1st Generation Specific (1979-1985) 1979-1985 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections

Large Axle Small Axle

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-26-10, 12:42 PM
  #1  
Once a Marine.....
Thread Starter
iTrader: (26)
 
patmac6075's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: MKE WI
Posts: 722
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Large Axle Small Axle

I have a quick question concerning the date at which Mazda switched from small axle to large axle? My car ('83 GS) shows a production date (on the drivers door) of 9/83. Would this be considered a "later" model '83? If so, can I be positive that I have large axles?
Obviously it has drum brakes, but lately I've been considering just swapping the pumpkin and either getting a higher gear ratio or LSD (or both...KIA?).
Any recommendation....I'm not convinced that I need to swap-out the entire rear end...my opinion is the drums are sufficient for my needs, but I DO want the LSD. I'm still in the "thinking it over" stage, so I'm open to suggestion.
Thanks
Old 04-26-10, 02:14 PM
  #2  
Needs More Noise

iTrader: (12)
 
bwaits's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Georgia
Posts: 3,375
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I do not believe that is late enough to be big spline axles but you will not know for sure until you measure something.

Some older post I made and found through the search function.

Originally Posted by Re-Speed.com
If you do pull an axle, 1979-1983 splines will measure under 1" diameter and 84-85 splines will measure over 1" diameter.

-billy
Originally Posted by Re-Speed.com
You could measure the od of the axles housing where the bearing sits. It will be 3.2~"

OD if the big bearing axle housing just behind the flange will be approximately 3.2" in diameter.

Also, IIRC, if your rear end/drive shaft flange is tapped it is big axle, if it is through bolted with nuts it will be a small axle.

-billy
Old 04-26-10, 02:32 PM
  #3  
Junior Member
 
DenCon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Central Washington
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My 7/83 has small axles.
Old 04-26-10, 02:58 PM
  #4  
Super Moderator

iTrader: (3)
 
gsl-se addict's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Lynchburg, VA
Posts: 5,088
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
'83 models use the 84/85 driveshaft, but use the small axles.

'84-'85 models use the large axles

Parts fiche does not list a mid-year VIN split for the change, so you will only have large axles if you have an '84 model.

'84 models started being built in 9/83. The serial number portion of your VIN should be 800001+ to be an '84 model.
Old 04-26-10, 06:42 PM
  #5  
Moderator

iTrader: (3)
 
j9fd3s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Posts: 30,780
Received 2,565 Likes on 1,824 Posts
Originally Posted by gsl-se addict
'83 models use the 84/85 driveshaft, but use the small axles.

'84-'85 models use the large axles

Parts fiche does not list a mid-year VIN split for the change, so you will only have large axles if you have an '84 model.

'84 models started being built in 9/83. The serial number portion of your VIN should be 800001+ to be an '84 model.
exactly.
Old 08-25-10, 07:51 PM
  #6  
nother rican witha rotary

 
thafox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: S.Otown
Posts: 1,034
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question

Originally Posted by bwaits_
I do not believe that is late enough to be big spline axles but you will not know for sure until you measure something.

Some older post I made and found through the search function.
so according to this, if i were to have a small axle housing laying around i couldnt use it to make a big axle one if i had spare axles lying around?
Old 08-25-10, 08:32 PM
  #7  
its supposed to do that

 
flight_of_pain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: PNW
Posts: 1,352
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
There is no bearing solution to use big axles in a small axle housing. For what its worth the whole mid year 83 size change is BS, all 83s had the large driveshaft flange and small axles. Where the confusion stems from is some of the 84 cars were made in late 83, but were sold as 84s. Mr john doe rx7 owner says "my car has an 83 build date but big axles...OMG ONOES!" without thinking for a second and realizing his car is an 84.


Isaac
Old 08-25-10, 10:28 PM
  #8  
Moderator

iTrader: (3)
 
j9fd3s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Posts: 30,780
Received 2,565 Likes on 1,824 Posts
Originally Posted by flight_of_pain
There is no bearing solution to use big axles in a small axle housing. For what its worth the whole mid year 83 size change is BS, all 83s had the large driveshaft flange and small axles. Where the confusion stems from is some of the 84 cars were made in late 83, but were sold as 84s. Mr john doe rx7 owner says "my car has an 83 build date but big axles...OMG ONOES!" without thinking for a second and realizing his car is an 84.


Isaac
either that or they look at the big driveshaft flange...
Old 02-21-11, 11:31 AM
  #9  
1 of 203 94 White PEP's

iTrader: (1)
 
PureMdMa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Suwanee, GA
Posts: 1,844
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Brining this back up sorry, so If I wanna get a rear end out of a 83 with LSD and put it in my small bearing car do I need to change the driveshaft flange or is that even possible? Im looking to put it in a RX2.
Old 02-21-11, 12:38 PM
  #10  
Old [Sch|F]ool

 
peejay's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Posts: 12,503
Received 411 Likes on 294 Posts
Originally Posted by patmac6075
I have a quick question concerning the date at which Mazda switched from small axle to large axle? My car ('83 GS) shows a production date (on the drivers door) of 9/83. Would this be considered a "later" model '83? If so, can I be positive that I have large axles?
That's weird, new model year production generally started in August.

I could have sworn that my '84 has an 8/83 build date.
Old 02-21-11, 12:44 PM
  #11  
o.O

iTrader: (3)
 
Crispin38's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: 64865
Posts: 871
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I have small axles, (83 LSD Disc rear end in my 85 car) and have had no problem with it at all whatsoever.
BUT, instead of swapping gears, I put a 87-88 NT trans in, (much higher ratios)
If you want lower gears, swap gears.
As far as LSD, I've never actually driven a car without a LSD, so, I can't say it works wonders but just from purely understanding what it does, I'd say it's a must.
Old 02-21-11, 04:02 PM
  #12  
its supposed to do that

 
flight_of_pain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: PNW
Posts: 1,352
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by PureMdMa
Brining this back up sorry, so If I wanna get a rear end out of a 83 with LSD and put it in my small bearing car do I need to change the driveshaft flange or is that even possible? Im looking to put it in a RX2.

In an rx7 you would just use the 83-85 driveshaft, but I do not know if the length is the same for an rx2. If you remove the flange you will need to replace the crush tube, and re-set lash.


Isaac
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jeff20B
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
73
09-16-18 07:16 PM



Quick Reply: Large Axle Small Axle



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:18 AM.