1st Generation Specific (1979-1985) 1979-1985 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections

compresion test numbers... good??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 8, 2003 | 10:14 PM
  #1  
rotary_neubie's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 386
Likes: 0
From: Manitoba Canada
compresion test numbers... good??

Today I checked out the compression on a 7 I am lookin at buyin. Only took out the top two spark plugs, there was a bracket in the way of one of the bottem ones, and I was really pressed for time. The one at the front of the engine was 80 , and the rear 110. I am thinking thats not too bad.... What should those number be?
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2003 | 01:25 AM
  #2  
barnsey's Avatar
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
From: Australia
110 is excellent, 80 is dying!
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2003 | 08:13 AM
  #3  
Rx7carl's Avatar
Airflow is my life
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 6,736
Likes: 2
From: Orlando, Fl
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2003 | 08:27 AM
  #4  
rotary_neubie's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 386
Likes: 0
From: Manitoba Canada
DYING???? for real???? I thought 80 was ok....
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2003 | 08:52 AM
  #5  
Hades12's Avatar
Burning Oil-Grinding 3rd
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,094
Likes: 1
From: Union Mills NC
Should run Ok. but will be a bit low on power.
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2003 | 11:35 AM
  #6  
Rx7carl's Avatar
Airflow is my life
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 6,736
Likes: 2
From: Orlando, Fl
105-150 is Mazdas spec for a good engine. Below 70 in my experience will be impossible to start. Make sure your gauge is accurate. I checked mine against a calibrated gauge and found it read 10lbs low. So I have to add 10lbs to my readings.
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2003 | 11:50 AM
  #7  
purple82's Avatar
Absolute Power is Awesome
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,973
Likes: 5
From: Issaquah, WA
I test drove a 3rd gen that felt like it was running really well and it's compression was 61 and 63. No probs starting at all.
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2003 | 08:45 PM
  #8  
RXTbone's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 576
Likes: 2
From: Kansas
I've read a few threads where we're saying you should have compression numbers around 100 lbs, that your car is almost dead if it's at 80, etc...

According to the Mazda manual ('83), it quotes a compression pressure limit of 85 lbs., with a maximum difference between chambers of 21 lbs. (@ a cranking speed of 240-250 rpm).

Why the different numbers? Are we talking about two different things?
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2003 | 09:23 PM
  #9  
coldy13's Avatar
Yeah, shutup kid.
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,686
Likes: 2
From: Columbus, OH
Originally posted by purple82
I test drove a 3rd gen that felt like it was running really well and it's compression was 61 and 63. No probs starting at all.
They have low compression rotors since they're turbo. I don't know what their compression #'s should be, but it is supposed to be quite a bit lower than n/a engines.
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2003 | 07:25 AM
  #10  
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 376
Likes: 0
From: KY
well, I know my gauge isn't working right. I press the check valve on mine and I get 30lbs of pressue and when I leave it closed it's less than 60lbs!

Kinda impossible or I'd hate to see how it runs at 100% considering I can roast the tires in 2nd.
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2003 | 08:32 AM
  #11  
MIKE-P-28's Avatar
Driven a turbo FB lately?
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 6,444
Likes: 0
From: Fort Branch, Indiana
what about the other 2 sides of each rotor?

you really need a rotary compresion guage reading...

If any other sides of the apex seal of off too, it wont run for ****, even tho both rotors may have a 110 reading on one side of the rotor. If such is the case its indicative of a bad corner seal or side seal.
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2003 | 08:35 AM
  #12  
purple82's Avatar
Absolute Power is Awesome
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,973
Likes: 5
From: Issaquah, WA
Originally posted by coldy13
They have low compression rotors since they're turbo. I don't know what their compression #'s should be, but it is supposed to be quite a bit lower than n/a engines.
The turbos aren't spooled when the car is starting. If 60 is too low to start, it shouldn't matter if it's a turbo or not.
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2003 | 08:57 AM
  #13  
Dcrasta's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
From: WDC
Originally posted by purple82
The turbos aren't spooled when the car is starting. If 60 is too low to start, it shouldn't matter if it's a turbo or not.
Lower Static compression (Compression ratio) = Lower reading on the gauge. Higher static compression (NA engines) = Higher reading on the compression guage. Turbos help a low compression engine by raising the Dynamic compression ratio.
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2003 | 01:15 PM
  #14  
purple82's Avatar
Absolute Power is Awesome
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,973
Likes: 5
From: Issaquah, WA
Originally posted by Dcrasta
Lower Static compression (Compression ratio) = Lower reading on the gauge. Higher static compression (NA engines) = Higher reading on the compression guage. Turbos help a low compression engine by raising the Dynamic compression ratio.
What's your point?
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2003 | 01:22 PM
  #15  
coldy13's Avatar
Yeah, shutup kid.
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,686
Likes: 2
From: Columbus, OH
N/A engines have a compression ratio somewhere around 9.5:1. Turbo engines have a compression ratio around 7.5:1. So if you're doing a compression test on 2 perfect condition engines, 1 N/A, and 1 Turbo. It's obvious that the turbo engines compression test will read significantly lower.
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2003 | 01:26 PM
  #16  
DriveFast7's Avatar
Blood, Sweat and Rotors
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 3,742
Likes: 1
From: California
Re: compresion test numbers... good??

Originally posted by rotary_neubie
Today I checked out the compression on a 7 I am lookin at buyin. Only took out the top two spark plugs, there was a bracket in the way of one of the bottem ones, and I was really pressed for time. The one at the front of the engine was 80 , and the rear 110. I am thinking thats not too bad.... What should those number be?
80 is low but driveable. 110 is very good!
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2003 | 03:30 PM
  #17  
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 376
Likes: 0
From: KY
Well, my gauge is bad. I took the check valve out and get 30 for each side and when it is in I get 60. It can't be right because the car does run strong. Don't think I would be getting 2nd gear rubber with compression like that or even starting the car.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
efini7
Test Area 51
1
Sep 4, 2015 02:59 AM
elfking
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
3
Aug 19, 2015 09:48 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:34 AM.