rx8 test drive
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: South Florida
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
rx8 test drive
The good - It's a sexy car. Loved the metallic green they had with the two tone black and beige leather. Comfy seats and optically soothing interior. Reved pretty quickly. Hmm, the engine felt nice.
The bad - I took it around some corners at decent speeds. The car didn't feel connected to the road. Sorta felt like i was floating, took the corners pretty well though. Wasn't anywhere near as fast as i thought it would be.
The indifferent - the clutch was really light. When i got back into my car to drive after testing the rx8, my stock clutch felt heavy as hell.
Well, im gonna be giving up my car soon. It was the first time i ever drove a rotary and i liked it, alot. I didn't expect it to rev so smooth. I guess im a lil spoiled by my car in the handling department with koni yellows, eibach sportlines, and itr rear sway. Im looking into getting a 1st gen rx7 to replace it for a while. I def want my next car to be able to handle as well as my teg, even if it isn't fast. Anyone have any advice for me bout the rx7 or anyother car to look into.
The bad - I took it around some corners at decent speeds. The car didn't feel connected to the road. Sorta felt like i was floating, took the corners pretty well though. Wasn't anywhere near as fast as i thought it would be.
The indifferent - the clutch was really light. When i got back into my car to drive after testing the rx8, my stock clutch felt heavy as hell.
Well, im gonna be giving up my car soon. It was the first time i ever drove a rotary and i liked it, alot. I didn't expect it to rev so smooth. I guess im a lil spoiled by my car in the handling department with koni yellows, eibach sportlines, and itr rear sway. Im looking into getting a 1st gen rx7 to replace it for a while. I def want my next car to be able to handle as well as my teg, even if it isn't fast. Anyone have any advice for me bout the rx7 or anyother car to look into.
#4
Back from the dead
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Stockton, Ca
Posts: 236
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
it really does. i mean, its no fd. but considering the fact that its more comfortable, hauls twice as many people,and all that electronic goodies, its not a bad handling car. ive driven a 350z and i think the 8 is more "tosseable"(did i spell that right?) if that's not enough for you, wait til 06 when the real 2 door comes out.
#5
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: South Florida
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i didn't push it to its limits, the salesman was with me. Im just comparing it to how my car handles and how the road feels. Prob with stiffer springs and shocks i'd feel different.
#7
Back from the dead
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Stockton, Ca
Posts: 236
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
first gens are great!!! hehehe, i just got one. stock though, dont expect superior performance ala fd. but the feel and the joy of driving is awesome. ask any first gen owner.
i still want an fd though
i still want an fd though
Trending Topics
#8
add to cart
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Saskatoon, SK & Montreal, PQ
Posts: 4,180
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If you go 1st gen, get an 84-85 GSL-SE. Fuel injection, 13B engine, stiffer suspension, etc.
I think the RX-8 needs a thicker front swaybar for spirited driving, but other than that it's great
I think the RX-8 needs a thicker front swaybar for spirited driving, but other than that it's great
#10
I'd go with the carb (which just so happens to be in my '82). It's always easier and cheaper to make tuning changes with a carb that F.I.
As for handling, I can only tell you what I know from mine, which is basically stock with some new struts and Toyo tires. It handles like a dream. I've taken it through many mountain passes over 80mph in turns suggesting 40mph, and it acts like the turn doesn't exist. This 1st gen is the best handling car I've had.
As for handling, I can only tell you what I know from mine, which is basically stock with some new struts and Toyo tires. It handles like a dream. I've taken it through many mountain passes over 80mph in turns suggesting 40mph, and it acts like the turn doesn't exist. This 1st gen is the best handling car I've had.
#11
brilliantly stupid
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Rockford, IL
Posts: 1,100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I wish I could test drive on of these things, but when I went to the dealership, they made it seem like even THEY had to have special permission to take them out for a spin.
#12
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
iTrader: (52)
Huh!! Fb's can be made to handle pretty seriously. I have ridden in a widebody with full race suspension and it was insane!!
As far as the Rx8 goes, I only sat in one. They are Ok I guess, but worth no ways near the cost they are asking. I supose people buy them because they are new, don't want to work on cars, and like rotarys. There is NO way I would buy one even if I had the money. Not worth it at all. Apart from being new, its a car that does the same if not less as an FD for 2-3 times the money. Or I could spend 1/3 of the Rx8 money on my FB and the result would be no comparison in performance
As far as the Rx8 goes, I only sat in one. They are Ok I guess, but worth no ways near the cost they are asking. I supose people buy them because they are new, don't want to work on cars, and like rotarys. There is NO way I would buy one even if I had the money. Not worth it at all. Apart from being new, its a car that does the same if not less as an FD for 2-3 times the money. Or I could spend 1/3 of the Rx8 money on my FB and the result would be no comparison in performance
#13
add to cart
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Saskatoon, SK & Montreal, PQ
Posts: 4,180
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by XLR8
its a car that does the same if not less as an FD for 2-3 times the money.
its a car that does the same if not less as an FD for 2-3 times the money.
What 'less' is it accomplishing? Carrying capacity? nope. Reliability? definately not. Straight line acceleration? Maybe, but a used sportbike, by that logic, accomplishes the same, if not more than, an FD for 2-3 times less.
Comparing the RX-8 to an RX-7, irrespective of generation, is silly. It's a 4 door sports sedan. The only thing it has in common with the RX-7 is a rotary engine. Period. If it had a V-6 no one would talk about 'compared to an FD...'
In addition, any new car is going to cost more than a used car. An FD in North America is at least a few years old, and the FD has a reputation (partly deserved) for being unreliable, so of course it's going to sell for far below a brand new, warrantied vehicle.
The FD new cost more than the RX-8, so if comparing sticker prices be fair. The FD, FC, FB, and SA are all small sports cars that aren't even in the same market segment as the RX-8.
Compare the RX-8 against, say, the new BMW 3 series (a more direct comparison) and bang-for-the-buck becomes apparent.
#14
Back from the dead
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Stockton, Ca
Posts: 236
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
precisely! and its all ford's fault! if ford didnt tell mazda they could only build a four seat car, we probably would be blessed with a proper successor to the RX-7. stupid blue oval...
#16
Uchinanchu
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 937
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
precisely! and its all ford's fault! if ford didnt tell mazda they could only build a four seat car, we probably would be blessed with a proper successor to the RX-7. stupid blue oval...
#17
EliteHardcoreCannuckSquad
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Acton, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 4,126
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
None of the RX-7's was ever a true 4 seater. You ever spent any time in the rear of an RX-7?
They're a 2+2, only because Japanese law required it when the SA first came out.
[qoute]precisely! and its all ford's fault! if ford didnt tell mazda they could only build a four seat car, we probably would be blessed with a proper successor to the RX-7. stupid blue oval...[/quote]
Really? If it wern't for Ford, Mazda would likely have folded. Then where would we be?
It's not Fords fault that the FD was a horrible failure and seriously hurt Mazda in North America.
Ford has the deep pockets that kept Mazda going until they could build us a new rotary.
Mazda needs to prove that the Rotary can power a sporty, yet reliable, practical car.
That's what the RX-8 is. Mazda has NEVER claimed it's a replacement for the RX-7. Assuming the RX-8 does well, we MIGHT get a new RX-7.
They're a 2+2, only because Japanese law required it when the SA first came out.
[qoute]precisely! and its all ford's fault! if ford didnt tell mazda they could only build a four seat car, we probably would be blessed with a proper successor to the RX-7. stupid blue oval...[/quote]
Really? If it wern't for Ford, Mazda would likely have folded. Then where would we be?
It's not Fords fault that the FD was a horrible failure and seriously hurt Mazda in North America.
Ford has the deep pockets that kept Mazda going until they could build us a new rotary.
Mazda needs to prove that the Rotary can power a sporty, yet reliable, practical car.
That's what the RX-8 is. Mazda has NEVER claimed it's a replacement for the RX-7. Assuming the RX-8 does well, we MIGHT get a new RX-7.
#18
Back from the dead
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Stockton, Ca
Posts: 236
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
actually, ford did dictate that the only way mazda could bring another rotary in NA was if it was practical enough for family use(with small kids). that is why they had to design the 8 with 4 seats and 4 doors. im not saying that ford is bad, i work for one of their dealerships, but remember the rx01 concept? it had 2 seats and performed just as good, if not better, than the fd. that could have been the rx8 we were supposed to have. well, now we could just hope that 8 sales is good enough for ford to ok a 2 door pure sports car.
#19
Yeah, shutup kid.
Originally posted by faye x7
I wish I could test drive on of these things, but when I went to the dealership, they made it seem like even THEY had to have special permission to take them out for a spin.
I wish I could test drive on of these things, but when I went to the dealership, they made it seem like even THEY had to have special permission to take them out for a spin.
I can't say what dealer it was, or who there gave me the test drive, since he would get into trouble if his boss found out, and he doesn't want everyone coming and asking him to drive one.
#20
Back from the dead
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Stockton, Ca
Posts: 236
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
yea, mazda dealerships have what they call "test vehicles"(i think all dealerships do) and when it gets to a certain amount of miles(around 30k) it gets auctioned off to dealerships and sold as used cars, even if its still the same year.
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Easton, PA
Posts: 252
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think its funny how you guys talk about ford as if they are responsible for taking away the rx-7 in North America.
The truth is, it is Mazda's fault. They gave americans a car they couldnt handle, and didnt want. Because of that, sales dropped, and the car needed to be removed from america.
Ford simply made the same decision mazda would have made if they were still in charge.
Face it, our car evolved into disaster. And Mazda is responsible for its failure.
Now we all still love our car, and our engine, and personally i would love to own a fd some day, but why should we make a scapegoat out of ford? They did what any of us would have done, if we were buisness men trying to run a company in a highly competitive market.
Also, as mentioned before, ford prevented mazda from folding. So we all should still be thankful we can still get parts and help from dealerships(malloy mazda being the #1 example).
So thats my opinion on the "lets blame ford because no-one likes their cars anyway" topic.
The truth is, it is Mazda's fault. They gave americans a car they couldnt handle, and didnt want. Because of that, sales dropped, and the car needed to be removed from america.
Ford simply made the same decision mazda would have made if they were still in charge.
Face it, our car evolved into disaster. And Mazda is responsible for its failure.
Now we all still love our car, and our engine, and personally i would love to own a fd some day, but why should we make a scapegoat out of ford? They did what any of us would have done, if we were buisness men trying to run a company in a highly competitive market.
Also, as mentioned before, ford prevented mazda from folding. So we all should still be thankful we can still get parts and help from dealerships(malloy mazda being the #1 example).
So thats my opinion on the "lets blame ford because no-one likes their cars anyway" topic.
#22
Back from the dead
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Stockton, Ca
Posts: 236
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
okay, first of all i work for ford. and if they didnt make such shitty cars, id be out of work. next, mazda builds great cars. just because the general american public cant take the "sports car spirit" doesnt mean its otherwise. look everyswhere else in the world where they enjoy great, fun-to-drive cars we all lust for. if the RX-7 stayed in the US for another couple of years, we would have seen great improvements that would have made it a success story. and maybe we could see spirit 7s running around the streets. anyway, ford isnt all the blame, just partially. as the parent company, they are only doing what they think is best for mazda. instead of leaping into the sports car wagon with another rotary, they wanted to test the waters first with the RX-8.
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Easton, PA
Posts: 252
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
anyway, ford isnt all the blame, just partially. as the parent company, they are only doing what they think is best for mazda. instead of leaping into the sports car wagon with another rotary, they wanted to test the waters first with the RX-8.
#25
love the braaaap
I think you all miss the point. By reading this thread, you guys think that the RX-8 is the replacement for the 7. It is in no way a replacement. It wasn't ment to be better than the FD. If you ask me, I think Mazda is using it as a test platform to see if Rotaries will sell in North America. Once they decide on that, only THEN will the RX-7 replacement come.