Question re: FB Factory Original spoilers
#1
Certified Old Fart
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Inkerman, On, South of Ottawa, the 2nd coldest Capital in the World
Posts: 490
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Question re: FB Factory Original spoilers
Does anybody know which of these two is the "factory original" REAR spoiler?
1 piece urethane wrap around
3 piece fibreglass wrap around
I only want to put whatever was factory available at the time of production on my -se, so I want to be sure I buy the correct spoiler. I have found one of each for sale, and don't want to hold up either seller waiting on me.
BTW, If anybody has the factory orignal front spoiler with driving lights - I'm looking for one!
Hopefully some of you true guru's will know the answer to this one!
Thx
Rob
1 piece urethane wrap around
3 piece fibreglass wrap around
I only want to put whatever was factory available at the time of production on my -se, so I want to be sure I buy the correct spoiler. I have found one of each for sale, and don't want to hold up either seller waiting on me.
BTW, If anybody has the factory orignal front spoiler with driving lights - I'm looking for one!
Hopefully some of you true guru's will know the answer to this one!
Thx
Rob
#2
Rotors still spinning
iTrader: (1)
Both I and my friend have what we both believe to be the factory option rear spoilers on our 1st gens and both of ours are 3 piece fiberglass. Neither of us are the original owners though. He bought his from a rotary fanatic who did alot to the car and claims it's the factory spoiler. I bought mine from a little old lady who bought the car new and didn't do anything else aftermarket. To me it seems like they are the fiberglass pieces but that would be the only time I've ever seen the factory use fiberglass. Don't go solely by what I'm saying as I'm not 100% sure. I would also like to know just to put my mind at rest.
#7
Savanna Rx-7
Originally Posted by trochoid
The original is 3 piece hard, not soft.
also the front one was never available over here as a factory option, but many people got them from aftermarket places and had them mounted soon after buying the car.
kenn
Trending Topics
#8
Certified Old Fart
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Inkerman, On, South of Ottawa, the 2nd coldest Capital in the World
Posts: 490
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Bump for more opinions.
Seems like fibreglass 3 piece wins out right now, but according to kenn chan above it seems like either one may be correct.....any more experts out there?
Seems like fibreglass 3 piece wins out right now, but according to kenn chan above it seems like either one may be correct.....any more experts out there?
#9
Certified Old Fart
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Inkerman, On, South of Ottawa, the 2nd coldest Capital in the World
Posts: 490
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
BUMP again. I really need to be sure here, and even the long time forum members seem to have differring opinions.
Help me out here guys. I don't want to put anything not factory original on my -se!
Help me out here guys. I don't want to put anything not factory original on my -se!
#10
Savanna Rx-7
Originally Posted by Whanrow
BUMP again. I really need to be sure here, and even the long time forum members seem to have differring opinions.
Help me out here guys. I don't want to put anything not factory original on my -se!
Help me out here guys. I don't want to put anything not factory original on my -se!
Like I said I am not sure about the states, and I would vote for the fiberglass (FRP) as being correct for the states, but the reason they had the urethane ones over here was some dumb *** law that if a car wrecked and glass, plastic, or FRP shattered and threw debris it could only throw X amount of debris, so most makers avoided FRP over here for stock applications, with the new polyurethane type bumpers that problem was eliminated over here.
#12
OK here ya go guys:
A Mazda ad out of Rotary Rocket, 1985. (sorry my scanner isn't big enough to fit both pages).
The front airdam and rear wraparound spoiler were part of the "Mazda Finish Line" accessories.
Made of hard polyurethane and both were three piece (I've had two of the spoilers) These things are heavier than fiberglass and much more sturdier.
A Mazda ad out of Rotary Rocket, 1985. (sorry my scanner isn't big enough to fit both pages).
The front airdam and rear wraparound spoiler were part of the "Mazda Finish Line" accessories.
Made of hard polyurethane and both were three piece (I've had two of the spoilers) These things are heavier than fiberglass and much more sturdier.
#13
Certified Old Fart
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Inkerman, On, South of Ottawa, the 2nd coldest Capital in the World
Posts: 490
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by RacerX7fb
The front airdam and rear wraparound spoiler were part of the "Mazda Finish Line" accessories.
Made of hard polyurethane and both were three piece (I've had two of the spoilers) These things are heavier than fiberglass and much more sturdier.
Made of hard polyurethane and both were three piece (I've had two of the spoilers) These things are heavier than fiberglass and much more sturdier.
Any way you can scan the back half of that ad to see if you can tell if its one or three piece?
Thanks
Rob
#14
Savanna Rx-7
Originally Posted by Whanrow
Priceless!!!!!!!!!!! Thanks!!!!!. Now the only problem I have is that I can get a 3 piece fibrglass, or ONE piece polyurethane. By the sound of it, the fibreglass is out, but the poly is ONE piece.
Any way you can scan the back half of that ad to see if you can tell if its one or three piece?
Thanks
Rob
Any way you can scan the back half of that ad to see if you can tell if its one or three piece?
Thanks
Rob
good research by Whanrow the one piece sounds like the one here in Japan, maybe a JDM part?
kenn
#23
Apprentice Guru
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Cloud Nine and Peak of God
Posts: 1,425
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Keegan
here is a stock turbo rx7
I agree it looks like the Elford which was a private development in the UK with a TO4 turbo and SU carb, and dolled up to look more powerful than its 160hp. It had numerous problems of quality control.
The other option being a UK car, is it could be a TWR version which was more powerful but the front air dam was similar to the Elford.
Last edited by PaulFitzwarryne; 11-03-05 at 06:55 AM.
#24
Certified Old Fart
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Inkerman, On, South of Ottawa, the 2nd coldest Capital in the World
Posts: 490
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Nick1: You're right. I didn't see the fine little lines in that other photo.
RacerX7FB: Sorry, it didn't sink in as all the urethane ones I've been able to find are one piece, so your text was contradicting what I have been able to find out.
I'm wondering if SOME of the people with 3 piece THINK its fibreglass, when it actually a very hard urethane (which would have hardened more over the years).
Can anybody describe just how hard the urethane is? Is it possible to mistake for fibreglass?
RacerX7FB: Sorry, it didn't sink in as all the urethane ones I've been able to find are one piece, so your text was contradicting what I have been able to find out.
I'm wondering if SOME of the people with 3 piece THINK its fibreglass, when it actually a very hard urethane (which would have hardened more over the years).
Can anybody describe just how hard the urethane is? Is it possible to mistake for fibreglass?
#25
Lives on the Forum
I don't know man, I had to resand mine to get some chips smoothed out before I painted it. It sure as hell looked like fiberglass to me. Rock hard, and layered. I don't know, I've never worked with urethane before so maybe they are similar?