1st Generation Specific (1979-1985) 1979-1985 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections

pros about a 79 manifold

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 27, 2004 | 03:52 PM
  #1  
brandon davis's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 964
Likes: 1
From: Washington
pros about a 79 manifold

i bought a 79 intake manny at the yard today it is noticably shorter intake runners and the middle ports are alot smaller than 84 85 but it looks easier to port than the 84 i think i paid 15 for it i got the oil cooler and tower as well. i was just wondering if there were any power improvements with the manny id assume a little more top end power.
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2004 | 04:39 PM
  #2  
Gregs's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,980
Likes: 0
From: KING COUNTY, WA
well since 79-85 12a's all had 101 FWHP, i dont think you will get any newfound horsepower witht he 79 mani...
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2004 | 04:53 PM
  #3  
steve84GS TII's Avatar
FB+FC=F-ME
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 3,353
Likes: 5
From: Rohnert Park CA
Easy to port,a little smoother.Probably wont increase HP, but it may shift the power slightly to a different RPM, by affecting port velocity and effeciency.
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2004 | 05:03 PM
  #4  
brandon davis's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 964
Likes: 1
From: Washington
gregs brings up a interesting topic i think, i am new to the rotary thing but from what i have learned is that the 84 85 had better compression then the earlier wouldnt that account for better something i know higher compression piston motors make more power rx7carl has flow tested the after 79 manifolds and he was dissapointed with the flow differences in each runner to me the runners look egual to one another outside with outside and inside with inside i mean i just find it a little odd that tha horsepower didnt change with the years also since didnt the 82 have a lighter flywheel i just dont think those numbers are very accurate but maybe im bringing up an old thing.
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2004 | 06:03 PM
  #5  
brandon davis's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 964
Likes: 1
From: Washington
oops i meant non 79 manny rx7carl has flow tested.
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2004 | 06:28 PM
  #6  
XLR8's Avatar
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
iTrader: (52)
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,902
Likes: 10
From: NJ
The great thing about the early manifolds is they lacked the dreaded "shutter valve" which often sticks and creates a hang during deceleration....not to mention restriction of air flow.
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2004 | 06:43 PM
  #7  
Rx7carl's Avatar
Airflow is my life
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 6,736
Likes: 2
From: Orlando, Fl
Compression ratio remained constant in the 1st gens. The early cars had lighter FW's, but heavier rotors, so that cancels out. As far as the manifold, the 79-80 has a much better plenum and less bumps and crap to interfere with the airflow. The runners arent smaller, its decieving. Look down into the 84-85 and look how the runners neck down.
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2004 | 06:50 PM
  #8  
Tom's Avatar
Tom
Whack 'em and stack 'em
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,373
Likes: 0
From: Clarksburg/Bridgeport WV- North Central Appalachia
What's the most common method for blocking the egr ports if you run a 79-80 manifold?
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2004 | 07:13 PM
  #9  
Gregs's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,980
Likes: 0
From: KING COUNTY, WA
jbweld
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2004 | 09:06 PM
  #10  
Rx7carl's Avatar
Airflow is my life
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 6,736
Likes: 2
From: Orlando, Fl
Too ghetto. I take a piece of angle aluminum and bolt it to the bottom of the manifold to block that port.
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2004 | 05:48 AM
  #11  
brandon davis's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 964
Likes: 1
From: Washington
what is my car going to do after i install a 79 manifold ported to match the gasket also what vehicles can a get a better fuel pump from than ours like any v8 carbd from the jyard would that work for a bit?
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2004 | 07:21 AM
  #12  
Tom's Avatar
Tom
Whack 'em and stack 'em
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,373
Likes: 0
From: Clarksburg/Bridgeport WV- North Central Appalachia
Originally Posted by Rx7carl
Too ghetto. I take a piece of angle aluminum and bolt it to the bottom of the manifold to block that port.
Do you use a temp rated sealant around the egr port area when installing? By chance- any pics around of this?

Also- an unrelated but related question- Can I use one of the vacuum ports on the manifold for a pcv valve/breather on the oil filler neck? Reason I ask is if I use my stock 85 manifold base plate/shield- I don't believe the vacuum holes match with the manifold.
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2004 | 11:09 AM
  #13  
Rx7carl's Avatar
Airflow is my life
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 6,736
Likes: 2
From: Orlando, Fl
Nah, just make it so its flush with the manifold parting surface and the stock gasket will do the rest.

Not sure on the PCV, but I think thats ok.
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2004 | 01:10 PM
  #14  
Jeff20B's Avatar
Lapping = Fapping
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 15,725
Likes: 91
From: Near Seattle
Here's a '79 manifold that I think has been ported.

Attached Thumbnails pros about a 79 manifold-manifold79_01.jpg  
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2004 | 01:23 PM
  #15  
Tom's Avatar
Tom
Whack 'em and stack 'em
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,373
Likes: 0
From: Clarksburg/Bridgeport WV- North Central Appalachia
Yup- that's been ported. I was thinking about port matching the 79 manifold that I have and use it with the sterling/carl carb on my stock 12A, but really don't know if it's worth it or not.

I've done a few searches on here before and came up with mixed results (port matching and porting intakes).

How's your intake project coming along, Carl?
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2004 | 01:54 PM
  #16  
Rx7carl's Avatar
Airflow is my life
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 6,736
Likes: 2
From: Orlando, Fl
Those primaries are over ported. Mine is at a virtual standstill. Now that mother nature has stopped ******* us around I can get back to testing.
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2004 | 02:26 PM
  #17  
Jeff20B's Avatar
Lapping = Fapping
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 15,725
Likes: 91
From: Near Seattle
You should see the engine it came off of. It's a streetported Pineapple Racing engine.



It looks like they used some Devcon in the EGR port. It's got 3B rear, R5 intermediate and Y front casings with '76-ish rotor housings and '83-'85 rotating assembly.
Attached Thumbnails pros about a 79 manifold-rusty.jpg  

Last edited by Jeff20B; Sep 28, 2004 at 02:29 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2004 | 05:09 PM
  #18  
brandon davis's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 964
Likes: 1
From: Washington
why do they block off the coolant holes to the intake???? with the plugs. and might i add YIKES what the hell happened to that engine?
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2004 | 05:12 PM
  #19  
brandon davis's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 964
Likes: 1
From: Washington
dont hate me cuz i dont know but are the primaries the ports in the middle of the intake manny?
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2004 | 05:30 PM
  #20  
Rx7carl's Avatar
Airflow is my life
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 6,736
Likes: 2
From: Orlando, Fl
To keep the coolant from heating the manifold. I think it was a boat anchor. Oh and that porting MAY be ok for a SP. I havent tested SP's for flow yet.

Yup, primaries are the 2 center ports.
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2004 | 09:50 PM
  #21  
Jeff20B's Avatar
Lapping = Fapping
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 15,725
Likes: 91
From: Near Seattle
It was a racing engine that had a Racing Beat old style black air cleaner assembly. Somebody left it out in the rain and water simply would collect at the concave part at the center of the lid. Then it would drip down the long stud and into the carb. The carb butterflies and everything below them was ruined due to water damage. The side plates were so bad that the metal could be scraped away with a fingernail after the rust coating was removed. At least the carbon apex seals may be reusable, as well as the rotor housings. I haven't dug deep enough yet to know.
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2004 | 02:46 AM
  #22  
brandon davis's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 964
Likes: 1
From: Washington
so how come more people dont talk about blocking off the coolant holes to manifold? can i do that on my sp 12a
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2004 | 03:13 PM
  #23  
Rx7carl's Avatar
Airflow is my life
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 6,736
Likes: 2
From: Orlando, Fl
Its not a secret subject. It comes up once in a while. Most people just dont wanna hassel with it. Sure you can. Some guys epoxy quarters over the holes. I use 20mm freeze plugs. 2 engines and only one small seep.
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2004 | 03:51 PM
  #24  
brandon davis's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 964
Likes: 1
From: Washington
is it worth it for a daily driven 7? also should the egr port be blocked off? because i scored a race car with a atkins motor and this motor had a piece of aluminum welded and smoothed to block the egr port would it be benificial to block the coolant holes as well?
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2004 | 03:56 PM
  #25  
Tom's Avatar
Tom
Whack 'em and stack 'em
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,373
Likes: 0
From: Clarksburg/Bridgeport WV- North Central Appalachia
edit- never mind. Re-read Carls post, he already mentioned it.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:51 AM.