1st Generation Specific (1979-1985) 1979-1985 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections

Turbo II Swap weight and accelleration ( Stock config )

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 24, 2014 | 10:59 AM
  #1  
thegemini's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 241
Likes: 2
From: Phoenix AZ
Turbo II Swap weight and accelleration ( Stock config )

I was thinking about doing a swap and couldn't find any performance data related to the swap.

I was curious of the weight and and handling changes.

Also I would be curious to the 0-60 and 1/4 times.

This of course would be leaving the motor stock with the factory ECU.
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2014 | 12:28 PM
  #2  
notveryhappyjack's Avatar
1 bar boost
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,753
Likes: 5
From: Seattle, Washington
stock Tii in a FB, numbers I would think would be close to a stock Tii in a FC. I would guess 6.5 seconds and 14.5 seconds

mine weights around 2700 and did a 13.1 @ 106mph before
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2014 | 01:40 PM
  #3  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Moderator
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,837
Likes: 3,234
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
most people don't do a totally stock swap, they usually use bigger turbos, etc etc...

but if you want to do some back of the envelope type calculations, we can do that.

lets assume, you install the complete T2 engine, in factory trim, and transmission, minus the precat, we'll assume a down pipe.

the turbo engine, will add about ~80lbs, the turbo itself, and manifold have to be about 40, the trans adds about 15, the FC engine has a lot of "stuff" like coils, so there is probably 10lbs there.

so if you started with an 81-83 car, which is ~2330lbs stock, you'd be around 2420lbs, a GSL-SE is heavier, so you would end up around 2650 or so.

the other side of the coin is power, and in a 12A car, it basically doubles, 100hp to 180/200 depending on the series. torque also doubles.

power to weight goes from about 23lbs/hp to about 13, which is like a stock Rx8, add a couple of minor mods, like exhaust, and you're in the 220hp area, which is nipping on FD power to weight....
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2014 | 02:01 PM
  #4  
Spannerhead's Avatar
Impractical
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
From: Chattanooga, TN
Doesn't some of the SE's extra weight come from the additional 20mm of engine and the massive intake manifold? Some of it comes from the beefier running gear, sure, but the majority of it, I would guess, comes from the engine bay. So that means, all else being equal, the weight of a swapped 12A car and a swapped SE would be closer together than you calculate as long as the same engine ends up in the bay.
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2014 | 02:02 PM
  #5  
thegemini's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 241
Likes: 2
From: Phoenix AZ
Thanks for that info. It gives me a pretty clear picture

I will be using a GSLSE.
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2014 | 04:40 PM
  #6  
captainbizzaro's Avatar
What's that smell?
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 217
Likes: 0
From: Dorset, England
All you really need to know is you would never have had as much fun fully clothed. Fact.
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2014 | 09:48 AM
  #7  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Moderator
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,837
Likes: 3,234
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Originally Posted by Spannerhead
Doesn't some of the SE's extra weight come from the additional 20mm of engine and the massive intake manifold? Some of it comes from the beefier running gear, sure, but the majority of it, I would guess, comes from the engine bay. So that means, all else being equal, the weight of a swapped 12A car and a swapped SE would be closer together than you calculate as long as the same engine ends up in the bay.
i've never had an 84-85 12A car on the scales.

the 79, 100% stock, was 2420lbs
the 83, again 100% stock, was 2330lbs, remember the 81+ has Aluminum bumpers vs steel, and no thermal reactor...
the GSL-SE was 2540lbs.

i wouldn't be surprised if the 84-85 12A was 2400, or maybe 2450lbs.

i always weigh with a full tank of gas, as it is repeatable
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2014 | 10:05 AM
  #8  
Spannerhead's Avatar
Impractical
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
From: Chattanooga, TN
Right. All I'm saying is that much of the SE's weight difference compared to the ('84-'85, at least) 12A cars' goes away once you remove the engine. Take that out and the only differences are what? Larger brake rotors and a slightly beefier rear axle? That can't account for more than 20-30 lbs, tops.

My point is that a TII swapped SE's power-to-weight ratio is likely to be very similar to a TII swapped 12A car's.

But this is all, as you say, back of the envelope-type engineering.
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2014 | 12:33 PM
  #9  
notveryhappyjack's Avatar
1 bar boost
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,753
Likes: 5
From: Seattle, Washington
Originally Posted by j9fd3s
i've never had an 84-85 12A car on the scales.

the 79, 100% stock, was 2420lbs
the 83, again 100% stock, was 2330lbs, remember the 81+ has Aluminum bumpers vs steel, and no thermal reactor...
the GSL-SE was 2540lbs.

i wouldn't be surprised if the 84-85 12A was 2400, or maybe 2450lbs.

i always weigh with a full tank of gas, as it is repeatable
I weighed my 12a car (1985 GS) with full interior, myself 170lbs, some extra parts like bigger sways/roll bar/strut brace/RB exhaust, stuff in the bins, and full tank of 16 gallons fuel

2660lbs
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2014 | 12:56 PM
  #10  
Fungus Mungus's Avatar
Rotary Onigiri
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 911
Likes: 17
From: The Golden State
My base model with spare and a/c removed and 1/4 tank of gas weighed in at exactly 2300 lbs without me in it. This is with a bigger sway bar up front, no sway in the rear, SE axle, SE front spindles, RB header and exhaust, Weber side draft, and 16x7 Volk TE-37s.

fm
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2014 | 12:50 PM
  #11  
DreamInRotary's Avatar
Always Wanting to Learn
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (49)
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 3,078
Likes: 42
From: Cambridge, Minnesota
Cool The Answer to your Question

The whole reason I made this video was to answer your very same question:


It TRULY IS the most fun I've ever had with my clothes on...in a car...by myself
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
trickster
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
25
Jul 1, 2023 04:40 PM
bb6guy
Old School and Other Rotary
10
Oct 1, 2018 08:07 AM
Machupicchu
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
8
Aug 17, 2015 08:27 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:09 PM.