1st Generation Specific (1979-1985) 1979-1985 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections

how can it be?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 8, 2003 | 04:19 PM
  #1  
snakes99's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
From: plymouth, wisconsin
Question how can it be?

ok, are 2nd gens slow as hell or what? i drove one today just test driving it to have a little fun, but it seemed slow as hell. it didnt have half the pep my 85 gs has. and it didnt take off the line or anything, i thought all 13b rx-7s were pretty fast. oh yeah the 2nd gen was a gxl i believe, i dont know what that all means, but its just wierd to me how slow they seem.
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2003 | 04:55 PM
  #2  
White84SE's Avatar
U sUx0rz @ THe IntaRwEB!
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 327
Likes: 0
From: Claysburg, PA, USA
Well, look at it this way... the GXL was the top of the line deluxe model, had every option you could think of, and some you can't. That stuff adds weight. Granted, they power on the 13B was pumped up to 146, I believe for the '86-'88 cars, but they still weighed in the low-mid 3000 pound range... now, take into account that many of the second gens out there were bought as cars, not RX7's.. the care taken on those cars seems to be lesser than what you find with a first gen. And even new, the NA second gens were all THAT much faster than a strong 12A car...

--Danny
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2003 | 04:57 PM
  #3  
Aico's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 532
Likes: 0
From: The Netherlands/Dordrecht
Only the Turbo models are fast.
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2003 | 05:01 PM
  #4  
O 16581 72452 5's Avatar
The infamous number guy!
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,953
Likes: 0
From: Terre Haute, IN.
Low-mid 3,000lb range? They were around 2,700lbs depending on options of course.
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2003 | 01:25 AM
  #5  
snakes99's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
From: plymouth, wisconsin
all i know is that i was not impressed at all with the performance of this rx-7 and the suspension was totally ****, it was all loose and the back end sunk like a mother with you started off the line. that may be cuz im used to my tokico and eibach suspension, but none the less it just sucked over all.
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2003 | 03:39 AM
  #6  
White84SE's Avatar
U sUx0rz @ THe IntaRwEB!
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 327
Likes: 0
From: Claysburg, PA, USA
Originally posted by O 16581 72452 5
Low-mid 3,000lb range? They were around 2,700lbs depending on options of course.
You might want to check your stats... the curb weight is listed between 2800-2900 for a GXL.. throw a tank of gas in there and a driver, and you're easily into the ton and a half range...

--Danny
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2003 | 03:48 AM
  #7  
O 16581 72452 5's Avatar
The infamous number guy!
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,953
Likes: 0
From: Terre Haute, IN.
The curb weight on my FB is 2,800.
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2003 | 03:51 AM
  #8  
ioTus's Avatar
'84 5-letter
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 3,219
Likes: 8
From: Washington State
jesus christ.

my gsl-se with a stereo is about 2500
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2003 | 04:15 AM
  #9  
O 16581 72452 5's Avatar
The infamous number guy!
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,953
Likes: 0
From: Terre Haute, IN.
We're talking about curb weight, look at the sticker inside your driver's side door.
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2003 | 01:10 PM
  #10  
White84SE's Avatar
U sUx0rz @ THe IntaRwEB!
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 327
Likes: 0
From: Claysburg, PA, USA
That's gross vehicle weight... as in, how much the car will weigh when loaded with as much stuff as Mazda feels safe in allowing you. That is not curb weight.

--Danny
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2003 | 04:22 PM
  #11  
pratch's Avatar
Mazspeed.com
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,172
Likes: 0
From: Maryland
The heaviest FC is ~3300 I think and its a vert.
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2003 | 05:29 PM
  #12  
O 16581 72452 5's Avatar
The infamous number guy!
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,953
Likes: 0
From: Terre Haute, IN.
Originally posted by White84SE
That's gross vehicle weight... as in, how much the car will weigh when loaded with as much stuff as Mazda feels safe in allowing you. That is not curb weight.

--Danny
Oh, i thought curb weight a synonym to gross weight.
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2003 | 07:14 PM
  #13  
RotorMotorDriver's Avatar
Seven Is Coming
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,503
Likes: 4
From: Washington
Originally posted by Aico
Only the Turbo models are fast.
Define "fast"...

My 83 by the numbers (HP to weight ratio) shouldve kept up with a T2.

The only 2nd gen I would own would be a T2, only because the N/As are just a little too slow for my tastes with the extra weight .

~T.J.

PS - If you think the GXL was slow, try driving a N/A 'vert .
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:23 AM.