1st Generation Specific (1979-1985) 1979-1985 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections
View Poll Results: scoop no scoop
go with scoop, it's functional and looks great
82.22%
stay stock, sacrifice performance for the factory look
17.78%
Voters: 45. You may not vote on this poll

scoop or no scoop

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 20, 2009 | 11:59 AM
  #1  
84stock's Avatar
Thread Starter
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 5,547
Likes: 12
From: calgary
scoop or no scoop

I get varied opinions, my blower scoop hood will be painted and ready next week. Do you prefer the aggressive look with the scoop (it is functional as a CAI for the carb'ed camden) or the stock look (loss of performance due to the warm engine bay)? BTW, scoop pic is before the new paint.







Reply
Old Jun 20, 2009 | 12:12 PM
  #2  
Rotospeed's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 817
Likes: 0
From: Southwest
you have a sc. so go with the scoop. if it was just for looks i would say nooooooo.

btw. what size are your gold wheels?
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2009 | 12:31 PM
  #3  
DivinDriver's Avatar
1st-Class Engine Janitor
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,376
Likes: 28
From: Chino Hills, CA
Same; the blower is awesome, but non-functional scoops have always struck me as aerodynamically questionable.

I'm a stock fan, but that blower install makes me drool.
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2009 | 03:59 PM
  #4  
NoPis10's Avatar
Committee Member #2
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,280
Likes: 5
From: Committe Chambers
I maybe the odd man out but the sleeper look is always best to me...

L8R
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2009 | 04:05 PM
  #5  
OnlyOnThurs's Avatar
TACOCAT
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,042
Likes: 2
From: Milky Way
SCOOP!! making people **** themselves then they see it is always a good option for me lol
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2009 | 04:10 PM
  #6  
rotaryPOWAH's Avatar
On/DEFEAT
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 231
Likes: 0
From: North Pole, AK
The sleeper look is badass, however, a mid 80's RX7 doesn't neccesarily yell fast car... People may think that the scoop is fake considering that it's offset instead of centered as if it where a pistoned engine. When people think that your scoop is fake, and then you blow the doors off them? awesome. Then again, who cares what it looks like. Function>form.
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2009 | 04:52 PM
  #7  
84stock's Avatar
Thread Starter
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 5,547
Likes: 12
From: calgary
The scoop always make other drivers do the whiplash double take, where the stock look attracts much less attention. When I decide to twin charge and intercool it nest year, it will definitely be stock in appearance as the scoop would no longer be functional.
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2009 | 08:15 PM
  #8  
spottedfrog's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
From: Grand Junction Colorado
Keep the scoop. On your car it is awesome.
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2009 | 08:20 PM
  #9  
'87 turbo II's Avatar
Sleeper but still slow
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,766
Likes: 0
From: Georgia
Your scoop is one of the few I've always liked. I also love how it's off centered and probably makes people think you don't know what you're doing, and thus makes it so much cooler that you're making great power!
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2009 | 08:27 PM
  #10  
©ØÐËߣüË's Avatar
Post Pimp
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,800
Likes: 0
From: Spokane valley, Washington
If I still had the supercharger on my car, I would go with the scoop.
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2009 | 10:18 PM
  #11  
rotaryPOWAH's Avatar
On/DEFEAT
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 231
Likes: 0
From: North Pole, AK
Originally Posted by 84stock
The scoop always make other drivers do the whiplash double take, where the stock look attracts much less attention. When I decide to twin charge and intercool it nest year, it will definitely be stock in appearance as the scoop would no longer be functional.
In that case, keep the scoop untill you can turbo it, but where would you put the intercooler to keep a stock-ish appearance?
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2009 | 10:29 PM
  #12  
84stock's Avatar
Thread Starter
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 5,547
Likes: 12
From: calgary
probably something like a mariah front airdam then do a fmic.
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2009 | 10:54 PM
  #13  
©ØÐËߣüË's Avatar
Post Pimp
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,800
Likes: 0
From: Spokane valley, Washington
Im turbo now but heres a few pic's of the charger.



Reply
Old Jun 20, 2009 | 10:58 PM
  #14  
84stock's Avatar
Thread Starter
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 5,547
Likes: 12
From: calgary
Yeah I remember those pics. It was your feedback at the time that drove me to the camden, I had such big hopes back then.......hopefully the twincharge concept with realize them.
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2009 | 04:23 AM
  #15  
Heath's Avatar
MAGNUM SE7EN
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,427
Likes: 0
From: Asheville, NC USA
I say scoopless
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2009 | 04:09 PM
  #16  
85 FB's Avatar
7-less
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,053
Likes: 0
From: No. Virginia, USA
Damn, that car is sexy! And, ©ØÐËߣüË's old supercharger setup is also wicked as Hell. I've never seen a setup like that.

Go with the scoop! It's unique and unlike most have seen.
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2009 | 05:47 PM
  #17  
84stock's Avatar
Thread Starter
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 5,547
Likes: 12
From: calgary
78% in favor so far, keep the votes coming, this is only a 2 week poll. If the scoop goes on I'll post pics along with the striping at the same time.
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2009 | 12:31 AM
  #18  
Super82's Avatar
Zoom Zoom
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 638
Likes: 0
From: Minnesota
Scoop!

By the way, does anyone wanna be a spokesman for the supercharged rotaries? They always make me drool, and sound awesome, but I rarely hear talk of them. What type of power are they putting down? For the price, would you recommend it, or would you just recommend going turbo? Seems the supercharged guys are always quiet and never seem to rave about their camdens.
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2009 | 07:02 AM
  #19  
84stock's Avatar
Thread Starter
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 5,547
Likes: 12
From: calgary
Originally Posted by Super82
Scoop!

By the way, does anyone wanna be a spokesman for the supercharged rotaries? They always make me drool, and sound awesome, but I rarely hear talk of them. What type of power are they putting down? For the price, would you recommend it, or would you just recommend going turbo? Seems the supercharged guys are always quiet and never seem to rave about their camdens.
That is because when we do it always turns into a debate. Soooo, I'll keep it simple! Supercharger=great daily driver, very responsive, instant boost, wonderful midrange, simple install, simple tuning, great torque, no standalone needed, sounds "real" cool, looks real cool with the functional scoop, unique, durable...."however", max recorded rwhp is 210, and don't even dream beyond that. Turbo=more complicated, but done right with the exact same engine can provide 300+ rwhp easily. Purchasing dollar for dollar about the same expense "depending on talent." Turbo is not just a bolt on affair, and benefits from a standalone or proper guidance for a carb arrangement from someone like Robert at Rotaryshack. In my opinion, for a daily driver combined with limited self tuning skills (either with fabricating a blow through set up or wiring/programming a standalone) go with supercharger, if you have the talent and resources and want to win at the drags, gotta go turbo. I probably have the most experience of all on the forum with the camden.
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2009 | 01:36 PM
  #20  
BlackWorksInc's Avatar
Wrkn Toyota, Rootn Wankel
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,642
Likes: 1
From: "Haystack" Hayward, CA
Not to start a debate or anything, but I noticed that most supercharger set-ups are Carb'd would you increase your numbers by going FI?
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2009 | 03:13 PM
  #21  
85 FB's Avatar
7-less
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,053
Likes: 0
From: No. Virginia, USA
That's what I'm wondering cause it'd be kinda cool if I had a supercharger on my -SE's 13B.
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2009 | 06:19 PM
  #22  
©ØÐËߣüË's Avatar
Post Pimp
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,800
Likes: 0
From: Spokane valley, Washington
Well I can't really get into the whole supercharger thing.
But I will say I really liked the supercharger's that I had in the past.
Loved the sounds and the performance they put out.

The numbers weren't what I really wanted.

The first one put out about 150 HP. And was really fun to drive, and we raced the **** out of that car. even went though a few motors. This is with the 5" blower


The second setup was the EFI. Looked killer, sounded bad ***. But only put out about 250 HP. I did have some heat issues with is, but got worked out tuning the mircotech. The 7" blower

Ok then had some words with Atkins. Don't make me go there.....

Anyways, I have a turbo now and it's the best.

There pictures of both setups here http://www.cardomain.com/ride/416517
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2009 | 06:20 PM
  #23  
84stock's Avatar
Thread Starter
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 5,547
Likes: 12
From: calgary
210rwhp was achieved with a microtech, we are losing focus here
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2009 | 07:14 PM
  #24  
elwood's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,588
Likes: 46
From: Michigan
I like the look of the scoop -- offset and all. Since it's a muscle car thang -- I think your car would look better butched up a little. An OEM FB is a sleek looking car, but with the SC, you need more of a muscular look. Montana Kid's car was butch enough to pull it off right. I'm thinking wheel flares, a chin spoiler, and a flat rear spoiler (NASCAR-style).
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2009 | 09:55 AM
  #25  
eViLjAy's Avatar
mustang hunter
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
From: Iowa
+1 for the scoop. Forget about being a sleeper at that point but that is sexy!!
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:13 PM.