1st Generation Specific (1979-1985) 1979-1985 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections

Camber Thread.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-10-10, 07:48 PM
  #1  
Actin Like I'm Drunk

Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
jshiz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Charleston, South Carolina
Posts: 1,663
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Camber Thread.

Alright, I've been searching around to find different opinions on adjustable lower control arms vs camber plates. My car is lower to the point that my front suspesion's camber is altered. Now I need some way to adjust it. Right now I'm leaning to pick up RB's adjustable lower control arm http://www.racingbeat.com/FRmazda1.htm since I need to replace my control arm anyways. Has anybody here used these. What are there pro's & cons versus camber plates? I just want some opinions before I pull the trigger on these.
Old 05-10-10, 08:04 PM
  #2  
Smoov-e "Dick Like Mine"

iTrader: (2)
 
MaX PoWeR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Nor Cal assassin
Posts: 542
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
respeed camber plates FTW!!!!
Old 05-10-10, 08:08 PM
  #3  
GET OFF MY LAWN

iTrader: (1)
 
jgrewe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Fla.
Posts: 2,837
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I'd go with camber plates. How much adjustment do the arms give you and does the steering linkage have enough adjustment to keep up with them?
Old 05-10-10, 08:20 PM
  #4  
Actin Like I'm Drunk

Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
jshiz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Charleston, South Carolina
Posts: 1,663
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by jgrewe
I'd go with camber plates. How much adjustment do the arms give you and does the steering linkage have enough adjustment to keep up with them?

Originally Posted by Racingbeat website
RX-7 Adjustable Front Lower Control Arms add a new dimension of adjustability to your car. In order to get the most from your 1979-85 RX-7's chassis, you need camber adjustability. Racers know that even with moderate size radial tires, it is possible to get improved front cornering power by increasing the camber to four or five degrees. While tire wear at this setting is high, the camber can be changed quite easily after initial setup with this kit, adjusting from race to street setting easily. This kit also allows you to correct an error in your chassis, or to pre-set incremental negative camber for better handling all the time (we recommend .5 degrees negative camber maximum for continuous use).

These arms can be shortened up to .5-inch from stock (approximately 1.3 degrees more positive camber than stock) or lengthened up to 1.625-inches from stock (approximately 4.4 degrees more negative camber than stock). The original rubber inner joint is retained to isolate road shocks and noise.

When front wheel negative camber is increased with this kit, there is a possibility that the front tire may contact the fender under some combination of bump and turn. This is especially true if wider-than stock wheels and tires are fitted. It is the user's responsibility to determine that there is adequate clearance for his application.
As far as steering linkage, mine is just the stock GSL SE suspension. I just replaced all of the wear/n/tear stuff from it. I just want enough adjustment to get the camber nuetral when i align it so i wont eat the insides of my front tires prematurely.
Old 05-10-10, 08:20 PM
  #5  
Old Fart Young at Heart

iTrader: (6)
 
trochoid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: St Joe MO
Posts: 15,145
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
I have both on the widebody. The LCAs are adjusted so far out that the cambers plates can only bring the alignment back to -3*. Not good for the street. Go with the camber plates and replace the ball joints.
Old 05-10-10, 08:25 PM
  #6  
Actin Like I'm Drunk

Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
jshiz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Charleston, South Carolina
Posts: 1,663
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
^

I've already replace the balljoints. I have them tac wielded on but the lower control arms are "warped" so that even though, they are welded in they just don't sit right. So I'm going to replace the control arms regardless.
Old 05-11-10, 05:19 AM
  #7  
Senior Member

iTrader: (2)
 
RXDad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Newark, DE
Posts: 304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have the LCAs. They are a pain to adjust. In order to get to the adjustment bolts, you usually have to break apart the lower ball joint and spindle connection. Once you make an adjustment, your toe needs to be readjusted. Some report that the adjustment may slip if you are not careful. If you can go with camber plates, you might have less problems.

They are capable of more than -2+ deg of camber.

Not sure of the problems with them and steering geometry once you get to high camber angles. I'm running -1 1/2 deg.

RXDad
Old 05-11-10, 08:55 AM
  #8  
Lives on the Forum

 
Kentetsu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Grand Rapids Michigan
Posts: 11,359
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts
I decided to go with the camber plates, and I don't regret the decision. The main reasons I did not go with the control arms is because:

a. You have to get under the car (or remove a wheel) to adjust them.
b. the adjustment points are under the car, where they will collect the most dirt and debris, most likely making adjustments that much more difficult.
c. Changing the length of the control arm will have a much more drastic effect on toe settings, so each time you make a change your alignement will be off and have to be reset.

With the camber plates, adjustments can be made in under a minute. I usually crank mine to max camber before a race, then set it back close to stock for the drive home. If there is any effect on the toe settings, it is not noticeable.

Also, the Respeed camber plates are set up to add increased caster, which is a good thing. Adjustable control arms cannot do this.

The only thing that might be a problem for you is that if you are using stock type strut inserts, then the shaft (where it goes through the bearing on the camber plate) will have to be turned down to reduce the diameter. I did this with my original installation, and its not a big deal if you own a dremel. Or, you can drop them off at a machine shop and have it done for 20 bucks or so (it only takes a minute to do this work). The other option (if you can afford it, this is a great upgrade) is to get the "race" version of the Illumina strut inserts from Respeed. These are adjustable, so you can go from race track stiff to cadillac comfort with a simple twist of the adjustment ****, which is located at the top of the strut so its easy to get at and only takes a second once you pop the hood.

Best of luck with your project, feel free to let me know if you have any questions. Otherwise, you can contact Billy here by PM (Bwaits_) and he will be happy to advise you.




.
Old 05-12-10, 12:43 AM
  #9  
Actin Like I'm Drunk

Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
jshiz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Charleston, South Carolina
Posts: 1,663
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
^Thank you for your input. I think i'll go with the plates.
Old 05-12-10, 12:57 AM
  #10  
We're All Fkd..

iTrader: (16)
 
AcidAngel7477's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Whittier,CA
Posts: 8,722
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
good info here..

:AA:
Old 05-12-10, 08:51 PM
  #11  
My 7 is my girlfriend.

iTrader: (5)
 
orion84gsl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: London, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 3,162
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I went with them too, because Kentetsu did. His car kicks ***, so why not follow his example.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
renjiv2
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
57
01-25-24 03:34 AM
Spirit Rx-7
Suspension/Wheels/Tires/Brakes
6
03-14-16 12:36 PM
imitek
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
13
10-28-15 10:57 AM



Quick Reply: Camber Thread.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:54 AM.