum pressure wave - that's why equal-length runners and the positioning of the collection point are so critical to a header's design.
Old 04-10-03, 03:00 PM
  #19  
SKELETOR!

Thread Starter
 
Cody's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Prescott Valley, AZ
Posts: 1,077
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ok, if my car had cats......then, what is DIRECTLY after the stock collector/header/manifold/thing bolted to the engine that the exhaust goes out of first.

Looks like a small cat. What is it? Its still there.
Old 04-10-03, 03:04 PM
  #20  
add to cart

 
Manntis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Saskatoon, SK & Montreal, PQ
Posts: 4,180
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's a pre-cat, a sort of catalytic converter that assists the main cat.
Old 04-10-03, 03:12 PM
  #21  
standard combustion

 
WackyRotary's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Twin Cities Minnesota
Posts: 1,374
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That would be one of the pre-cats. IF you have a '84-85 12a model, it would normally have 2 pre-cats and one large main cat with a air pump line going to the main cat. If you just have the first pre-cat, it would be pretty loud and not good since that exhuast is not really treated so I'd be more worried about exhaust getting in the cabin formost, and the first pre-cat has the most potential to being clogged if the engine is running too rich, or driven too hard, or is too old and naturally plugs up. Which could explain why you have poor power to some extent.

Why don't you get your exhuast system fixed right the first time? Don't take this the wrong way, but as constructive direction, but how much or little money do you have to spend on this? Someone could hook you up with their old exhuast system for free probably in the twin cities or you could buy a new system or have a exhaust shop make you up something. I am a firm believer in not wasting time with half-assed exhaust, one time deal and is good for 3-5years probably with no service issues. To me its just too stupid to play with mechanics wire and pipe clamps and flex pipe and expect it to last longer then 1-3weeks on a average piston engine, let alone a rotary engine before you spend another $20 and again and again...
Old 04-10-03, 03:46 PM
  #22  
add to cart

 
Manntis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Saskatoon, SK & Montreal, PQ
Posts: 4,180
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
hence the more bullet proof systems, like oh let's just say Racing Beat full exhaust...

Incidentally, a lot of the weight of our exhaust systems is there because of the heat and after-combustion inherent with our port designs. The Renesis new side exhausts supposedly does away with this.

Going back to pressure wave, the same is true of intake which is why 13Bs have the dynamic effect chambers - a sort of header for the intake system.

The Renesis goes one stap further, having an additional valve that opens at about 7250 RPM that shortens the intake acoustics so the wave doesn't have to travel as far, thus keeping up with the higher-speed air demands of the engine
Old 04-10-03, 04:49 PM
  #23  
Hunting Skylines

 
REVHED's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Posts: 3,431
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I think some of you have the concepts of backpressure and pressure wave tuning mixed up a little.

However, with the right amount of backpressure you create a pressure wave. As each puff of exhaust comes out of the engine, it enters not dead space but the exhaust immediately in front of it (which has been held back slightly by backpressure). This turns the pulses into a smooth, steady flow of exhaust. Now, when the exhaust comes out of the port there is a pressure wave drawing out that annoying pocket of exhaust gas, in essence vacuuming the chamber clean of gasses before the port closes.
What you're describing there Manntis isn't actually pressure wave tuning but inertial scavenging. Towards the end of the cycle exhaust flow out of the port slows down but the existing high velocity gasses in the header help draw out the remaining gasses in the chamber.

Pressure wave tuning is a completely different thing. When the exhaust port opens the sudden change in pressure creates a pressure wave which travels down the exhaust pipe. This wave helps move the exhaust gasses in the same direction it's traveling.

Now when the pulse reaches an opening in the exhuast such as the collector it actually becomes negative and causes the wave to revert back down the pipe towards the exhaust port. This negative pressure wave also helps move the ehaust gasses away from the exhaust port. Ideally this negative wave will arrive back at the exhaust port right at the end of the cycle.

This is the good part, by changing the length of the headers you can time the pulse to arrive back at the port for a certain rpm thus optimising exhaust tuning for that rpm.

That's why I don't see how backpressure will help performance in any way. There will always be some inherent backpressure due to the exhaust pipes but any extra backpressure by the way of mufflers or cats etc will always hurt performance. It will only lead to more pumping losses for the engine as well as excessive exhaust gas dillution of the intake charge especially on ported engines.
Old 04-10-03, 04:59 PM
  #24  
---------------------

 
Keaponlaffen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Kamloops BC Canada
Posts: 2,029
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dragsters = Zoomies = Straight pipes coming out of the block and out the side of the car = no backpressure at all.... They don't have any problems...

An RX-7 Isn't a 2-stroke engine, so there's no reason to have backpressure like on a dirtbike with it's expansion chamber. So, technically, backpressure is robbing high end power on all Rotaries.... but you lose low end if you straight pipe it, which is why you put a full RB exhaust on it. They've figured out a good balance between resriction and free-flow for normal street and race applications...
Old 04-10-03, 08:38 PM
  #25  
Driven a turbo FB lately?

iTrader: (1)
 
MIKE-P-28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Fort Branch, Indiana
Posts: 6,444
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by jeremy
ok, i'll address the back pressure thing. no car wants backpressure. it is a biproduct of exhaust tuning. in order to scavenge the chamber exhaust Velocity needs to be maintained. tubing size dictates this. at a lower rpm there is less exhaust so smaller tubing is needed to keep it from expanding and stalling flow as it exits. at higher rpms, there is more exhaust being released so tubing size needs to be larger to keep up velocity without creating unnecessary backpressure. now we all know that the exhaust tubing isn't going to change diameters for us to accomodate the best exhaust velocity. so tubing size must then be decided on to maximize a certain part of the powerband while hurting another. to lasrge and the motor falls on its face at low rpms due to the extra burnt mixture not being pulled out and continue into the next cycle equaling a less potent boom. but once the motor gets going it has room to breath and wails on to redline. too small and you have excellent throttle response due to the velocity scavenging out the exhaust and getting a clean chamber through the next cycle. once higher rpms are reached the tubing becomes restrictive to the volume the motor is releasing and it can't expell all the left over gases, and then takes up mixture space through the next cyle.

exhaust pulses are a little more difficult. from what i gather, you'd want them split evenly so the piping is seeing an even flow and keeping exhaust velocity consistent. since the rotors are doing this themselves by timing, giving each header piece an equal length will cause the exhaust pulses to even out and create the effect i just described.

oh yeah, cody don't expect that muffler to last to long. a rotaries hot exhaust tends to melt the fiberglass and blow it out the tailpipe. so don't be surprised if it becomes increasingly louder.
In addition, I know this from fact and not from reading a book, the further you move the collector of the 2 exhaust ports to the rear of the car tghe farther you shift the power band upwards. Meaning further you collect the 2 pulses the higher the rpm's will be when the power band peaks, up until a point then its the principal of diminsihing returns
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
trickster
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
25
07-01-23 04:40 PM
alphawolff
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
17
11-17-15 05:57 PM
andyvideopro
General Rotary Tech Support
3
08-20-15 10:55 AM
Frisky Arab
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
13
08-18-15 05:30 PM



Quick Reply: Who says 12a's don't need back pressure?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:41 AM.