Same oil filter for 12A Rotary and Miata???
Local parts supplier just told me the oil filter for a 12A rotary is the same as the oil filter currently specified for the Miata. Can anyone confirm of deny this? Thanks
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,796
Likes: 3,210
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Trending Topics
At then end of the day my guess is I could use the Purolator Miata filter on my 80 RX-7 and never know the difference. It is also possible that Purolator is wrong. If someone has facts that show Purolator is wrong please post them. I don't consider Mazda using the same number for multiple vehicles proof that that is the optimum setup. To me it indicates that was determined to be the most economical solution for Mazda.
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,796
Likes: 3,210
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
I'm not sure Purlolator is wrong. It could be that Purolator is exceeding OEM specification on the RX-7 filter. The filter Purolator calls out for 80-92 RX-7s (79s are a different number and FDs use the same number as a Miata) has a bigger diameter can than the Miata filter. The sealing surfaces are the same. I am assuming the RX-7 part number has a larger filter area because of the larger diameter. I have assumed, but never tried to verify, that the bigger diameter filter wouldn't fit on a Miata. I have used the RX-7 number on my '80 based on the assumption it would filter slightly better and/or have less pressure drop than the Miata number. Mazda calling out the same number (based off the foxed.ca parts manuals which may or may not be up to date 79s might get a different filter) may be more for cost savings than performance reasons.
At then end of the day my guess is I could use the Purolator Miata filter on my 80 RX-7 and never know the difference. It is also possible that Purolator is wrong. If someone has facts that show Purolator is wrong please post them. I don't consider Mazda using the same number for multiple vehicles proof that that is the optimum setup. To me it indicates that was determined to be the most economical solution for Mazda.
At then end of the day my guess is I could use the Purolator Miata filter on my 80 RX-7 and never know the difference. It is also possible that Purolator is wrong. If someone has facts that show Purolator is wrong please post them. I don't consider Mazda using the same number for multiple vehicles proof that that is the optimum setup. To me it indicates that was determined to be the most economical solution for Mazda.
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,495
Likes: 1,484
From: West Coast
Every Mazda I've owned has had interchangeable oil filters. One thing I caught onto a few years ago was:
A filter out of a 2000 626 fits an NB Miata, a 3rd gen Protege, and a 2nd /3rd gen RX-7, but it's about 1/3 bigger than the stock ones (which are all the same size).
I've been running 626 filters for years with absolutely no problems. Wix is the brand I buy.
A filter out of a 2000 626 fits an NB Miata, a 3rd gen Protege, and a 2nd /3rd gen RX-7, but it's about 1/3 bigger than the stock ones (which are all the same size).
I've been running 626 filters for years with absolutely no problems. Wix is the brand I buy.
Every Mazda I've owned has had interchangeable oil filters. One thing I caught onto a few years ago was:
A filter out of a 2000 626 fits an NB Miata, a 3rd gen Protege, and a 2nd /3rd gen RX-7, but it's about 1/3 bigger than the stock ones (which are all the same size).
I've been running 626 filters for years with absolutely no problems. Wix is the brand I buy.
A filter out of a 2000 626 fits an NB Miata, a 3rd gen Protege, and a 2nd /3rd gen RX-7, but it's about 1/3 bigger than the stock ones (which are all the same size).
I've been running 626 filters for years with absolutely no problems. Wix is the brand I buy.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
alphawolff
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
17
Nov 17, 2015 05:57 PM
KAL797
Test Area 51
0
Aug 11, 2015 03:47 PM







How's it going?
so few of us "old timers" running around

