1st Generation Specific (1979-1985) 1979-1985 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections

Stationary gear bolts

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 9, 2003 | 08:38 PM
  #1  
Jeff20B's Avatar
Thread Starter
Lapping = Fapping
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 15,725
Likes: 91
From: Near Seattle
Stationary gear bolts

How tight should they be? My manual conveniently left out this info. I torqued the fronts up to 20 ft lbs. Is that enough?
Reply
Old May 10, 2003 | 06:54 AM
  #2  
Rx7carl's Avatar
Airflow is my life
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 6,736
Likes: 2
From: Orlando, Fl
I'd say thats fine. Just good and snug as they have lockwashers. It's not in the FSM?
Reply
Old May 10, 2003 | 08:06 AM
  #3  
nimrodTT's Avatar
all aboard!
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,204
Likes: 1
From: Houston
It is not a specified torque in the FSM. So you flip to the back of the book and look under the "Unless otherwise specified" torque chart. Once you know the bolts are grade 6 and 12mm you get the torque range 41-59 ft-lb.

Though this is mostlikely correct, I would recommend calling up the people you bought your engine parts from and asking them to verify it.
Reply
Old May 10, 2003 | 08:36 AM
  #4  
rxseven's Avatar
Special Dark
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 820
Likes: 0
From: oklahoma
Originally posted by nimrodTT
It is not a specified torque in the FSM. So you flip to the back of the book and look under the "Unless otherwise specified" torque chart. Once you know the bolts are grade 6 and 12mm you get the torque range 41-59 ft-lb.

Though this is mostlikely correct, I would recommend calling up the people you bought your engine parts from and asking them to verify it.
17 ft-lb is the correct rating for those. These are not grade 6 bolts. SAE bolts have grades 2, 5 etc. to indicate strength not metric ones. They are rated differently. They are equivalent to sae grade 2 so you better not exceed 25 ft-lb.
Reply
Old May 10, 2003 | 01:12 PM
  #5  
Jeff20B's Avatar
Thread Starter
Lapping = Fapping
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 15,725
Likes: 91
From: Near Seattle
Thanks everyone! I'm considering loosening them and retorqueing to 17, but I'm not sure if that's necessary. A couple of the bolts felt like they were just starting to not want to torque any further without twisting a little. I suspect it's ok to retorque them now and not risk a bolt failure down the road. Like you said, they've got lock washers so they won't come loose by themselves.

I found this at the repuguru's webpage. The bottom of the first page has torque specs for the REPU. The second page has the "Unless otherwise specified" section.
http://www.geocities.com/repuguru/specs6.html
http://www.geocities.com/repuguru/Specs7.html
I'm guessing the later engines had similar specs?
Reply
Old May 10, 2003 | 07:41 PM
  #6  
nimrodTT's Avatar
all aboard!
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,204
Likes: 1
From: Houston
Originally posted by rxseven
17 ft-lb is the correct rating for those. These are not grade 6 bolts. SAE bolts have grades 2, 5 etc. to indicate strength not metric ones. They are rated differently. They are equivalent to sae grade 2 so you better not exceed 25 ft-lb.
By "grade 6" I meant it has the number 6 on the head of the bolt. And my personal fastener opinion is that these bolts could easily take their non-specified torque.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rgordon1979
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
40
Mar 15, 2022 12:04 PM
24seven_dada
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
20
Nov 10, 2018 12:03 PM
Jeff20B
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
73
Sep 16, 2018 07:16 PM
REX7&Z32TT
New Member RX-7 Technical
5
Sep 9, 2015 05:16 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:56 PM.