1st Generation Specific (1979-1985) 1979-1985 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections

dyno sheet

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 14, 2006 | 08:06 PM
  #26  
Kentetsu's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 11,359
Likes: 14
From: Grand Rapids Michigan
The filter may flow better, but I doubt the entire assembly does... It still has a dinky hat and is sucking through about a 4" opening. And how the hell did we end up having this discussion in this thread?
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2006 | 08:53 PM
  #27  
Mazda12AGS's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 413
Likes: 0
From: Columbiana, AL
Originally Posted by rotor vs. piston
I think so. Granted we don't have the same gears, but close, in third I'd top out around 100mph at 7200rpm with my 4.09 -SE rear. But then too, I have 225-50-16's on the rear which helps.
Mine is lucky if you hit 85 in 3rd at 8000 RPMs. I have a stock trans and Driveline.
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2006 | 10:03 PM
  #28  
Jozay721's Avatar
'Nothing like a rotary'
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 464
Likes: 0
From: worcester, mass
Originally Posted by Kentetsu
The filter may flow better, but I doubt the entire assembly does... It still has a dinky hat and is sucking through about a 4" opening. And how the hell did we end up having this discussion in this thread?
so is the RB intake better?cuz i was thinking about buying it cuz it was only 50 bucks, idk this guy was talking about how he switched intakes and found out which one flowed better.and i got interested,but its all good.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Rotate86
Single Turbo RX-7's
5
May 18, 2018 02:44 PM
eddierotary
Engine Management Forum
16
Oct 4, 2016 08:22 PM
HalifaxFD
Canadian Forum
126
May 9, 2016 07:06 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:32 PM.