Dyno tuned today =) 13B
#1
Rotary Enthusiast
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: The World
Posts: 1,100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Dyno tuned today =) 13B
The long awaited day! :-) All went well until I finished the tune and found a few problems when I was trying to leave...
- Main fusible link loose - so intermittent operation of stuff heh
- TPS plug fell off - how stupid
Engine details:
- 13B 6-port
- No aux port actuator sleeves
- Only running secondary injectors (thats the 2 on the intake)
- MicroTech Digi Series 1 Pro ECU
- TB Mod
So here are the graphs:
HP and lbs-feet
130.1hp@6689 / 236.8lb-ft@5662
KW and Nm
97.0kw@6689 / 321.1Nm@5662
- Main fusible link loose - so intermittent operation of stuff heh
- TPS plug fell off - how stupid
Engine details:
- 13B 6-port
- No aux port actuator sleeves
- Only running secondary injectors (thats the 2 on the intake)
- MicroTech Digi Series 1 Pro ECU
- TB Mod
So here are the graphs:
HP and lbs-feet
130.1hp@6689 / 236.8lb-ft@5662
KW and Nm
97.0kw@6689 / 321.1Nm@5662
#3
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
Originally Posted by mcnannay
not bad...but i gotta ask, why only two injectors??????????
does that actually improve performance?
does that actually improve performance?
nice dyno #'s for n/a!
#4
Rotary Enthusiast
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: The World
Posts: 1,100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by mcnannay
not bad...but i gotta ask, why only two injectors??????????
does that actually improve performance?
does that actually improve performance?
#6
Rotary Enthusiast
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: The World
Posts: 1,100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Max7
Strange having more TQ then HP on a rotary
Trending Topics
#14
The mystery of the prize.
um, the torque scale on the graphs is not right.
200 lbs-ft @ 4000 RPM is 152HP, the dyno graph does not reflect this, not using the right scale for the torque curve.
You have 70 HP @ 4000 RPM, this turns into 91 lbs-ft @ 4000 RPM, not 200 lbs-ft.
It looks like the torque curve is also plotted on the HP scale, because the torque curve @ 4000RPM looks like it's right at 91 on the HP scale, which is correct for the lbs-ft value with 70HP at that rpm.
Sorry, you're not making > 200lbs-ft on your NA 6 port, bummer.
200 lbs-ft @ 4000 RPM is 152HP, the dyno graph does not reflect this, not using the right scale for the torque curve.
You have 70 HP @ 4000 RPM, this turns into 91 lbs-ft @ 4000 RPM, not 200 lbs-ft.
It looks like the torque curve is also plotted on the HP scale, because the torque curve @ 4000RPM looks like it's right at 91 on the HP scale, which is correct for the lbs-ft value with 70HP at that rpm.
Sorry, you're not making > 200lbs-ft on your NA 6 port, bummer.
#15
Rotary Enthusiast
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: The World
Posts: 1,100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Injectors are 550cc. Why im using the secondary location? Thats the way it came! heh. Wish there was some documentation on the way things were when I bought it.
Only reason one set is running is because we don't know how the primaries have been wired up, and the ECU had staging disabled.
And pengarufoo - the graphs are right.
HP = (Torque * RPM) / 5252
So lets look at 4000rpm.
HP = (91 * 4000) / 5252
which equals 69.3HP, which is dead on with the graph.
How torque and hp relate: http://vettenet.org/torquehp.html
Only reason one set is running is because we don't know how the primaries have been wired up, and the ECU had staging disabled.
And pengarufoo - the graphs are right.
HP = (Torque * RPM) / 5252
So lets look at 4000rpm.
HP = (91 * 4000) / 5252
which equals 69.3HP, which is dead on with the graph.
How torque and hp relate: http://vettenet.org/torquehp.html
#16
FD > FB > FC
on a 20B or something id belive it, but there is just NO WAY IN HELL yoou could me making over 200ft/lbs of torque on a STOCK port N/A!!
Im not calling you a liar, they dyno just has to be wrong... rotaries just dont make torque from doing a throttle body mod and adding an EMS
By all means if Im wrong, would someone explain to me exactly how this is possible?? I mean... it just doesnt add up!
Just for arguements sake, would you ever consider taking it to a different dyno place?
Im not calling you a liar, they dyno just has to be wrong... rotaries just dont make torque from doing a throttle body mod and adding an EMS
By all means if Im wrong, would someone explain to me exactly how this is possible?? I mean... it just doesnt add up!
Just for arguements sake, would you ever consider taking it to a different dyno place?
#17
Rotary Enthusiast
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: The World
Posts: 1,100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I take back my last post ;-) I misread something...
HP = (Torque * RPM) / 5252
Something certainly isn't right...
sooo 4000 rpm, and ill go with the HP reading on the dyno because it's most realistic.
70 = (T * 4000) / 5252
( 70 * 5252 ) / 4000 = Torque (91)
So I would have to agree with you then that the torque curve has been plotted on the hp scale.... and I'll be calling them up tomorrow and asking about this heh..
I don't particularly care about what it makes, but it's nice to have a tuned car at last
So. Max hp was 130.1.
130.1 = (T * 6689) / 5252
(130.1 * 5252) / 6689 = Torque (102.15 lb-ft)
So max torque was 102.15 lb-ft @ 6689 rpm
HP = (Torque * RPM) / 5252
Something certainly isn't right...
sooo 4000 rpm, and ill go with the HP reading on the dyno because it's most realistic.
70 = (T * 4000) / 5252
( 70 * 5252 ) / 4000 = Torque (91)
So I would have to agree with you then that the torque curve has been plotted on the hp scale.... and I'll be calling them up tomorrow and asking about this heh..
I don't particularly care about what it makes, but it's nice to have a tuned car at last
So. Max hp was 130.1.
130.1 = (T * 6689) / 5252
(130.1 * 5252) / 6689 = Torque (102.15 lb-ft)
So max torque was 102.15 lb-ft @ 6689 rpm
#18
still love the FC
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Dayton, Ohio
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Max7
Strange having more TQ then HP on a rotary
The way the graph is setup, both the correct HP and Torque should be read from the left axis.
#21
Rotary Enthusiast
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: The World
Posts: 1,100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It's quite wonderful to finally have a smooth response to the accelerator. Becoming more of a pleasure to driver over time as I iron all the bugs out.
Another modification I did today was to run a huge ground from the battery to the block, and an additional wire from the alternator to the positive on the battery. Huge difference with electrical load, nothing is affected
Another modification I did today was to run a huge ground from the battery to the block, and an additional wire from the alternator to the positive on the battery. Huge difference with electrical load, nothing is affected
#22
Rotary Enthusiast
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: The World
Posts: 1,100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hold on I screwed up the calculations on the lb-ft one, thats the torque that I get at the maximum hp RPM... need to recalculate based on the max torque rpm figure there for the actual reading.... Why couldn't it just have worked hehe ;-)
Not exactly sure on calculating this one, its late.
Not exactly sure on calculating this one, its late.
#24
sold the FD...kept the FB
You need to get the other two injectors hooked up. Only having two 550cc injectors and running them at 80% duty cycle will only get you a max of 126 flywheel hp (on paper).
check for yourself:
http://rx7.com/cgi-local/2ndgencalc.cgi
check for yourself:
http://rx7.com/cgi-local/2ndgencalc.cgi