Dyno graph if ya want to see.
Dyno graph if ya want to see.
http://www.picturetrail.com/gallery/...6574&members=1
Lets not get all into the damn debate again, I just said earlier I would post the graph.
Lets not get all into the damn debate again, I just said earlier I would post the graph.
Originally posted by Logo
Don't take this the wrong way because it is NOT a flame but why did you go that route? 220rwhp doesn't seem like a gain worthy of all the added weight to the front of the car.
Don't take this the wrong way because it is NOT a flame but why did you go that route? 220rwhp doesn't seem like a gain worthy of all the added weight to the front of the car.
It was cheap ($$), has good performance, was simple to do, and he now has plenty of power and torque. He used many aluminum components, so the weight gain is minimal.
Not my style, but still effective, and it is still a 1st gen.
Originally posted by Directfreak
Don't get everyone started. please do a search on under his name and see for yourself. It's been discussed before, over and over and over.
It was cheap ($$), has good performance, was simple to do, and he now has plenty of power and torque. He used many aluminum components, so the weight gain is minimal.
Not my style, but still effective, and it is still a 1st gen.
Don't get everyone started. please do a search on under his name and see for yourself. It's been discussed before, over and over and over.
It was cheap ($$), has good performance, was simple to do, and he now has plenty of power and torque. He used many aluminum components, so the weight gain is minimal.
Not my style, but still effective, and it is still a 1st gen.
Trending Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
eddierotary
Engine Management Forum
16
Oct 4, 2016 08:22 PM
HalifaxFD
Canadian Forum
126
May 9, 2016 07:06 PM



the car should feel like it would be a blast to drive.

