1st Generation Specific (1979-1985) 1979-1985 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections

FC drivetrain into FB

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 10, 2004 | 02:38 AM
  #1  
flamin-roids's Avatar
Thread Starter
Lets rock.
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,355
Likes: 0
From: SLC, Utah
FC drivetrain into FB

I miss my FB terribly. IT was a '81 GSL that had carb problems so I got rid of it.I now have a '89 GXL. More power and nicer. But still lacks the feel of my FB. Now I could easily get a working FC drivetrain. And get a decent FB for cheap. So here's what I was thinking of doing. Picking up a light base model with blown motor. pulling the 12A and dropping a 13B out of a S4. Running it alongside a GSL-SE tranny along with a GSL-SE rear end. Now my question is this. I know how to get the motor bolted in. I plan on running premix and just a header and intake for mods. Reason I'm not going GSL-SE is that they are heavier. Is it difficult to run the wiring harness and all the electronic bullshit that comes with a 13B? Or is it possible to strip the motor down to the basics (No OMP or emissions) and just worry about EGI and ignition?
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2004 | 03:10 AM
  #2  
rotary emotions's Avatar
HEAVY METAL THUNDER
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,864
Likes: 0
From: Elsenborn, Belgian Eifel
If you are using the engine only, it shouldn't be very hard. The electrics aren't easy, but it's been done a few times, so it can't be that hard. You can always use the engine with a megasquirt unit for fuel and a dizzy for ignition. EU non-turbo models (S4) used a dizzy, with the same coils we know from our first gens, so it's possible.
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2004 | 12:42 PM
  #3  
steve84GS TII's Avatar
FB+FC=F-ME
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 3,353
Likes: 5
From: Rohnert Park CA
Piece-O-cake,especially if smog isnt an issue.90% of the stock EGI wiring is contained in the right side harness.That harness is plug and play between the engine and ECU.The left side harness requires about 10 wires be run to power the ECU,coils,CAS and fuel pump.Not hard at all, with a factory manual.
If your going S4,might as well keep the OMP, since its manual not electric.S5 OMP and ECU requires a lot more work to convert into an FB(Ive done both)

The tough part of an FC conversion is fuel delivery.The return line needs to be enlarged with another stock feedline,the fuel pump needs to be an intank EFI or external EFI pump,and the tank must have a slosh/baffle box around the intank pickup/pump.Or run a fuel cell....
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2004 | 12:50 PM
  #4  
Rex4Life's Avatar
RX-7 Alumni
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,140
Likes: 1
From: Spacecenter Houston
Originally Posted by steve84GS TII
Piece-O-cake,especially if smog isnt an issue.90% of the stock EGI wiring is contained in the right side harness.That harness is plug and play between the engine and ECU.The left side harness requires about 10 wires be run to power the ECU,coils,CAS and fuel pump.Not hard at all, with a factory manual.
If your going S4,might as well keep the OMP, since its manual not electric.S5 OMP and ECU requires a lot more work to convert into an FB(Ive done both)

The tough part of an FC conversion is fuel delivery.The return line needs to be enlarged with another stock feedline,the fuel pump needs to be an intank EFI or external EFI pump,and the tank must have a slosh/baffle box around the intank pickup/pump.Or run a fuel cell....
Yep, and if you do all that, you may as well just make it an S4 Turbo!! All the same work but much more power and upgrade capability.
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2004 | 12:55 PM
  #5  
steve84GS TII's Avatar
FB+FC=F-ME
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 3,353
Likes: 5
From: Rohnert Park CA
True,it is just about the same work as doing a TII conversion.But now, after going through all the turbo teething issues for the last few years,I can see how a more reliable, revvy N/A conversion would be desirable.Especially a S5 setup.....

Last edited by steve84GS TII; Oct 10, 2004 at 12:57 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2004 | 01:12 PM
  #6  
84stock's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 5,547
Likes: 12
From: calgary
Just go with an SE, no conversions,less headache, no parts to look for and it's bullit proof. A little heavier, just ditch the electric windows, air conditioning, power steering and swap the leather for a pair of cloth buckets, pull all the sound deadening material out from under the carpet and you're there. A lot less work than looking for SE engine and supension parts for the conversion. Just bridgeport some 12a irons, get a weber side draft and you're fly'in.
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2004 | 08:05 PM
  #7  
therotaryrocket's Avatar
PIMP
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,012
Likes: 0
From: Greensboro, NC
i wanna do the same swap, could I use the SE gas tank and pump? What about the tank from the 86', would that fit?
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2004 | 12:12 AM
  #8  
rotary emotions's Avatar
HEAVY METAL THUNDER
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,864
Likes: 0
From: Elsenborn, Belgian Eifel
Originally Posted by therotaryrocket
i wanna do the same swap, could I use the SE gas tank and pump? What about the tank from the 86', would that fit?

86 up: no it won't fit at all. shaped differently due to IRS and spare wheel location.

GSL-SE: yes if you start with a 84-85 12A chassis, no if you have a 79-83 one.
You can use a 84-85 tank in a earlier car, but the spare wheel well needs to be modified. The spares on S3 cars (84-85) are the "limp home" types, to make space for the larger gastank.
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2004 | 10:26 AM
  #9  
two79rx7's's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 244
Likes: 1
From: baltimore maryland
steve84 gs tll how can I get in touch with you.
I have a few first gen 7's and i have one 90 S5 13b to put into one of them. the engine is stock with 90K miles on it. It came with harness... I also got a 351N ecu finally for a good price. I plan to put in RB full exhaust.
I could sure use some experience and insite from some one who has done this before and can recommend options for setup.

regards two79rx7's
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2004 | 08:32 PM
  #10  
pjr's Avatar
pjr
Mr May 2011
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,607
Likes: 2
From: Northville, MI
Originally Posted by flamin-roids
I miss my FB terribly. IT was a '81 GSL that had carb problems so I got rid of it.I now have a '89 GXL. More power and nicer. But still lacks the feel of my FB. ...
Just curious --- when you say that you "miss the feel of your FB" what do you mean?
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2004 | 08:40 PM
  #11  
pjr's Avatar
pjr
Mr May 2011
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,607
Likes: 2
From: Northville, MI
Originally Posted by 84stock
Just go with an SE, no conversions,less headache, no parts to look for and it's bullit proof. A little heavier, just ditch the electric windows, air conditioning, power steering and swap the leather for a pair of cloth buckets, pull all the sound deadening material out from under the carpet and you're there. A lot less work than looking for SE engine and supension parts for the conversion. Just bridgeport some 12a irons, get a weber side draft and you're fly'in.
Hey 84stock, I'm lucky... my SE was one of the last ones made. It came with cloth buckets and no power steering (along with painted mirors) -- strange combo!

Anyhow, are you saying just add Webers and a turbo to the stock 13B and go? It seems that nobody bolts on a turbo to a RX-7. Most often it's a conversion project. I wonder how difficult the "bolt on" would be.
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2004 | 12:14 AM
  #12  
steve84GS TII's Avatar
FB+FC=F-ME
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 3,353
Likes: 5
From: Rohnert Park CA
Just PM me.The S5 conversion was actually easier than the S4 because much of the wiring is simplfied on the S5 and there are less external sensors.

The trick is the front cover.To retain the stock ECU and OMP,the SE front cover has to be built up, then machined down and drilled/tapped to accept the larger electric S5 OMP.Other than that,theres no major hurdles with a S5 swap into a 1st gen.Just wiring and fuel delivery which is basically the same for a S4 or S5 swap......
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2004 | 12:24 AM
  #13  
flamin-roids's Avatar
Thread Starter
Lets rock.
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,355
Likes: 0
From: SLC, Utah
What I mean by feel is the cars ability to react when I want it too. FC's handle better but lack that "feel". Reason why I said S4 is because I already have a perfectly good S4 motor already with harness and all. Second I like the look of the FB better than the FC. A '86 SE is still heavier and in my opinion uglier. I want a S4 N/A motor bolted to a GSL-SE tranny in a '81-83 GSL. I'm looking to have a 2000lb car with a modest 150hp. I want the motor to be emmision free with no air pump,power steering, and A.C. I understand the GSL-SE was significantly heavier than the previous FB's. (2200lbs vs. 2450lbs?) Also I would like the whole project to be somewhat cost effective.
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2004 | 05:38 AM
  #14  
rotary emotions's Avatar
HEAVY METAL THUNDER
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,864
Likes: 0
From: Elsenborn, Belgian Eifel
if you use a S4 NA you can use the FC tranny aswell: direct fit. (just need to use the FB mounts, but they bolt on to the box)
it should be a rather straightforward install, only requiring a modified or custom engine brace, and a 12A or GLS-SE front cover. The wiring will be the most work. If you could use the ECU from a EU-spec S4, you can actually use the stock coils and dizzy. That'd be less wiring to do.
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2004 | 05:44 AM
  #15  
Gregs's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,980
Likes: 0
From: KING COUNTY, WA
Originally Posted by rotary emotions
If you are using the engine only, it shouldn't be very hard. The electrics aren't easy, but it's been done a few times, so it can't be that hard. You can always use the engine with a megasquirt unit for fuel and a dizzy for ignition. EU non-turbo models (S4) used a dizzy, with the same coils we know from our first gens, so it's possible.
series 4 cars DO NOT use distributors nor the same coils as fb's
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2004 | 06:54 AM
  #16  
rotary emotions's Avatar
HEAVY METAL THUNDER
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,864
Likes: 0
From: Elsenborn, Belgian Eifel
Originally Posted by Gregs
series 4 cars DO NOT use distributors nor the same coils as fb's

don't want to sound unfriendly, but could you PLEASE read my post again?
I said he could use a S4 ECU from a EUROPEAN FC. Those are fuel only and DO use the same distributor and coils as a FB. It would simplify installations greatly.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2004 | 04:09 PM
  #17  
cpt_gloval's Avatar
KARATE EXPLOSION
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,991
Likes: 34
From: Deadmonds, WA
hmm. i wonder how difficult it would be to acquire an EU ECU... got one laying around, rotary emotions?
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2004 | 03:22 AM
  #18  
flamin-roids's Avatar
Thread Starter
Lets rock.
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,355
Likes: 0
From: SLC, Utah
Well ****. I guess I'll bag the N/A idea. I was planning on putting a street ported S5 TII motor with a standalone system in my FC. Should I drop the turbo setup into the FC and put my S5 N/A setup into a FB? Or go turbo FB?
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2004 | 12:53 PM
  #19  
rotary emotions's Avatar
HEAVY METAL THUNDER
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,864
Likes: 0
From: Elsenborn, Belgian Eifel
Originally Posted by cpt_gloval
hmm. i wonder how difficult it would be to acquire an EU ECU... got one laying around, rotary emotions?
Yes.
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2004 | 12:56 PM
  #20  
rotary emotions's Avatar
HEAVY METAL THUNDER
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,864
Likes: 0
From: Elsenborn, Belgian Eifel
Originally Posted by flamin-roids
Well ****. I guess I'll bag the N/A idea. I was planning on putting a street ported S5 TII motor with a standalone system in my FC. Should I drop the turbo setup into the FC and put my S5 N/A setup into a FB? Or go turbo FB?

depends. A turbo FB will be faster than a turbo FC (less wheight). A 13B NA FB will be faster than a 12A NA.
I went trubo FB and can't even get the damn thing to run: no ignition! (using Wolf 3D) Well, I have one spark firing, but it's only one trailing
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2004 | 12:34 AM
  #21  
jes's Avatar
jes
Rotorhead
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 57
Likes: 3
From: California
Exclamation

Originally Posted by steve84GS TII
The trick is the front cover.To retain the stock ECU and OMP,the SE front cover has to be built up, then machined down and drilled/tapped to accept the larger electric S5 OMP.Other than that,theres no major hurdles with a S5 swap into a 1st gen.Just wiring and fuel delivery which is basically the same for a S4 or S5 swap......
Did you get someone to do this successfully? I talked to a couple machine shops. One didn't want to mess with a used part with an oil residue. The other wanted to make an adaptor plate. $300+6wks! I didn't think it would clear the water pump inlet. I ended up going with the SE OMP. I'm currently suplementing oil with pre-mix until I make a cable to operate the OMP...
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Wicked93gs
Other Engine Conversions - non V-8
44
Jan 12, 2022 10:08 AM
Wicked93gs
Other Engine Conversions - non V-8
0
Aug 23, 2015 10:14 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:51 AM.