1st Generation Specific (1979-1985) 1979-1985 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections

dyno sheet

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-14-06, 08:06 PM
  #26  
Lives on the Forum

 
Kentetsu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Grand Rapids Michigan
Posts: 11,359
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts
The filter may flow better, but I doubt the entire assembly does... It still has a dinky hat and is sucking through about a 4" opening. And how the hell did we end up having this discussion in this thread?
Old 08-14-06, 08:53 PM
  #27  
Senior Member

 
Mazda12AGS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Columbiana, AL
Posts: 413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by rotor vs. piston
I think so. Granted we don't have the same gears, but close, in third I'd top out around 100mph at 7200rpm with my 4.09 -SE rear. But then too, I have 225-50-16's on the rear which helps.
Mine is lucky if you hit 85 in 3rd at 8000 RPMs. I have a stock trans and Driveline.
Old 08-14-06, 10:03 PM
  #28  
'Nothing like a rotary'

 
Jozay721's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: worcester, mass
Posts: 464
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Kentetsu
The filter may flow better, but I doubt the entire assembly does... It still has a dinky hat and is sucking through about a 4" opening. And how the hell did we end up having this discussion in this thread?
so is the RB intake better?cuz i was thinking about buying it cuz it was only 50 bucks, idk this guy was talking about how he switched intakes and found out which one flowed better.and i got interested,but its all good.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Rotate86
Single Turbo RX-7's
5
05-18-18 02:44 PM
eddierotary
Engine Management Forum
16
10-04-16 08:22 PM
HalifaxFD
Canadian Forum
126
05-09-16 07:06 PM



Quick Reply: dyno sheet



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:52 PM.