1st Generation Specific (1979-1985) 1979-1985 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections

What do yo think of STS Remote Mounted turbo's?

Old Mar 1, 2005 | 03:10 PM
  #1  
DriveFast7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Blood, Sweat and Rotors
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 3,742
Likes: 1
From: California
What do yo think of STS Remote Mounted turbo's?

They mount at the back of the car by the muffler.

http://ststurbo.com/

picture:
http://ststurbo.com/inc/iview/461?idx=5&p=4149

Is this going to work?
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2005 | 03:25 PM
  #2  
Elysian's Avatar
Bimmer *****
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,199
Likes: 1
From: Plano, TX
i've heard of it on camaro's... dunno how well it works.. i'd think thered be quite a bit of lag with all that piping...
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2005 | 03:49 PM
  #3  
Alex-7's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,117
Likes: 2
From: Waukesha Wisconsin
Saw those in a Chevy mag about a month ago. it's a neat idea,has nobody ever done this before?



--Alex
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2005 | 04:44 PM
  #4  
John64's Avatar
What?
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,833
Likes: 1
From: CT
Those where on 2 guys garage. They gave the Camero a 150hp boost. It just seems that they are in the open way too much. It does replace your muffler tho!
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2005 | 07:41 PM
  #5  
skrewloose78's Avatar
Anti-rice Superstar
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 949
Likes: 0
From: huntsville,alabama
im sure there is a reason turbos were not made this to begin with. if this is so great then why havent they been making like this all along?
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2005 | 07:52 PM
  #6  
setzep's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,524
Likes: 0
From: MN
Nice dent in the driveshaft of that camaro.

I'd never put the turbo in the back of my car unless the engine was back there. What is there to gain? There sure is a lot to lose.
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2005 | 09:04 PM
  #7  
kevinbtz's Avatar
Shell 93
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,019
Likes: 20
From: Little Rock, Arkansas
I wonder If the air filter gets wet....lol
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2005 | 09:10 PM
  #8  
hammmy's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 850
Likes: 0
From: Mill Creek, WA
$4K? No thanks.
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2005 | 10:14 PM
  #9  
Dan_s_young's Avatar
Turbo widebody FB
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 3,733
Likes: 3
From: Alberta Canada
the only advantage of that I can see is when you pop your hood people not being able to recognize that you have a turbo right away... To answer the question about water doesnt the k&n filter shown on it shed water off because it has a special coating... Looks similar to on atvs... Besides that I dont think its worth it, all the piping all the way to the back of the car really adds up $$$... If your gonna go turbo just do it the proven method...

I also agree that this turbo would have more turbo lag then a turbo mounted on an exhaust manifold. The exhaust would take longer to reach the back mounted turbo then it would if it was just leaving the combustion chamber. Equalling turbo lag, longer time to spool up

Last edited by Dan_s_young; Mar 1, 2005 at 10:18 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2005 | 10:27 PM
  #10  
Elysian's Avatar
Bimmer *****
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,199
Likes: 1
From: Plano, TX
hm maybe the camaro doesn't have enough room under the hood for a turbo or 2?? even the 3.8l and 3.4l v6's can't come out from the top... they gotta be removed from the engine from the bottom, meaning u gotta lift the car off them... least with the newer camaro's, not the pre what 96 one? whatever the new body style is, they r basically wrapped around the engine...
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2005 | 10:54 PM
  #11  
FD Racer's Avatar
sold the FD...kept the FB
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,328
Likes: 1
From: Torrance, CA
It may not be that bad. They don't need to run an intercooler since the turbos probably run a lot cooler under the car and in the back. That lets them run slightly smaller diameter piping and they probably end up with less than a psi pressure drop....thats totally acceptable.
They are'nt looking to make more than 10 psi (if that) or push more than 6000rpm, so they probably went with a turbo design that spools up quickly but doesnt flow super high which has a good chance of driving nice.

I'm not saying I'd do it, but it might not be that bad for some.
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2005 | 07:11 AM
  #12  
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
From: Montgomery, TX
They make them for GM trucks also. It's a proven setup, many of the guys on LS1tech and GM-Truck have one and like it. It's not the end all turbo set-up for HP but it provides an easy to install boost in power over stock, not sure if you could go to far with it. If you think about it the filter is about as low as most airbox pick-ups nowadays. It's nice and works but not for the price, usually the price of a turbo kit is high because of the level of complex intergration while these are bolt on pipe turbos.

Vernon
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2005 | 11:35 AM
  #13  
Directfreak's Avatar
I am a Jeeper Now.
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 9,371
Likes: 4
From: 3OH5
Remember one thing guys (Especially in California) = These are CARB Legal, and 50 State Legal, as they bolt on AFTER your Catalytic converters..
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2005 | 11:55 AM
  #14  
web777's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,228
Likes: 0
From: LOS ANGELES
The things that would worry me is; water in the airfilter, oil line - you need a pump from the turbo drain to the oil pan and turbo lag. But it seems like they worked through all of those problems. It might be worth a shot.
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2005 | 12:06 PM
  #15  
dazdconfsd's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
From: Decatur, GA
Originally Posted by web777
The things that would worry me is; water in the airfilter, oil line - you need a pump from the turbo drain to the oil pan and turbo lag. But it seems like they worked through all of those problems. It might be worth a shot.
As I understand it, another advantage to this setup is no oil line to the turbo. The exhaust has cooled down enough by the time it reaches it, it's not needed.
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2005 | 01:55 PM
  #16  
nevarmore's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 739
Likes: 0
From: NE Ohio
Originally Posted by dazdconfsd
As I understand it, another advantage to this setup is no oil line to the turbo. The exhaust has cooled down enough by the time it reaches it, it's not needed.
Doesn't the oil plumbed to a turbocharger also keep it lubricated? If so how is that taken care of?

Also, I'd imagine that a significant amount of heat comes from the friction of rotation and from building pressure. Pressurizing things makes them hot and depressurizing them makes them cold.
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2005 | 02:02 PM
  #17  
web777's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,228
Likes: 0
From: LOS ANGELES
Originally Posted by dazdconfsd
As I understand it, another advantage to this setup is no oil line to the turbo. The exhaust has cooled down enough by the time it reaches it, it's not needed.
It still needs oil to spin - it'll die in a couple of minutes w/o oil. What it doesn't need is a water line which some people including myself don't run on a traditional setup.
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2005 | 02:41 PM
  #18  
dazdconfsd's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
From: Decatur, GA
My understanding of the setup is oil is in the turbo and kept sealed in there. With heat not being a issue it last a great deal longer than it would in a engine bay.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
immanuel__7
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
89
Sep 5, 2015 10:23 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:13 PM.