1st Generation Specific (1979-1985) 1979-1985 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections

Pulsation damper leaking... Replacement or banjo bolt? Your tought...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 15, 2007 | 11:13 PM
  #1  
RxFred's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
From: Montreal
Pulsation damper leaking... Replacement or banjo bolt? Your tought...

So my pulsation damper is leaking. I'm one of the lucky that found the problem without caughting fire...

I've done my research and found 2 solutions. Replacing with an OEM part (Mazda still carries it for 141$ Can) or putting a banjo bolt from Earl's part number 997591 (5$)
From what I understand, it helps creating pulsation momentum so the gas and injectors are on the same tone... It seems like a part that is not quite necessary but at the same time, if Mazda engineers placed it there, there is probably a good reason.

Oh dear rx7 gurus!.. what is your advice?
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2007 | 11:16 PM
  #2  
85 FB's Avatar
7-less
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,053
Likes: 0
From: No. Virginia, USA
I thought the whole deal of a pulsation damper was to dampen the pulses of the fuel?

And, I've always wondered why you can replace it with a simple banjo bolt. I'm confused about this one as well.
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2007 | 12:43 AM
  #3  
TeamSMS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 338
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Id replace it with a banjo bolt...i also caught mine before it caught fire...my PD was also leaking. Im waiting on some injectors grommets and other small things but yeah...im putting a banjo bolt in the place of my PD. I have heard some say bad things about replacing the PD with a banjo bolt...but have also talked to a lot of people that have done it and have had no problems at all since they did it. I looked around on here a lot and didnt find anybody having an actual fuel problem after replacing the PD with a banjo bolt.
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2007 | 12:10 PM
  #4  
themayor500's Avatar
Full Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
From: Palatine IL
In my opinion i would definitely go with the banjo bolt, before i did my swap I had replaced my PD twice and the second one went bad in about 10k miles, since i put the banjo bolt in i have not had the least bit of a problem with anything fuel related.
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2007 | 01:09 PM
  #5  
ratboy's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 509
Likes: 4
From: Austin, TX
I recently replaced my FPD with the banjo bolt mod and havent had any problems. I heard a few naysayers when I asked but noone that had any actual experience proving this to be a bad mod. Hardest part is making sure you get the right part (I picked up a used 86 non turbo fuel rail).

rotary resurection made a nice write up on this mod:
http://www.rotaryresurrection.com/ro...pulsation.html
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BNR34RB26DETT
Build Threads
42
Feb 28, 2018 11:27 AM
astrum
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
24
Nov 15, 2017 08:44 AM
rexone
The Bad & Fugly Businesses
2
Aug 23, 2015 06:24 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:56 PM.