1st Generation Specific (1979-1985) 1979-1985 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections

Piecing together a motor and have some questions.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 18, 2007 | 08:41 PM
  #1  
mikewoodkozar's Avatar
Thread Starter
Brap, Brap, Ole!
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,461
Likes: 0
From: kalamazoo, mi
Piecing together a motor and have some questions.

How hard would it be to piece together a motor?

I was thinking about slowly gathering these parts:

12A irons
GSLSE housings
FD rotating assembly

I have a very limited budget and really i am just dreaming right now, but what else would i need here considering i would be also buying a rebuild kit? I mean, i know i need a intake system, water pump, alternator, etc etc. I am just talking about the motor itself.

If this is a retarded thread and it has been discussed before, i am sorry and by all means close it!
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2007 | 08:45 PM
  #2  
Jeezus's Avatar
Stu-Tron Get Yo Groove On
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 8,482
Likes: 31
From: Huntsville AL
Curious as why the FD rotating assembly...

Make sure you have the right tools for the job first.
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2007 | 08:50 PM
  #3  
mikewoodkozar's Avatar
Thread Starter
Brap, Brap, Ole!
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,461
Likes: 0
From: kalamazoo, mi
FD rotating assembly is lighter than the TII rotating assembly i believe

I probably dont have the right tools yet and there is no time limit for this build, basically i would just collect the right parts as i go and then build it up when i had the knowledge and time. I have the rebuild DVD, but would really like someone to be there with me and hold my hand as it was rebuilt. Might enlist the help of ManInBlack as he is pretty close to where i live.
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2007 | 09:09 PM
  #4  
yetterben's Avatar
7less for now!
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,372
Likes: 0
From: eau claire
why not use the rx8 shaft. its the lightest isn't it?
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2007 | 09:27 PM
  #5  
mikewoodkozar's Avatar
Thread Starter
Brap, Brap, Ole!
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,461
Likes: 0
From: kalamazoo, mi
good idea, but i have no clue
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2007 | 11:47 PM
  #6  
84stock's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 5,547
Likes: 12
From: calgary
If you are on a budget why are you considering fd internals? get a good GSL SE core, rebuild it with streetported 12a plates, then get the racing beat intake and exhaust. The SE internals are a little heavier and same with the flywheel, but that will cut cost and provide better torque and midrange anyway, great for a street car.
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2007 | 12:30 AM
  #7  
FBsliderseven's Avatar
domokun!
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,063
Likes: 0
From: hawaii
hey i have a question for you not pertaining to the motor question. how did you get the rear to lower more?(car in your sig) im having problems trying to bring the rear down.
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2007 | 10:01 AM
  #8  
trochoid's Avatar
Old Fart Young at Heart
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 15,145
Likes: 8
From: St Joe MO
S5 rotating assembly, not FD. While the FD may be lighter, the S5 NA rotors are higher compression, unless you plan on turbo chargeing. Only FD internals, I recommend are the corner seal springs.
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2007 | 10:39 AM
  #9  
mikewoodkozar's Avatar
Thread Starter
Brap, Brap, Ole!
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,461
Likes: 0
From: kalamazoo, mi
Yes i do plan on turbo charging the car, so S5 TII internals then?

And budget wise, that is the genius of slowly putting together a motor, you dont have to shell it all out at once, lol
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2007 | 10:46 AM
  #10  
trochoid's Avatar
Old Fart Young at Heart
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 15,145
Likes: 8
From: St Joe MO
If you're turbocharging, then you can use FD internals, though the S5 parts may be easier/cheaper to find used.
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2007 | 10:49 AM
  #11  
mikewoodkozar's Avatar
Thread Starter
Brap, Brap, Ole!
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,461
Likes: 0
From: kalamazoo, mi
thanks, yeah i am just trying to get an idea of what i am going to need then slowly attack and find pats as i go along
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2007 | 12:13 PM
  #12  
Jeff20B's Avatar
Lapping = Fapping
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 15,725
Likes: 91
From: Near Seattle
S5 T2, 13BRE, 20B, FD all have 9.0 compression rotors. I'd avoid FD rotors because they tend to be weak.

I'm building a new engine for the GLC. It will consist of GSL-SE or earlier rotating parts. Wanna see who builds theirs first?
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2007 | 02:51 PM
  #13  
mikewoodkozar's Avatar
Thread Starter
Brap, Brap, Ole!
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,461
Likes: 0
From: kalamazoo, mi
i am betting on you

mine is really waiting funding because i cant find a job in this darn **** poor economy in michigan
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2007 | 03:47 PM
  #14  
dbragg's Avatar
Say hello to Mr.Wankel
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 5,962
Likes: 1
From: Cartersville, Ga
whats your goal for the engine/car? power and use wise
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2007 | 04:42 PM
  #15  
mikewoodkozar's Avatar
Thread Starter
Brap, Brap, Ole!
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,461
Likes: 0
From: kalamazoo, mi
Planning on a Judge Ito extended port
RB wrap around sidedraft intake
tweakit FI setup
stand alone
turbo hat from rotary shack
and a turbo of undecided specs at the moment, suggestions?

Power??? I have no idea and really dont care, lol. Anything over 300hp is gonna be gravy in the FB

Oh and i plan on it being the ultimate street car. As it is right now i drive the FB about 600 miles a year so it sits in the garage a lot. Truth be told i love showing it off more than i drive it, but i am sure that will be different when the frankenrotor is in there
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2007 | 04:47 PM
  #16  
84stock's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 5,547
Likes: 12
From: calgary
Originally Posted by FBsliderseven
hey i have a question for you not pertaining to the motor question. how did you get the rear to lower more?(car in your sig) im having problems trying to bring the rear down.
Racing beat springs, but I wish it was a bout 1-1 1/2 inches lower. Didn't change much in the back vs stock other than stiffening things up.
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2007 | 04:50 PM
  #17  
Dan_s_young's Avatar
Turbo widebody FB
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 3,733
Likes: 3
From: Alberta Canada
Ummm I don't understand why you guys are recommending using a S5 rotating assembaly. The S4 rotating assembaly is slightly heavier, but it has a lower compression (what really matters for power and reliability in a turbo setup). You then need a S4 front counterweight, and a lightweight flywheel and a rear counterweight (if you are using an aftermarket flywheel, which will probally end up being lighter than the S5 rotating assembaly anyways...).

I do agree with Scott that you should use the S6 corner seal springs (they are a wedge shape rather than a wire) they are a much better design. Other things to consider are a RX8 eccentric shaft (1 pound lighter) and RX8 stationary gears, they are hardened and come with windowed bearings.

Back to the compression ratio situation, think about it like this, a lower compression ratio means that you have a LARGER dish in the rotor and can put more air and fuel in the engine at a give time. Therefore you get more power because more charge is getting into your engine at any given time...
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2007 | 05:09 PM
  #18  
mikewoodkozar's Avatar
Thread Starter
Brap, Brap, Ole!
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,461
Likes: 0
From: kalamazoo, mi
good to know!
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2007 | 05:20 PM
  #19  
Siraniko's Avatar
RX for fun
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 15,926
Likes: 25
From: Socal
Im getting ready to built another motor. RX-8 rotors, eshaft, front/rear counterweight. thats a real high compression set up.
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2007 | 05:27 PM
  #20  
mikewoodkozar's Avatar
Thread Starter
Brap, Brap, Ole!
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,461
Likes: 0
From: kalamazoo, mi
are you gonna carb it?
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2007 | 06:19 PM
  #21  
trochoid's Avatar
Old Fart Young at Heart
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 15,145
Likes: 8
From: St Joe MO
NA or S4/S5 TII rotors, it's all in the tuning. Fwiw, starting with the S5 engine, the stationary gears were hardened since the NA version has an 8k redline. Hardened gears and 3 window bearings are backwards compatable too.
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2007 | 06:28 PM
  #22  
redbstd's Avatar
Red 84 SE
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
From: Port Orchard WA
not to hyjack but whos a good rotarded porter in the seattle area? and would
12a irons, SE housings, and renesis internals work?
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2007 | 06:34 PM
  #23  
stevensimon's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,575
Likes: 6
From: salt lake ut
Originally Posted by Dan_s_young
Ummm I don't understand why you guys are recommending using a S5 rotating assembaly. The S4 rotating assembaly is slightly heavier, but it has a lower compression (what really matters for power and reliability in a turbo setup). You then need a S4 front counterweight, and a lightweight flywheel and a rear counterweight (if you are using an aftermarket flywheel, which will probally end up being lighter than the S5 rotating assembaly anyways...).

I do agree with Scott that you should use the S6 corner seal springs (they are a wedge shape rather than a wire) they are a much better design. Other things to consider are a RX8 eccentric shaft (1 pound lighter) and RX8 stationary gears, they are hardened and come with windowed bearings.

Back to the compression ratio situation, think about it like this, a lower compression ratio means that you have a LARGER dish in the rotor and can put more air and fuel in the engine at a give time. Therefore you get more power because more charge is getting into your engine at any given time...
true but i used s5 na rotors for my turbo motor. the idea being that spool is much quicker and you can run lower boost numbers to get the same hp. i love this setup. my t04e hybrid spools as fast as the stock s4 turbo and out spools my brothers hybrid on the turbo motor. we are both running half a bar and i can walk him by 2nd gear.

use stock corner seals and replace the rubber insert but def get the s6 springs. for seals i would get the rotary aviation. i have never broken one and have been through a few sets of the atkins and oem seals. one tuning mishap and resulting detonation will blow the atkins/oem seals to bits.

get s5 rotors, na or turbo. s4 is heavier. s5 housings. on the s5 housings the spark plugs are farther apart vs the s4 resulting in being able to run more advanced timing. renesis e shaft and stat gears.

man i cant find the exact compressions for the different year rotors but i think this is right

s4 turbo 8.7:1
s4 na 9.5:1
s5 turbo 9.0:1
s5 na 9.7:1
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2007 | 09:52 PM
  #24  
dbragg's Avatar
Say hello to Mr.Wankel
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 5,962
Likes: 1
From: Cartersville, Ga
ill be building a 300 or so set up for my SA. to me it seems like youre going through WAY too much trouble, and WAY too much money.

you can easily hit 300hp with a S5 T2 swap and still keep the S5 ECU. ill be doing tha initially. then i may swap it over to SE rotors and a standalone, just for a little more spunk. whenever i break it apart itll also get port work.

you could EASILY spend a crap load less than youre looking at spending and have A LOT less trouble. the perks of your idea is itll look more "old school" to the untrained eye, but the untrained eye probably wouldnt even know what they were looking at anyways.

also, on the debate about rotors. S5 all the way. yes the S4 T2 have a lower compression, but that only matters if youre wanting extremely high numbers. theyre SUCK when not in boost and wont be as responsive as the S5 rotors.
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2007 | 11:23 PM
  #25  
Dan_s_young's Avatar
Turbo widebody FB
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 3,733
Likes: 3
From: Alberta Canada
I dunno I just figure that if you are using a turbo that is reaching full boost potential quickily and you will make more power with s4 rotors. I can deffinately see where your coming from. When I discussed my setup with my friend (has been building rotary engines for 20ish years) he also suggested the s4 rotors for a setup like mine.

But like the other guys mentioned it depends on your goal. If you want more HP go with the S4 rotors, and if you want a very responsive setup go with the S5.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:54 AM.