1st Generation Specific (1979-1985) 1979-1985 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections

Large Axle Small Axle

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 26, 2010 | 12:42 PM
  #1  
patmac6075's Avatar
Thread Starter
Once a Marine.....
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 722
Likes: 2
From: MKE WI
Large Axle Small Axle

I have a quick question concerning the date at which Mazda switched from small axle to large axle? My car ('83 GS) shows a production date (on the drivers door) of 9/83. Would this be considered a "later" model '83? If so, can I be positive that I have large axles?
Obviously it has drum brakes, but lately I've been considering just swapping the pumpkin and either getting a higher gear ratio or LSD (or both...KIA?).
Any recommendation....I'm not convinced that I need to swap-out the entire rear end...my opinion is the drums are sufficient for my needs, but I DO want the LSD. I'm still in the "thinking it over" stage, so I'm open to suggestion.
Thanks
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2010 | 02:14 PM
  #2  
bwaits's Avatar
Needs More Noise
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,375
Likes: 1
From: Georgia
I do not believe that is late enough to be big spline axles but you will not know for sure until you measure something.

Some older post I made and found through the search function.

Originally Posted by Re-Speed.com
If you do pull an axle, 1979-1983 splines will measure under 1" diameter and 84-85 splines will measure over 1" diameter.

-billy
Originally Posted by Re-Speed.com
You could measure the od of the axles housing where the bearing sits. It will be 3.2~"

OD if the big bearing axle housing just behind the flange will be approximately 3.2" in diameter.

Also, IIRC, if your rear end/drive shaft flange is tapped it is big axle, if it is through bolted with nuts it will be a small axle.

-billy
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2010 | 02:32 PM
  #3  
DenCon's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
From: Central Washington
My 7/83 has small axles.
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2010 | 02:58 PM
  #4  
gsl-se addict's Avatar
Super Moderator
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,088
Likes: 11
From: Lynchburg, VA
'83 models use the 84/85 driveshaft, but use the small axles.

'84-'85 models use the large axles

Parts fiche does not list a mid-year VIN split for the change, so you will only have large axles if you have an '84 model.

'84 models started being built in 9/83. The serial number portion of your VIN should be 800001+ to be an '84 model.
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2010 | 06:42 PM
  #5  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Moderator
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,833
Likes: 3,232
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Originally Posted by gsl-se addict
'83 models use the 84/85 driveshaft, but use the small axles.

'84-'85 models use the large axles

Parts fiche does not list a mid-year VIN split for the change, so you will only have large axles if you have an '84 model.

'84 models started being built in 9/83. The serial number portion of your VIN should be 800001+ to be an '84 model.
exactly.
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2010 | 07:51 PM
  #6  
thafox's Avatar
nother rican witha rotary
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,034
Likes: 0
From: S.Otown
Question

Originally Posted by bwaits_
I do not believe that is late enough to be big spline axles but you will not know for sure until you measure something.

Some older post I made and found through the search function.
so according to this, if i were to have a small axle housing laying around i couldnt use it to make a big axle one if i had spare axles lying around?
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2010 | 08:32 PM
  #7  
flight_of_pain's Avatar
its supposed to do that
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,352
Likes: 2
From: PNW
There is no bearing solution to use big axles in a small axle housing. For what its worth the whole mid year 83 size change is BS, all 83s had the large driveshaft flange and small axles. Where the confusion stems from is some of the 84 cars were made in late 83, but were sold as 84s. Mr john doe rx7 owner says "my car has an 83 build date but big axles...OMG ONOES!" without thinking for a second and realizing his car is an 84.


Isaac
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2010 | 10:28 PM
  #8  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Moderator
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,833
Likes: 3,232
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Originally Posted by flight_of_pain
There is no bearing solution to use big axles in a small axle housing. For what its worth the whole mid year 83 size change is BS, all 83s had the large driveshaft flange and small axles. Where the confusion stems from is some of the 84 cars were made in late 83, but were sold as 84s. Mr john doe rx7 owner says "my car has an 83 build date but big axles...OMG ONOES!" without thinking for a second and realizing his car is an 84.


Isaac
either that or they look at the big driveshaft flange...
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2011 | 11:31 AM
  #9  
PureMdMa's Avatar
1 of 203 94 White PEP's
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,844
Likes: 0
From: Suwanee, GA
Brining this back up sorry, so If I wanna get a rear end out of a 83 with LSD and put it in my small bearing car do I need to change the driveshaft flange or is that even possible? Im looking to put it in a RX2.
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2011 | 12:38 PM
  #10  
peejay's Avatar
Old [Sch|F]ool
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 12,862
Likes: 568
From: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Originally Posted by patmac6075
I have a quick question concerning the date at which Mazda switched from small axle to large axle? My car ('83 GS) shows a production date (on the drivers door) of 9/83. Would this be considered a "later" model '83? If so, can I be positive that I have large axles?
That's weird, new model year production generally started in August.

I could have sworn that my '84 has an 8/83 build date.
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2011 | 12:44 PM
  #11  
Crispin38's Avatar
o.O
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 871
Likes: 2
From: 64865
I have small axles, (83 LSD Disc rear end in my 85 car) and have had no problem with it at all whatsoever.
BUT, instead of swapping gears, I put a 87-88 NT trans in, (much higher ratios)
If you want lower gears, swap gears.
As far as LSD, I've never actually driven a car without a LSD, so, I can't say it works wonders but just from purely understanding what it does, I'd say it's a must.
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2011 | 04:02 PM
  #12  
flight_of_pain's Avatar
its supposed to do that
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,352
Likes: 2
From: PNW
Originally Posted by PureMdMa
Brining this back up sorry, so If I wanna get a rear end out of a 83 with LSD and put it in my small bearing car do I need to change the driveshaft flange or is that even possible? Im looking to put it in a RX2.

In an rx7 you would just use the 83-85 driveshaft, but I do not know if the length is the same for an rx2. If you remove the flange you will need to replace the crush tube, and re-set lash.


Isaac
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jeff20B
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
73
Sep 16, 2018 07:16 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:19 AM.