1st Generation Specific (1979-1985) 1979-1985 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections

RE-Speed : Lightweight Shock Replacement

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-28-11, 03:04 PM
  #1  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
Re-Speed.com's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: London, Ontario
Posts: 2,483
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Lightbulb RE-Speed : Lightweight Shock Replacement

Still need to put them up to the test, the ones I've built here will not work with the stock bumper as it does not have the holes to bolt through it, and that version will have a slightly thicker and longer C channel welded onto it (Most likely 3/16" thick vs the 1/8" thick shown here). The reason I did this one as such is because my Mariah front bumper doesn't fit into the stock shock C channel, I had to cut it back.

Anyhow to the good stuff, the replacements are 2.5lb in weight savings each, weighing in at a mere 0.5lb. Here's a couple pictures of it, let me know if you guys would be interested in more items such as this:







Sorry for the bad cell phone pictures, left the camera at home today.
Attached Thumbnails RE-Speed : Lightweight Shock Replacement-imag0076.jpg   RE-Speed : Lightweight Shock Replacement-imag0077.jpg   RE-Speed : Lightweight Shock Replacement-imag0078.jpg  
Old 06-28-11, 03:42 PM
  #2  
Lives on the Forum

 
Kentetsu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Grand Rapids Michigan
Posts: 11,359
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts
Sam, I just might need a set of those.

Just for your sake, is there any problem (potential lawsuit) with modifying a safety device like that? I hope not, because I like it, but I'd hate to see you get into a jam over something like that...



.
Old 06-28-11, 03:58 PM
  #3  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
iTrader: (2)
 
dj55b's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: London, Ontario
Posts: 6,122
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Hey Mark ,

I'll shoot one over your way for testing. As for legal issues, yes there is and there will be a disclaimer saying its only for off road purposes. In all honesty all those do is take a bit of impact at very low speeds, if you hit something at 60mph or so those will do next to nothing.
Old 06-28-11, 07:37 PM
  #4  
DIRTY RX

 
mazdaspeedrex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Omaha, NE
Posts: 395
Received 16 Likes on 8 Posts
Not really SCCA CSP legal but who's going to look there? I might be interested also. As long as they fit the stock bumper.
Old 06-29-11, 08:50 AM
  #5  
Waffles - hmmm good

iTrader: (1)
 
t_g_farrell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Lake Wylie, N.C.
Posts: 8,783
Received 282 Likes on 232 Posts
Originally Posted by dj55b
Hey Mark ,

I'll shoot one over your way for testing. As for legal issues, yes there is and there will be a disclaimer saying its only for off road purposes. In all honesty all those do is take a bit of impact at very low speeds, if you hit something at 60mph or so those will do next to nothing.
I know from experience they work well up to about 30 mph and saved my car from
any real damage except the headlights were up and they got tweaked a bit. Bumper
popped back out and after I pulled on the headlight buckets a bit, you couldn't tell
I'd had an accident. The other car got its entire rear bumper skin torn off and was
laying on the ground. This was in about 87 and it was one of those Pontiac
Grand Ams. It was a chain reaction panic stop in the snow back when my car was
a DD in Pittsburgh.

Now SA bumbers, those are heavy. I hear folks mount FB bumper shells on SAs to get
rid of the extra weight. These would help there I'm sure.
Old 06-29-11, 10:03 AM
  #6  
Moderator

iTrader: (3)
 
j9fd3s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Posts: 30,802
Received 2,577 Likes on 1,831 Posts
Originally Posted by t_g_farrell

Now SA bumbers, those are heavy. I hear folks mount FB bumper shells on SAs to get
rid of the extra weight. These would help there I'm sure.
if you look at the JDM cars, they almost all have put the FB front bumper, or a fiberglass one on. the odd part is that the FB guys seem to want to run SA REAR bumpers.
Old 06-29-11, 11:19 AM
  #7  
Lives on the Forum

iTrader: (5)
 
84stock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: calgary
Posts: 5,537
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 5 Posts
I don't like the idea of compromising a designed safety device.


Kind of like replacing the plastic sheer pins in the steering column with steel roll pins
Old 06-29-11, 11:30 AM
  #8  
Once a Marine.....
iTrader: (26)
 
patmac6075's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: MKE WI
Posts: 722
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by 84stock
I don't like the idea of compromising a designed safety device.


Kind of like replacing the plastic sheer pins in the steering column with steel roll pins
With all due respect, I'd have to disagree.
First off, this is not a part that is being "mandated" that you replace, secondly, it is sold specifically as an "off-road/racing" part, and finally, soooo many more cars being boosted, blown, ported, or otherwise "race prepped" without regard to brakes/suspension/routine maintained/other safety mods.....makes this seem kind of trivial....
just my $.02
Old 06-29-11, 11:34 AM
  #9  
Lives on the Forum

 
Kentetsu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Grand Rapids Michigan
Posts: 11,359
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts
Hm, I wonder if you could shorten those and get a "tucked in" bumper look. I think I remember something about people drilling a hole in the shock, then compressing it, so that the bumper would be in further. From what I remember, it looked pretty cool too.
Old 06-29-11, 04:09 PM
  #10  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
Re-Speed.com's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: London, Ontario
Posts: 2,483
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Finished the other side last night and powder coated them real quick, finished at 2am ... Here's a couple shots of the finished product.

As for "safety", these will still take some of the impact by binding the aluminum pieces vs transferring the energy to the frame and kinking that. The reason I wrote "safety" is because I personally do not see them as a real safety measure, but more a product to reduce damage to the frame from smaller accidents. So instead of having to straighten the chassis, you would just replace these and smaller pieces. Doing some quick google searching most of them are rated from 5-15mph accidents.





On another note, they don't seem to be to safe for fire fighters ...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NPajWzThRy4
Attached Thumbnails RE-Speed : Lightweight Shock Replacement-re-speed-084.jpg   RE-Speed : Lightweight Shock Replacement-re-speed-085.jpg  
Old 06-29-11, 04:14 PM
  #11  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
Re-Speed.com's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: London, Ontario
Posts: 2,483
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
http://www.nhtsa.gov/cars/problems/s...per/index.html

Found a good article to prove my point
1) What is a bumper?


A bumper is a shield made of steel, aluminum, rubber, or plastic that is mounted on the front and rear of a passenger car. When a low speed collision occurs, the bumper system absorbs the shock to prevent or reduce damage to the car. Some bumpers use energy absorbers or brackets and others are made with a foam cushioning material.


2) What is the purpose of bumpers?


The car bumper is designed to prevent or reduce physical damage to the front and rear ends of passenger motor vehicles in low-speed collisions. Automobile bumpers are not typically designed to be structural components that would significantly contribute to vehicle crashworthiness or occupant protection during front or rear collisions. It is not a safety feature intended to prevent or mitigate injury severity to occupants in the passenger cars. Bumpers are designed to protect the hood, trunk, grille, fuel, exhaust and cooling system as well as safety related equipment such as parking lights, headlamps and taillights in low speed collisions.

Last edited by Re-Speed.com; 06-29-11 at 04:16 PM.
Old 06-29-11, 05:05 PM
  #12  
Moderator

iTrader: (3)
 
j9fd3s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Posts: 30,802
Received 2,577 Likes on 1,831 Posts
while i kind of feel weird about removing a "safety" device, one has to remember that the JDM cars actually have a bracket like this instead of the shock.

also you have to think about how big the crumple zone of the car still is, my triumph has the steering box right behind the front bumper, with a solid steering column, which means if you hit anything you're dead. the Rx7 has the steering box BEHIND the front wheels, so you have to bend like half the car before the steering column will even move.

so impact on safety is probably minimal, and indeed that's how the car was sold in some markets. the JDM cars also lack the big bar in the doors that we get, at least for a while.
Old 06-29-11, 06:33 PM
  #13  
the name is Stan

iTrader: (1)
 
Rotary-MG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Sunny So. Calif
Posts: 340
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 1 Post
I love the weight saving philosophy behind what you are trying to do this these parts.
You should list out all the weight savings parts you've come up with just to see the potential totals savings.

I think that calling the shock a safety device is an overstatement. It's more of a consumer protection consideration so that when touching a pole in the parking lot you won't cause yourself $1000 worth of damage. I think about the SUV's that have the spare tire on the back hatch. If you back one of those things into a parking lot pole at 3 mph you will destroy the back hatch since the spare tire is above the rear bumper. I saw some video of these tests on TV, and the damage was upwards to $10,000 or more depending on the suv.

Legal wise, what's so different about doing this mod vs. the nerf bumpers and brush guards that people put on their trucks? I had those double 4" round steel nerf bars on a Toyota mini-pick-up, and I think it saved me from many parking lot repairs in college. There were at least 4 instances when I could definitely tell that someone hit my truck, but I had no damage. Someone once left their license plate jammed onto my bumper. Another time my truck was moved around in the parking stall. There may still have been crumple zones, but it was on the other guy's car.

If you want a safe car in a collision, then what are u doing with an RX7? Plenty of cars now a days with air bags all around and doors that can't stick you arm out of.

The guys recording the car fire.....Canadians eh?

Takes a lot of water to put out a car fire!
Suddenly my fire extinguisher seem inadequate.

Last edited by Rotary-MG; 06-29-11 at 06:39 PM. Reason: >o<
Old 06-29-11, 09:05 PM
  #14  
DIRTY RX

 
mazdaspeedrex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Omaha, NE
Posts: 395
Received 16 Likes on 8 Posts
Mythbusters did an episode on the exploding bumper shocks.

http://mythbustersresults.com/exploding-bumper
Old 07-01-11, 04:38 AM
  #15  
emissions r teh sux

iTrader: (2)
 
rotornoob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Stockton Ca
Posts: 888
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
if you can make them fit the stock bumper i might be interested in a set or 2
Old 07-01-11, 08:14 AM
  #16  
79 w 13B4port

iTrader: (5)
 
rwatson5651's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Alabama
Posts: 1,905
Received 52 Likes on 29 Posts
If they will fit an SA you can send me two,(or four if they will work on the rear as well).

My SA Bumpers are heavy as hell and I like the idea of saving the weight, especially way out at the end, thats a long moment of inertia.

Plans for a stock appearing fiberglass SA bumpers? You could save some serious weight in a very beneficial location........
Old 07-01-11, 09:21 AM
  #17  
Lives on the Forum

 
Kentetsu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Grand Rapids Michigan
Posts: 11,359
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts
And I'm still waiting for a decent exhaust system Sam...

And how about a real live fully functional front air dam? You'd better hire some help buddy. lol
Old 07-01-11, 12:47 PM
  #18  
Out In the Barn


iTrader: (9)
 
KansasCityREPU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: KC
Posts: 6,050
Received 1,013 Likes on 799 Posts
I guess you could always drill a series of holes around the shaft to make a weak link crinkle zone. This way it would collapse and absorb some of the energy from a crash.
Old 07-01-11, 01:02 PM
  #19  
Rx2 > FD

iTrader: (10)
 
sen2two's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Florida, Orlando
Posts: 3,359
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by Kentetsu
Hm, I wonder if you could shorten those and get a "tucked in" bumper look. I think I remember something about people drilling a hole in the shock, then compressing it, so that the bumper would be in further. From what I remember, it looked pretty cool too.
Very interesting... Pics of this? I thought about tucking the bumpers before. But never got around to attempting it. I never even thought people done this before on a 1st gen.
Old 07-01-11, 05:21 PM
  #20  
Lives on the Forum

iTrader: (5)
 
84stock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: calgary
Posts: 5,537
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by patmac6075
With all due respect, I'd have to disagree.
First off, this is not a part that is being "mandated" that you replace, secondly, it is sold specifically as an "off-road/racing" part, and finally, soooo many more cars being boosted, blown, ported, or otherwise "race prepped" without regard to brakes/suspension/routine maintained/other safety mods.....makes this seem kind of trivial....
just my $.02
Good reply! Agreed
Old 07-01-11, 06:45 PM
  #21  
1st-Class Engine Janitor

iTrader: (15)
 
DivinDriver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Chino Hills, CA
Posts: 8,376
Received 26 Likes on 24 Posts
Those firemen either need a longer hose, or they need to worry less about scratching up their pretty truck and park closer.

Looked like they were forced too close to the vehicle by lack of hose reach.
Old 07-02-11, 03:13 PM
  #22  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
Re-Speed.com's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: London, Ontario
Posts: 2,483
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Group buy Started:

https://www.rx7club.com/showthread.p...3#post10689503
Old 07-02-11, 04:31 PM
  #23  
Leave my avatar alone!!!

iTrader: (8)
 
rotarycrazy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Spartanburg SC
Posts: 1,656
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I would be interested in a set for an SA bumper to FB chasy that way i dont have to make my own
Old 07-02-11, 05:30 PM
  #24  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
Re-Speed.com's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: London, Ontario
Posts: 2,483
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
If anyone has an SA shock bumper to take a couple measurements off of for me and maybe a couple of pictures, then I can most certainly try and accommodate something of such.
Old 07-02-11, 05:34 PM
  #25  
Rotary Supremacist

iTrader: (1)
 
LizardFC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Maryville, TN
Posts: 2,909
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I would also be interested in a tucked set if you made one. I hate the way the stock bumper sticks out so far. Your part looks nice and the price is right


Quick Reply: RE-Speed : Lightweight Shock Replacement



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:09 AM.