1st Generation Specific (1979-1985) 1979-1985 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections

what benefits can i get from installing a 79 manifold on a 85?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 2, 2007 | 03:20 PM
  #1  
dbragg's Avatar
Thread Starter
Say hello to Mr.Wankel
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 5,962
Likes: 1
From: Cartersville, Ga
what benefits can i get from installing a 79 manifold on a 85?

i have an 85 GSL DD. a friend of mine has a 79 manifold that he isnt using. i thought about installing that manifold on my 85. i just want to know what i would be gaining and loosing. i know about the EGR hole. i already plan on blocking that off with some of that steel in a tube stuff. the only problem is im not 100% sure i have a 79 gasket. a brand new 85 gasket just came in from mazdatrix today. would i be able to use this gasket if i modify it a little?

i just dont want to install the 79 if ill be loosing low end and gaining top end. this is a DD, so i want driveability.

i have already searched and saw one thread, but it didnt have much info. so spill your guts here.
Reply
Old Jul 2, 2007 | 04:50 PM
  #2  
Rogue_Wulff's Avatar
Too old to act my age
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,164
Likes: 0
From: Tulsa, Ok.
The primary difference in the 79 intake, is the lack of shutter valve. I have heard they *can* flow a little more air, but I doubt there is much difference. The lack of the shutter valve, and it associated crap, would tend to make me believe the early manifold has a better airflow pattern, especially in the higher RPM range.
IIRC, there is a fitment issue when mixing carb/intake from early and late 1st gens. Something about the OMP linkage. I just can't remember if it's early carbs on late intakes, or late carbs on early intakes....
Reply
Old Jul 2, 2007 | 04:56 PM
  #3  
aa35199's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 412
Likes: 0
From: west bend, wi
I have an 79ish manifold on my car with the newer FB carb on an old jap motor from an SA, and it seems pretty much the same. As for the big EGR hole I used a block off plate that came with my RB header, I had to drill a new hole to make it fit and for some reason the old motor and manifold has studs every where instead of bolts. Since the studs on the EGR were half way threaded I needed some really thick washers to put inbetween the bolt and the block off plate, and I found that the corner seals from my old motor worked perfecty (ghetto I know). I think you also need another block off plate that goes on the side of the manifold that faces the firewall, not 100% sure I could be wrong on this one. After that I used assorted vacume caps for every thing else and it worked easily. As for the gasket I don't think there will be a problem the difference between your's and the earlier gaskets is that yours has a little extra gasket on the bottom for some port on the bottom of the 81 and up maifolds (pics on the bottom. Since I bought the car with the engine already blown I can't give you a before and after comparison, but the jap motor supposedly has more agressive porting and it seems to drive very nicely with no lowend issues.

early style 80 and below 12a gasket


newer gasket 81 and up 12a


I don't know if the port sizes are different, or it's just the pics being different sizes, if they are different I think its more important to match the gasket to your motor rather then the manifold so you don't risk peices of gasket falling in the motor.
Reply
Old Jul 2, 2007 | 05:03 PM
  #4  
aa35199's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 412
Likes: 0
From: west bend, wi
Originally Posted by Rogue_Wulff
there is a fitment issue when mixing carb/intake from early and late 1st gens. Something about the OMP linkage. I just can't remember if it's early carbs on late intakes, or late carbs on early intakes....
I forgot to mention that I run premix so I never delt with the OMP system.
Reply
Old Jul 2, 2007 | 05:06 PM
  #5  
dbragg's Avatar
Thread Starter
Say hello to Mr.Wankel
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 5,962
Likes: 1
From: Cartersville, Ga
ill have to examine the manifolds some more. mine is coming off anyways. i just didnt know if itd be a good idea to swap the manifolds while i was at it. thanks for the info. keep it coming.
Reply
Old Jul 2, 2007 | 05:22 PM
  #6  
steve84GS TII's Avatar
FB+FC=F-ME
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 3,353
Likes: 5
From: Rohnert Park CA
The SA manifolds are more even and smoother inside, since there is no shutter valve in the rear primary.
When Paul Yaw built my old carb and intake,he used an 84 manifold and simply removed/filled the shutter ports,copying the design of the 79-80 units.Theres nothing fundamentally wrong with the 81-85 manifolds,there is just more junk in them.Replacing one stock manifold with another will probably not gain you much,if anything.If your planning on porting/smoothing a manifold for real performance,the 79-80 is a better choice just for its simplicity.
Reply
Old Jul 2, 2007 | 05:34 PM
  #7  
dbragg's Avatar
Thread Starter
Say hello to Mr.Wankel
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 5,962
Likes: 1
From: Cartersville, Ga
well, what i plan on doing is modding the inside of the runners with grooves to allow for better atomization of the full. the grooves will keep the fuel from "puddleing" on the walls of the manifold.
Reply
Old Jul 2, 2007 | 05:34 PM
  #8  
bad 83's Avatar
PSHH! PSHH! HEAR ME NOW?
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,132
Likes: 4
From: Statesville NC
I opted to use the SA intake for my blowthrough, for the added flow.. There are some modifications to making it work on 81-85 engines. I removed all the egr castings from the intake, and then added the differance to the bottom of the SA intake to match the FB.

Reply
Old Jul 2, 2007 | 05:51 PM
  #9  
dbragg's Avatar
Thread Starter
Say hello to Mr.Wankel
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 5,962
Likes: 1
From: Cartersville, Ga
both manifolds already have the EGR block off plates on them. the main thing id have to do is block off the EGR port on my 85 engine. ill give the 79 a closer looking over tomorrow and i may go ahead and pull of my carb and manifold as well.
Reply
Old Jul 2, 2007 | 06:14 PM
  #10  
bad 83's Avatar
PSHH! PSHH! HEAR ME NOW?
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,132
Likes: 4
From: Statesville NC
The main reason I removed the casting off the intake was to gain clearance to mount the S4 turbo in the same place as a 13B. Nice and tight beside the engine.

Reply
Old Jul 2, 2007 | 08:22 PM
  #11  
steve84GS TII's Avatar
FB+FC=F-ME
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 3,353
Likes: 5
From: Rohnert Park CA
Originally Posted by aws140
both manifolds already have the EGR block off plates on them. the main thing id have to do is block off the EGR port on my 85 engine. ill give the 79 a closer looking over tomorrow and i may go ahead and pull of my carb and manifold as well.
You must be thinking of something else,perhaps the port air injection passage or the ACV.......the 1980 CA cars are the only 1st gens with EGR.
Reply
Old Jul 2, 2007 | 09:15 PM
  #12  
dayton's Avatar
under construction
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,112
Likes: 0
From: savannah
i ran a 79 intake on my 85 for a while with no problems... i can't say for sure that i gained a whole lot buy doing so, but i was always told there was a difference in the runners... 79 being the better of the two... i also blocked off the coolant ports to keep the heat out of my intake... good luck!!
Reply
Old Jul 2, 2007 | 10:40 PM
  #13  
steve84GS TII's Avatar
FB+FC=F-ME
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 3,353
Likes: 5
From: Rohnert Park CA
Blocking off the water passages was another mod that Yaw did to mine.
It has its disadvantages though,especially in colder climates.In the winter,my Yaw carb would freeze solid in only a few highway miles......and that was in CA winters!Were talking only 40* or so,not even freezing outside.I had to route warm,underhood air to the intake,carbs need some heat to atomize fuel and prevent iciing.
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2007 | 03:44 PM
  #14  
dbragg's Avatar
Thread Starter
Say hello to Mr.Wankel
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 5,962
Likes: 1
From: Cartersville, Ga
i want to add to this. i saw the 79 carb again yesterday in person. the actual ports on the manifold are the same size as the ports on the 85 manifold. the gasket is the only difference. since this is the case ill probably be cutting grooves in the 79 manifold and installing it on my car in a few months. i need a break from doing work on my car and im about to move for college.
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2007 | 09:09 PM
  #15  
Jeff20B's Avatar
Lapping = Fapping
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 15,725
Likes: 91
From: Near Seattle
The reason for the tall port gasket was for the rare reverse runner manifolds. I've never seen one for a 12A and only a couple for 13B.
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2007 | 10:30 PM
  #16  
dbragg's Avatar
Thread Starter
Say hello to Mr.Wankel
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 5,962
Likes: 1
From: Cartersville, Ga
so youre saying the runners on the 79 manifold should be different than the runners on my 85 manifold?
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2007 | 11:43 PM
  #17  
Jeff20B's Avatar
Lapping = Fapping
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 15,725
Likes: 91
From: Near Seattle
No. Mazda used the same gasket from '76 to '80 because it was cheaper. Then for '81-'85, they went back to the '74-'75 gasket. It was cheaper than coming up with yet another gasket.
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2007 | 11:53 PM
  #18  
Rx-7Doctor's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,584
Likes: 12
From: Oregon
Get ahold of RX7carl and see what he has to say on the subject since he has done alot of flow testing.

I know on my SE(still FI) my upper and lower intake have been ported and it made a substantial difference in performance.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
trickster
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
25
Jul 1, 2023 04:40 PM
astrum
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
24
Nov 15, 2017 08:44 AM
gabescanlon
Interior / Exterior / Audio
1
Aug 11, 2015 05:59 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:13 PM.