1st Generation Specific (1979-1985) 1979-1985 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections

racing beat motor mounts

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 17, 2007 | 06:44 PM
  #1  
brandon davis's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 964
Likes: 1
From: Washington
racing beat motor mounts

So i recieved 2 racing beat motor mounts today. when i compared them to the original gslse mounts my left SE mount is thicker but both RB ones are the same thickness. I check there site and it says you have to order them in a pair same part number. Is this OK???
Reply
Old May 17, 2007 | 07:50 PM
  #2  
Re-Speed.com's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,483
Likes: 1
From: London, Ontario
Yes, that is the norm for aftermarket mounts.


-billy
Reply
Old May 17, 2007 | 10:28 PM
  #3  
brandon davis's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 964
Likes: 1
From: Washington
The stock left hand is like 5/8 thicker than the RB one though. What is this added thikness for then?
Reply
Old May 18, 2007 | 11:05 AM
  #4  
Jeff20B's Avatar
Lapping = Fapping
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 15,725
Likes: 91
From: Near Seattle
Probably because the GSL-SE engine is heavier on one side due to AC/PS etc. Or maybe because it was torquier than the 12A and Mazda figured they'd compensate for it with a thicker mount on one side. I wouldn't worry about it unless the engine sits noticeably tilted.

I installed some RB competition mounts on the '83 and it sits level as far as I can tell.
Reply
Old May 18, 2007 | 11:50 AM
  #5  
trochoid's Avatar
Old Fart Young at Heart
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 15,145
Likes: 8
From: St Joe MO
The difference in thickness is to allow the engine to be level in the engine bay.
Reply
Old May 18, 2007 | 01:10 PM
  #6  
brandon davis's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 964
Likes: 1
From: Washington
If you pros say so!
Reply
Old May 28, 2007 | 08:45 PM
  #7  
brandon davis's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 964
Likes: 1
From: Washington
So after installin the motor and tightening the nuts down i noticied.
1. with both mounts being the same height that the motor crossmember would not sit flush on the RB mounts with the mounts duplicating stock orientation?
2. Crossmember would only sit remotly as flush to mount as possible with both mounts 180'd around(mount notch up)?
3. Once engine was in and tight, left side which is the side stock is considerably thicker made the engine sit cockeyed to the left side and oil pan close to the frames crossmember?
I did a bit of searching and read that some have it like this and others have modified to make the oil pan not so close. Who has some pics or advice again on this topic for me would be great.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cristoDathird
Introduce yourself
28
May 30, 2019 08:47 PM
CaptainKRM
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
14
Aug 26, 2015 09:52 PM
GrossPolluter
General Rotary Tech Support
7
Aug 22, 2015 11:23 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:04 AM.