79 engine
#2
FD > FB > FC
yeah sure you can put the engine in, however the 79 has a thermal reactor, and the 85 uses catalytic convertors. The carb is slightly different as well. So answer your question, you can but realisticly, you can only use the bare block, and bolt everything from the 85 on it.
#3
Old [Sch|F]ool
Yes you can, as long as you don't have to pass emissions.
https://www.rx7club.com/showthread.p...al#post2807501 explains the differences handily.
https://www.rx7club.com/showthread.p...al#post2807501 explains the differences handily.
#4
Old [Sch|F]ool
Originally posted by hornbm
yeah sure you can put the engine in, however the 79 has a thermal reactor, and the 85 uses catalytic convertors. The carb is slightly different as well. So answer your question, you can but realisticly, you can only use the bare block, and bolt everything from the 85 on it.
yeah sure you can put the engine in, however the 79 has a thermal reactor, and the 85 uses catalytic convertors. The carb is slightly different as well. So answer your question, you can but realisticly, you can only use the bare block, and bolt everything from the 85 on it.
The SA carb seems to run better than the later junk. I never understood why Sterling was so horny for making the accelerator pump shot bigger and bigger, until I went from using an '80 carb to an '85 carb. Whoa Nellie, big difference there!
Search is slow as hell lately... here's another link:
https://www.rx7club.com/showthread.p...ns#post2849828
#5
Use the 79 carb and intake, its higher flowing and has bigger ports. Trash that 90 lb piece of **** thermal reactor. its a heavy waste of perfect iron.
The 79s had catalytic converters in addition to it's thermal reactor though. Oh, and you can use 85 exhaust headers instead of that reactor. They are lighter and a bit more freeflowing.
The 79s had catalytic converters in addition to it's thermal reactor though. Oh, and you can use 85 exhaust headers instead of that reactor. They are lighter and a bit more freeflowing.
#7
FD > FB > FC
Originally posted by shm21284
Use the 79 carb and intake, its higher flowing and has bigger ports. Trash that 90 lb piece of **** thermal reactor. its a heavy waste of perfect iron.
The 79s had catalytic converters in addition to it's thermal reactor though. Oh, and you can use 85 exhaust headers instead of that reactor. They are lighter and a bit more freeflowing.
Use the 79 carb and intake, its higher flowing and has bigger ports. Trash that 90 lb piece of **** thermal reactor. its a heavy waste of perfect iron.
The 79s had catalytic converters in addition to it's thermal reactor though. Oh, and you can use 85 exhaust headers instead of that reactor. They are lighter and a bit more freeflowing.
Trending Topics
#9
I have a picture of the Heat Exchanger/Catalytic Converter, whatever it is.
It is on my newly bought '79(I'm a newbie), so is it a cat or not? My car has got a new header installed by the previous owner, så I guess the Thermal Reactor is gone - if the box in the picture in fact is a heat-exchanger, can I remove it with no effect on emissions?
thanks
Alex
It is on my newly bought '79(I'm a newbie), so is it a cat or not? My car has got a new header installed by the previous owner, så I guess the Thermal Reactor is gone - if the box in the picture in fact is a heat-exchanger, can I remove it with no effect on emissions?
thanks
Alex
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
trickster
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
25
07-01-23 04:40 PM
KAL797
Test Area 51
0
08-11-15 03:47 PM