1st Generation Specific (1979-1985) 1979-1985 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections

Best shell for TII swap

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 16, 2004 | 10:01 PM
  #1  
Rx7r4c3r's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
From: Ottawa, Canada
Best shell for TII swap

I have a 1979 shell that I want to use for my TII swap. Is a 84-85 shell better and why? I would like info on weight difference and info on the rear links, I hear they are 20mm lower or something. Thanks.

btw: I will be puting gsl-se front end and rear end on the 79 body.
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2004 | 10:12 PM
  #2  
KehoeAutomotive's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 505
Likes: 2
From: New Orleans, LA
I'm putting a TII into a SA chassis right now.

I would like to know that info myself.
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2004 | 10:25 PM
  #3  
Rx7r4c3r's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
From: Ottawa, Canada
heh, If I remember correctly I think the 84-85 gls-se shells are lighter and steer better because of lowered rear links. I think the older sa's are heavier and steer diferently. I remember some people saying theres not much diference and some that says there is alot. Any feedback is great.
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2004 | 10:56 PM
  #4  
82streetracer's Avatar
8/1 Building/Drive Ratio
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,397
Likes: 1
From: Mound, MN
I am putting a tII motor in a 82 "S", I dont know how much it weighs but it cant be much, the car has NOTHING.

Manuel window, steering and mirrors. No AC, nothin.
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2004 | 11:03 PM
  #5  
FC Wanna-B's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
From: Friendswood, Tx
well i'm not an exspert on thease cars nor have any cradability but i would think that a 84-85 GSL-SE would be the ideal car to swap the Tll engine cause it was allready an FI car to begin with and your just updateing the 13 thats allready in there

but what do i know
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2004 | 11:09 PM
  #6  
Dan H's Avatar
Zoom Zoom Boom!
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,312
Likes: 0
From: San Francisco, CA
The GSL-SE would be the easiest to swap in also since it comes with a lot of the stuff you need as well for the TII conversion.
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2004 | 07:15 AM
  #7  
FC Wanna-B's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
From: Friendswood, Tx
well looky there i'm not the only one that thinks this... cool!
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2004 | 12:12 PM
  #8  
eddierotary's Avatar
back with rotaries
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,239
Likes: 1
From: Watertown, NY
gslse shell is easy swap but is heavier, gslse wheight about 2500 pound stock with the turbo and everything on it add about 100 more. while the SA only whieghts 2200 pounds
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2004 | 03:24 PM
  #9  
82streetracer's Avatar
8/1 Building/Drive Ratio
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,397
Likes: 1
From: Mound, MN
yeh, too put the 13bt in my motor, I needed a GSL SE front cover, oil pan and pickup. as well as a Racingbeat 12a to 13b conversion engine mount for the front.

but I have the lighter car. 300 lbs is a lot when its a 12% reduction is weight.

The SE is much easier to do the swap as far as parts go, but my engine bay is super clean. I love how it looks.
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2004 | 03:25 PM
  #10  
82streetracer's Avatar
8/1 Building/Drive Ratio
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,397
Likes: 1
From: Mound, MN
Mmmmmm Mmmmmmmm Bitch, 2000 posts.
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2004 | 10:39 PM
  #11  
Rx7r4c3r's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
From: Ottawa, Canada
Im doing the complete deal, Standalone everything, ported, Big turbo, fmic, everything front-back new. I have a SA body right now thats in pretty good shape. the unibody frame rails are striaght with no dents from people jacking. Evertything is mint everywere. I have already converted the SA wiring harness into a FB Harness so it has the newer engine in it with complete FB interior. The bumpers are still SA but will be replaced by body kit. So this is what I want to use for my shell. I have a gsl-se front end and rear end that I will sandblast and paint and put new brakes, suspension, bushings etc. I have the 91 TII motor S5. I will be rebuilding this with probably a streetport for starters ( I want a bridge port, but this will be my summer daily driver.). New rotors and housings. Custom everything. Interior, Exterior everything. Anyways Im chewing on alot right now, Im expecting this to take like a year and a half because of money issues but I will hopefully post some pics when im finished. Also since there will not be any stock stuff left I dont really need to start with a gsl-se. leme know what you guys think about the shell. So far I have one guy that says the SA shells are lighter. I think thats the compromise the SA's are lighter but the FB's particularily 84-85 steer better (less oversteer). If this is wrong please let me know. Ive owned FB's before 80-83 fb's and I think I notice abit difference between the SA and the FB, but I never had both cars in mint condition so its really hard to say. At this point im going to do it in a SA unless I hear some good reasons to go get a FB shell.
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2004 | 11:29 PM
  #12  
Keaponlaffen's Avatar
---------------------
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,029
Likes: 0
From: Kamloops BC Canada
Originally posted by 82streetracer
Mmmmmm Mmmmmmmm Bitch, 2000 posts.
Post *****



Reply
Old Feb 18, 2004 | 08:35 AM
  #13  
Steve Shulz's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 566
Likes: 0
From: Gig Harbor, WA
Personally I would do the -SE, it has the better suspension, bigger brakes all around, and your choice of wheels when your ready. It also has the beefier rear end and a high flow fuel pump (if needed). Parts are a little harder but well worth it for the extra 300 lbs. IMO
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2004 | 08:40 AM
  #14  
kleinke's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
From: Yumpenoffenhoff
If you plan to have it lower than stock ride height you are better off with the series 1 or 2 shell. The mounts in the 84-85 are actually make it handle worse when you lower the car. At least that is my experience. But if you plan to get rid of the Watts, it is a moot point. Only advantage of a SE is the larger fuel lines and pump which are easy enough to replace and the body is much heavier. I say go with whatever is lighter.
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2004 | 01:16 PM
  #15  
RotaryRevn's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,410
Likes: 2
Originally posted by 82streetracer
The SE is much easier to do the swap as far as parts go, but my engine bay is super clean. I love how it looks.

Yeah, I'm looking for a gslse for my swap but lately I was thinking it may be easier (wiring wise) to use a non se. I will be using a Microtech so it will have it's own harness. I just remember trying to separate the se engine harness from the rest of the electronics (headlights ect). The engine harness seemed to be intertwined with all the other electronics so I just gave up.
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2004 | 06:27 PM
  #16  
Rx7r4c3r's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
From: Ottawa, Canada
Ya I will be lowering it with the tokico shocks/springs. And I will have the bigger brakes and rims since im swapping to the gsl-se rear/front ends. So I gess the SA will be the best car to use. Thanks for all the info guys.
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2004 | 08:33 PM
  #17  
RotaryRevn's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,410
Likes: 2
Originally posted by 82streetracer


The SE is much easier to do the swap as far as parts go, but my engine bay is super clean. I love how it looks.
Any pics of your engine bay?
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2004 | 09:08 PM
  #18  
iyaseven's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
From: seattle, wa., usa
Re: Best shell for TII swap

Originally posted by Rx7r4c3r
I have a 1979 shell that I want to use for my TII swap. Is a 84-85 shell better and why? I would like info on weight difference and info on the rear links, I hear they are 20mm lower or something. Thanks.

btw: I will be puting gsl-se front end and rear end on the 79 body.
you might want to check out www.autospeed.com its a online mag with lots of 1st gen turbos featured. from looking it seems most 79' and 80's.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
befarrer
Old School and Other Rotary
2
Oct 5, 2015 03:30 AM
Nosferatu
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
7
Sep 5, 2015 02:13 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:06 PM.