1st Generation Specific (1979-1985) 1979-1985 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections

Compare Handling: GSL vs SE

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-25-04, 08:06 PM
  #1  
pjr
Mr May 2011

Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
pjr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Northville, MI
Posts: 1,607
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Compare Handling: GSL vs SE

Hey, can anyone here compare the handling performance between a stock GSL and a GSL-SE? I think the suspension differences are larger tires (which today are pretty much a non-issue due by adding larger aftermarket tires and wheels) and lowering the training links by 20mm.

I'm curious on how large of a difference exists. Can anyone provide their thoughts?
Old 10-25-04, 09:44 PM
  #2  
FB+FC=F-ME

 
steve84GS TII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Rohnert Park CA
Posts: 3,353
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
All 84-85 cars got the lower rear links.Far as I know,there are no suspension changes for the SE over the lesser models.Additional weight from the SE's extras would be the only thing that should affect its handling.But the wider,lower profile 14" tires should offset that a bit.
Old 10-25-04, 09:45 PM
  #3  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Gregs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: KING COUNTY, WA
Posts: 4,980
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
the se has better shocks than the non se's however the springs are the same
Old 10-25-04, 11:10 PM
  #4  
Right near Malloy

iTrader: (28)
 
Pele's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Behind a workbench, repairing FC Electronics.
Posts: 7,841
Received 510 Likes on 345 Posts
Originally Posted by Gregs
the se has better shocks than the non se's however the springs are the same
Aftermarkets should negate that... Honestly, who has 20+ yr old shocks on their car?
Old 10-25-04, 11:29 PM
  #5  
Leaking oil like crazy!

iTrader: (1)
 
1stgen4life's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Utah
Posts: 698
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Pele
Aftermarkets should negate that... Honestly, who has 20+ yr old shocks on their car?
Guilty as charged. 24 years old to be exact. Maybe I should save up and change them! They still work fine though.
Old 10-26-04, 12:25 AM
  #6  
finally back in an RX-7!!

iTrader: (1)
 
kiker14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Northern New Jersey
Posts: 847
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Pele
Aftermarkets should negate that... Honestly, who has 20+ yr old shocks on their car?
me

guess that means my shocks are older than me!
Old 10-26-04, 12:47 AM
  #7  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
GSL-SE4LIFE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: SPIZZOKOMTON
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Pele
Aftermarkets should negate that... Honestly, who has 20+ yr old shocks on their car?
i do
Old 10-26-04, 03:28 AM
  #8  
Ricer

iTrader: (4)
 
IanS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Washington, Iowa
Posts: 4,424
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
^^^ Me too. Hopefully they will get a few years newer tomorrow though lol.

Gotta love being broke and having a parts car WOOO
Old 10-26-04, 05:50 AM
  #9  
I read your email

 
inittab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: NW New Jersey
Posts: 2,624
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I think the non-power steering GSL handles better. The power steering in the SE does not provide very good road feedback IMO.
Old 10-26-04, 06:04 AM
  #10  
I'm old but not slow

 
Brianhsval's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Huntsville,Al
Posts: 777
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
my SE has no power steering and I didn't know there was any comparison to an SE. j/k
Old 10-26-04, 08:49 PM
  #11  
pjr
Mr May 2011

Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
pjr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Northville, MI
Posts: 1,607
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by steve84GS TII
All 84-85 cars got the lower rear links...

Actually, I am pretty sure that only the SE got the links, as well as the 14" wheels and wider tires. Most SE RX-7s came with PS, but it was an option.

I didn't know about the shocks. The SE is shorter steering from lock to lock as well.

I guess my question is more subjective than a review of specs. To those of you that have driven both, do you find a significant difference? Or is the difference pretty much eliminated by adding wider and modern wheeks and tires to the non-SE?

Thanks!
Old 10-26-04, 08:58 PM
  #12  
5 inches of Fury!

 
Solid Snake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Livermore, CA
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking

Originally Posted by Pele
Aftermarkets should negate that... Honestly, who has 20+ yr old shocks on their car?
*raises hand* But, that'll change pretty soon.
Old 10-26-04, 09:02 PM
  #13  
Junior Member

 
NewWorldDan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Tiverton, RI
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking

Originally Posted by Pele
Aftermarkets should negate that... Honestly, who has 20+ yr old shocks on their car?
Me Too!
Old 10-26-04, 09:10 PM
  #14  
Senior Member

 
Hadoken's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Hickory,North Carolina
Posts: 336
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think I do, are the stock shocks on the SE's KYB brand shocks? I wasn't aware that was original equipment, but they looked original.

My SE doesn't have power steering either...
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
NickNac113
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
13
10-01-15 09:25 PM



Quick Reply: Compare Handling: GSL vs SE



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:38 PM.