Tornado !!! Adds Horsepower And Better Gas Eco.?????
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Nanaimo, B.C
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Tornado !!! Adds Horsepower And Better Gas Eco.?????
can anyone tell me if this thing acualy works? ive been up all nite and i saw this infomercial on this Tornado thing...
#2
Absolute Power is Awesome
Re: Tornado !!! Adds Horsepower And Better Gas Eco.?????
Originally posted by Fennix_sr
can anyone tell me if this thing acualy works? ive been up all nite and i saw this infomercial on this Tornado thing...
can anyone tell me if this thing acualy works? ive been up all nite and i saw this infomercial on this Tornado thing...
The demonstrations that they give with the water in the 2 liter bottles works for a TOTALLY different reason. This commercial is laughable. I love to watch the commercial just because it is so totally not based in physics.
#3
Rotary Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: NORTH CAROLINA
Posts: 1,059
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
hummm...it is all a farce??...I almost went for it myself...any other comments on this subject?? Anyone have one??? I would like to know what they think first hand.....cjf
#5
standard combustion
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Twin Cities Minnesota
Posts: 1,374
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Oh god, not again! Anyway, ANYONE who wants proof they don't work from a un-biased source, send me $12 and I will send you a TV broadcast that aired here in Minnesota on it. The Local News station, buys products and tests them and explains there opinion on a segment during their broadcasts.
Anyway, they tested one on a Explorer on a eddy current dyno by my former college professor at the University I graduated from that uses the same procedure used by the federal goverment to rate cars performance and emissions.
The results: The ford was given 2 test runs before and after the tornado. And the result: 19.6mpg before, 19.8mpg afterwards. And in the professors own words: "that would be a repeatabilty error. I would expect the same result from any other vehicle using a Tornado".
Anyway, they tested one on a Explorer on a eddy current dyno by my former college professor at the University I graduated from that uses the same procedure used by the federal goverment to rate cars performance and emissions.
The results: The ford was given 2 test runs before and after the tornado. And the result: 19.6mpg before, 19.8mpg afterwards. And in the professors own words: "that would be a repeatabilty error. I would expect the same result from any other vehicle using a Tornado".
Trending Topics
#8
U sUx0rz @ THe IntaRwEB!
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Claysburg, PA, USA
Posts: 327
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The only way a product like this could work would be to have one in each intake runner AFTER wherever the fuel comes in.. there's no way the vortex supposedly created could go through the air cleaner and carb and then perfectly split into the four intake runners... and, if you look at the packaging, the infomrmation they put on it is wrong with it's percentages..
--Danny
--Danny
#10
Function > Form
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Catonsville MD (baltimore suburb)
Posts: 10,890
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
1 Post
Car and Driver did a test on the tornado with thier long term BMW 5series. They said it did nothing in way of more HP (they dyno tested the car) or MPG. By the time the air gets to the combution camber the vortex efect would be gone.
The best way to improve gas milage is to keep your tires PROPERLY inflated.
The best way to improve gas milage is to keep your tires PROPERLY inflated.
#11
add to cart
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Saskatoon, SK & Montreal, PQ
Posts: 4,180
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
BMW just spend a Billion dollars on SMOOTH AIR FLOW for their intake systems - as in no turbulence, etc. As White84SE pointed out there is no benefit to a vortex before the separate intake runners. If anything it just slows down the air at the point where the vortex needs to be ripped asunder to separate the flow for individual cylinders/rotors.
Think about it: manufacturers are now under pressure to reduce fuel consumption by both regulators and their competitors. If a cheap piece of tin can do the job, why do NO manufacturers include them as OEM parts in their intake?
Worse still, what happens to an undersquare or high compression engine in the event a piece of this Vortex thingamajiggy (even a flake of it's cheap 'chroming' on the metal models) breaks free and is drawn into the combustion chamber? Pointy bits of metal don't tend to play nicely with precision tolerance machinery moving at high RPM.
CAVEAT EMPTOR
Think about it: manufacturers are now under pressure to reduce fuel consumption by both regulators and their competitors. If a cheap piece of tin can do the job, why do NO manufacturers include them as OEM parts in their intake?
Worse still, what happens to an undersquare or high compression engine in the event a piece of this Vortex thingamajiggy (even a flake of it's cheap 'chroming' on the metal models) breaks free and is drawn into the combustion chamber? Pointy bits of metal don't tend to play nicely with precision tolerance machinery moving at high RPM.
CAVEAT EMPTOR
#12
Absolute Power is Awesome
Originally posted by WackyRotary
Oh god, not again! Anyway, ANYONE who wants proof they don't work from a un-biased source, send me $12 and I will send you a TV broadcast that aired here in Minnesota on it. The Local News station, buys products and tests them and explains there opinion on a segment during their broadcasts.
Anyway, they tested one on a Explorer on a eddy current dyno by my former college professor at the University I graduated from that uses the same procedure used by the federal goverment to rate cars performance and emissions.
The results: The ford was given 2 test runs before and after the tornado. And the result: 19.6mpg before, 19.8mpg afterwards. And in the professors own words: "that would be a repeatabilty error. I would expect the same result from any other vehicle using a Tornado".
Oh god, not again! Anyway, ANYONE who wants proof they don't work from a un-biased source, send me $12 and I will send you a TV broadcast that aired here in Minnesota on it. The Local News station, buys products and tests them and explains there opinion on a segment during their broadcasts.
Anyway, they tested one on a Explorer on a eddy current dyno by my former college professor at the University I graduated from that uses the same procedure used by the federal goverment to rate cars performance and emissions.
The results: The ford was given 2 test runs before and after the tornado. And the result: 19.6mpg before, 19.8mpg afterwards. And in the professors own words: "that would be a repeatabilty error. I would expect the same result from any other vehicle using a Tornado".
#13
Originally posted by RotorMotorDriver
Haha, I know. Anyone seen the Miracle Blade knife commercials? Damn, those look cool, I dunno if I would ever buy them though, lol.
~T.J.
Haha, I know. Anyone seen the Miracle Blade knife commercials? Damn, those look cool, I dunno if I would ever buy them though, lol.
~T.J.
"It'll cut through a log and still slice a tomato like this!"
#14
standard combustion
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Twin Cities Minnesota
Posts: 1,374
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Send me $12 too!
#15
Seven Is Coming
iTrader: (1)
Originally posted by Wankelguy
HaHaHaHaHa, "Ginsu 2000".
"It'll cut through a log and still slice a tomato like this!"
HaHaHaHaHa, "Ginsu 2000".
"It'll cut through a log and still slice a tomato like this!"
~T.J.
#18
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
iTrader: (52)
Ya that commercial kills me!!!
Sport Compact Car Magazine actually did testing and an article a year or two ago when this thing first came out.
They tested a honda civic 1.6L and it increased .7hp
The best part is they also tested a FB and it decreased 3hp.
Wonder how many Civic guys went out and spent the cash for the .7hp!!!......probably all of themhahaha
Sport Compact Car Magazine actually did testing and an article a year or two ago when this thing first came out.
They tested a honda civic 1.6L and it increased .7hp
The best part is they also tested a FB and it decreased 3hp.
Wonder how many Civic guys went out and spent the cash for the .7hp!!!......probably all of themhahaha
#19
Rotary Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: NORTH CAROLINA
Posts: 1,059
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
wow ,,,,got some of your dander up , didn't it!!!..Those guys on TV formerly known as "shade tree mechanics" said it was good??...lots they know....great feed back...sorry some of ya had to go through it again...thanks...cjf
#20
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Nanaimo, B.C
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
yea those late nite infomercials are ****** hillarious... the convection oven.... HES COOKIN WITH AIR !!.. miracle blade... barely starts cuttin the brass then is like LOOK IT STILL CAN FILLAY THE FILLAY !!!!>...
#22
I wish I still had the plots saved to my hard drive, but there are dyno charts out there showing a loss of power with the use of these. It basically is just an obstruction in the airflow.
#23
standard combustion
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Twin Cities Minnesota
Posts: 1,374
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
but there are dyno charts out there showing a loss of power with the use of these. It basically is just an obstruction in the airflow.
Yeah, its SOO stupid. I don't see how it works? I went to college for Automotive engineering and I would like to see one of these infomercial yuppies use a superFlow flowbench and see what the "ACTUAL" increase in CFM is? I mean, unless there is a positive pressure produced down stream from a obstruction of the harlarious tornado device, I don't see how it could make more power then without it.
#24
Got Boost?
On cars where the injector system isn't up to par, and the gas dosen't atomize well, some turbulence might help, but as far as that POS goes, like it has been said above..... it 'spins' the air too early to help in this regard. It makes a great inside joke aimed at brainless rice boys who will buy anything that they think will give them power, as long as it doesn't venture past intake or exhaust... try it sometime its hilarious.
I remember some kid who was trying to talk trash, saying he had a "supercharger". When my buddy questioned him on the lack of sound, the gentle whine, that a supercharger makes, pretty much calling his bluff, he broke down and popped his hood, and tried desperately to convince us that the 5 Tornadoes he had somehow stuffed between his filter and the TB, constituted a SC. Man, I couldn't stop laughing for an hour, I swear!!
The first time I saw the ad, I was skeptical, but they are pretty convincing.... just research anything before you buy it, you'll save yourself the disappointment, and embarrasement.
I remember some kid who was trying to talk trash, saying he had a "supercharger". When my buddy questioned him on the lack of sound, the gentle whine, that a supercharger makes, pretty much calling his bluff, he broke down and popped his hood, and tried desperately to convince us that the 5 Tornadoes he had somehow stuffed between his filter and the TB, constituted a SC. Man, I couldn't stop laughing for an hour, I swear!!
The first time I saw the ad, I was skeptical, but they are pretty convincing.... just research anything before you buy it, you'll save yourself the disappointment, and embarrasement.
Last edited by fatboy7; 01-06-03 at 06:39 PM.
#25
standard combustion
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Twin Cities Minnesota
Posts: 1,374
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think I've heard that testimonal of the before and after results they post are without the tornado and then with the tornado and a high flow air filter. When they display the MPG before and after, it can be simply a different habbit of driving, and fudging numbers.
High flow air filters is where they get the gains of 10% or some figure. It makes sense to me, if these stupid imfomercials actually were truthful, they would just be selling air filters and be adding "real" hp in the first place.
High flow air filters is where they get the gains of 10% or some figure. It makes sense to me, if these stupid imfomercials actually were truthful, they would just be selling air filters and be adding "real" hp in the first place.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
HalifaxFD
Canadian Forum
126
05-09-16 07:06 PM