1st Generation Specific (1979-1985) 1979-1985 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections

Dyno graph if ya want to see.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 23, 2002 | 07:45 PM
  #1  
Winnipeg85GSL's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 553
Likes: 0
From: Winnipeg,Manitoba
Dyno graph if ya want to see.

http://www.picturetrail.com/gallery/...6574&members=1

Lets not get all into the damn debate again, I just said earlier I would post the graph.
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2002 | 08:05 PM
  #2  
Logo's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
From: Georgia
What is the dyno of? The pictures are so small I can barely make out the numbers. Looks like around 200rwhp but I could be wrong.
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2002 | 08:53 PM
  #3  
Winnipeg85GSL's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 553
Likes: 0
From: Winnipeg,Manitoba
V8 RX-7

bout 220 rwhp.
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2002 | 07:48 AM
  #4  
Logo's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
From: Georgia
Don't take this the wrong way because it is NOT a flame but why did you go that route? 220rwhp doesn't seem like a gain worthy of all the added weight to the front of the car.
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2002 | 10:29 AM
  #5  
Directfreak's Avatar
I am a Jeeper Now.
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 9,371
Likes: 4
From: 3OH5
Originally posted by Logo
Don't take this the wrong way because it is NOT a flame but why did you go that route? 220rwhp doesn't seem like a gain worthy of all the added weight to the front of the car.
Don't get everyone started. please do a search on under his name and see for yourself. It's been discussed before, over and over and over.

It was cheap ($$), has good performance, was simple to do, and he now has plenty of power and torque. He used many aluminum components, so the weight gain is minimal.

Not my style, but still effective, and it is still a 1st gen.
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2002 | 10:37 AM
  #6  
RacerX7fb's Avatar
paradox
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,296
Likes: 2
From: SoCal
That's a really good power "curve" if I can call it that...all of the power early on and flat throughout the band..almost like an SE the car should feel like it would be a blast to drive.
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2002 | 10:53 AM
  #7  
Winnipeg85GSL's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 553
Likes: 0
From: Winnipeg,Manitoba
Originally posted by Directfreak


Don't get everyone started. please do a search on under his name and see for yourself. It's been discussed before, over and over and over.

It was cheap ($$), has good performance, was simple to do, and he now has plenty of power and torque. He used many aluminum components, so the weight gain is minimal.

Not my style, but still effective, and it is still a 1st gen.
It doesn't have aluminum heads yet so its stil a bit heavier, but it is fun to drive. Thanks for not flaming.
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2002 | 02:19 PM
  #8  
Logo's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
From: Georgia
What size motor are you running? Aluminum heads should definately cut down on the weight...not to mention the power you'll gain from them.
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2002 | 07:14 PM
  #9  
Winnipeg85GSL's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 553
Likes: 0
From: Winnipeg,Manitoba
302, should easily be 250 rwhp after some nice heads and tuning.
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2002 | 07:50 PM
  #10  
Logo's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
From: Georgia
I would go with something like the afr 165's and a nice cam if you have the money. That would be closer to around 280rwhp
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2002 | 08:43 PM
  #11  
Zulu's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 357
Likes: 0
From: somewhere
400hp 302
http://www.jason.fletcher.net/tech/sherman/sherman.htm
http://66.96.130.106/archives/1999/1...se/index.shtml


400hp 305
http://www.angelfire.com/nb/thirdgen/400hp305.htm

343hp 305
http://www.goingfaster.com/spo/343hp305.html


vroom vroom
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Rotate86
Single Turbo RX-7's
5
May 18, 2018 02:44 PM
eddierotary
Engine Management Forum
16
Oct 4, 2016 08:22 PM
HalifaxFD
Canadian Forum
126
May 9, 2016 07:06 PM
qqqqball
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
11
Oct 9, 2015 07:06 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:41 AM.