1st Generation Specific (1979-1985) 1979-1985 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections

Manual Transmission Torque Specs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 1, 2021 | 09:09 AM
  #1  
Dionysos's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2021
Posts: 7
Likes: 1
From: Ontario
Manual Transmission Torque Specs

Wondering if anyone can confirm for me some torque specs for my 1983 RX-7 GS. I'm doing an auto to manual swap, about to put the new gearbox in place, but in the FSM it doesn't specifically spell out the torque specs for the bellhousing-to-engine interface fasteners nor the trans mount-to-bracket or trans bracket-to-body interfaces (looking at the end of the FSM in "technical info" but the torque specs are also absent in the transmission section as well). As I understand it, when torque specs aren't given explicitly, you're to use the "unless otherwise specified" values right at the end, but these specs seem quite low. IIRC (I'm at work so I can't check at the moment), the bellhousing bolts are M8, which would mean only 12-20 ft·lb depending on the grade. That seems shockingly low for what I would imagine to be a high stress interface. Or is the bolt size specified in the FSM by bolt/nut size across the tool flats (meaning the bellhousing bolts aren't "8 mm", but "14 mm")?
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2021 | 11:57 AM
  #2  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Moderator
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,835
Likes: 3,233
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Bell housing bolts are M10,

for something like this i'll go look it up for a later car, the newer books are better, although the FC book isnt list this either!
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2021 | 12:40 PM
  #3  
Dionysos's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2021
Posts: 7
Likes: 1
From: Ontario
Hm alright, under "10 mm", it lists 23-40 ft·lb (again depending on bolt grade) which seems a little more sane I suppose. I'd feel good putting 30 ft·lb on each bolt, I just want to be sure that's going to provide an adequate clamping load (and that I don't break any bolts!).
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2021 | 11:59 PM
  #4  
rxtasy3's Avatar
Moderator
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 9,579
Likes: 290
From: Spartanburg, SC
don't worry yourself too much with torque specs of every little nut and bolt. the only torque specs that are of any real concern is the flywheel nut, front e-shaft bolt, and all the tension bolts that hold the engine together.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
hcaulfield57
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
6
Feb 15, 2016 07:37 PM
giarcpnw
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
2
Aug 14, 2014 09:45 AM
AzureDrake
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
2
Jul 25, 2010 02:06 PM
RenoCYM
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
1
Apr 25, 2008 12:00 AM
g prime
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
4
Mar 25, 2006 07:46 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:09 AM.