1st Generation Specific (1979-1985) 1979-1985 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections

3'' exaust

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 7, 2004 | 02:18 PM
  #1  
BIG J MIXALOT's Avatar
Thread Starter
SHSHSHA POCKET SAND
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 611
Likes: 0
From: Monroe Wa
Question 3'' exaust

has anyone ever done it on a first gen before? i am thinking of doing it cause mine is all rusty.
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2004 | 02:41 PM
  #2  
d0 Luck's Avatar
raysspl.com
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,508
Likes: 0
From: L.A.
Originally Posted by BIG J MIXALOT
has anyone ever done it on a first gen before? i am thinking of doing it cause mine is all rusty.
yes, i did. and i coupled it w/ a straight through dual muffler
it was LOUD... waaaayyyyy too loud. i didn't like it. but what you can do is run 2 presilencers then muffler. it should quiet it down a bit

reason for my 3" = upcoming bridgeport

Reply
Old Sep 7, 2004 | 02:44 PM
  #3  
Elysian's Avatar
Bimmer *****
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,199
Likes: 1
From: Plano, TX
i had 3" on my last TII... straight pipe... i can only imagine how much louder it would be on a NA car... god...
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2004 | 02:48 PM
  #4  
steve84GS TII's Avatar
FB+FC=F-ME
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 3,353
Likes: 5
From: Rohnert Park CA
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v2...y/DSC01504.jpg

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v2...y/DSC01487.jpg

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v2...y/DSC01483.jpg

3" mandrel bent stainless.Light and rust proof,but $$$ to fabricate.

Its really not needed unless you are running a turbo. A 3" system on a N/A is just going to be loud and heavy,unless you need the flow(bridgeport,PP,ect)
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2004 | 02:51 PM
  #5  
Siraniko's Avatar
RX for fun
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 15,926
Likes: 25
From: Socal
if ur running a n/a, 2.5 single is the ideal size as 3" is just way too big for street use. FYI: rb presilencer for 1st gen is way too small for a big ported motor. so use 2nd gen instead. flows much better.

Last edited by Siraniko; Sep 7, 2004 at 03:04 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2004 | 02:53 PM
  #6  
d0 Luck's Avatar
raysspl.com
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,508
Likes: 0
From: L.A.
Originally Posted by steve84GS TII
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v2...y/DSC01504.jpg

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v2...y/DSC01487.jpg

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v2...y/DSC01483.jpg

3" mandrel bent stainless.Light and rust proof,but $$$ to fabricate.

Its really not needed unless you are running a turbo. A 3" system on a N/A is just going to be loud and heavy,unless you need the flow(bridgeport,PP,ect)
hey, where can i get mandrel bent piping done??

thanks!
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2004 | 03:39 PM
  #7  
BIG J MIXALOT's Avatar
Thread Starter
SHSHSHA POCKET SAND
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 611
Likes: 0
From: Monroe Wa
i am thinking of turboing my 12a and having 3" exaust steve84GS TII thanks for the pictures
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2004 | 03:51 PM
  #8  
RotaryRyan's Avatar
DSM
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,070
Likes: 1
From: Milton, FL
Originally Posted by steve84GS TII
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v2...y/DSC01504.jpg

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v2...y/DSC01487.jpg

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v2...y/DSC01483.jpg

3" mandrel bent stainless.Light and rust proof,but $$$ to fabricate.

Its really not needed unless you are running a turbo. A 3" system on a N/A is just going to be loud and heavy,unless you need the flow(bridgeport,PP,ect)
Thats some serious stuff right there! looks good
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2004 | 03:52 PM
  #9  
web777's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,228
Likes: 0
From: LOS ANGELES
Originally Posted by steve84GS TII
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v2...y/DSC01504.jpg

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v2...y/DSC01487.jpg

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v2...y/DSC01483.jpg

3" mandrel bent stainless.Light and rust proof,but $$$ to fabricate.

Its really not needed unless you are running a turbo. A 3" system on a N/A is just going to be loud and heavy,unless you need the flow(bridgeport,PP,ect)

Are you using a Primaflow? I had 3" all the way down with 2 mufflers and it was too loud. I use a primaflow now which is quiet but I'm losing alot of top end.
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2004 | 06:01 PM
  #10  
Elysian's Avatar
Bimmer *****
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,199
Likes: 1
From: Plano, TX
Originally Posted by steve84GS TII
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v2...y/DSC01504.jpg

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v2...y/DSC01487.jpg

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v2...y/DSC01483.jpg

3" mandrel bent stainless.Light and rust proof,but $$$ to fabricate.

Its really not needed unless you are running a turbo. A 3" system on a N/A is just going to be loud and heavy,unless you need the flow(bridgeport,PP,ect)
thats perty.... perty f*ckin big!
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2004 | 07:24 PM
  #11  
steve84GS TII's Avatar
FB+FC=F-ME
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 3,353
Likes: 5
From: Rohnert Park CA
Big,yes....but it tucks in well and never scrapes.I run a RB TII presilencer as a main muffler when I want it loud(which is almost never),notice the 3 bolt flange at the muffler inlet.....its really loud,even with the cat and turbo.Turbos do kill noise but theres so much on a rotary its still just unbearable inside the cabin.

My quiet muffler,(and it is very quiet) is the RB Primaflow(Powerpulse,whatever) STREETPORT version.Its a bit louder than the standard RB muffler,but more importantly it has a 2.5" inlet.It was just a matter of taking a plasma cutter to the inlet and opening it up a bit to the full 3".Then weld on the flange and bolt it up.The inner baffles in the muffler split in two just after the inlet.It might be a little restrictive,but its still straight through,its very quiet,bulletproof and Ive been running 14psi through it no problem for years.

The local muffler shop got the pre-bent mandrel pieces and the straight runs from a steel place in the city.They actually stock mild steel mandrels,they had to order the stainless stuff.Shouldnt be too hard for any muffler shop to come by,especially one that does work on RV and semi exhausts.....
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2004 | 02:06 AM
  #12  
Rotor13B's Avatar
Wassup!!
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,081
Likes: 1
From: Longmont Co.
Originally Posted by steve84GS TII
Big,yes....but it tucks in well and never scrapes.I run a RB TII presilencer as a main muffler when I want it loud(which is almost never),notice the 3 bolt flange at the muffler inlet.....its really loud,even with the cat and turbo.Turbos do kill noise but theres so much on a rotary its still just unbearable inside the cabin.

My quiet muffler,(and it is very quiet) is the RB Primaflow(Powerpulse,whatever) STREETPORT version.Its a bit louder than the standard RB muffler,but more importantly it has a 2.5" inlet.It was just a matter of taking a plasma cutter to the inlet and opening it up a bit to the full 3".Then weld on the flange and bolt it up.The inner baffles in the muffler split in two just after the inlet.It might be a little restrictive,but its still straight through,its very quiet,bulletproof and Ive been running 14psi through it no problem for years.

The local muffler shop got the pre-bent mandrel pieces and the straight runs from a steel place in the city.They actually stock mild steel mandrels,they had to order the stainless stuff.Shouldnt be too hard for any muffler shop to come by,especially one that does work on RV and semi exhausts.....
Does it still have that RB raspiness sound?
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2004 | 02:12 AM
  #13  
cpt_gloval's Avatar
KARATE EXPLOSION
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,991
Likes: 34
From: Deadmonds, WA
on the gray '83? stick to stock diameter piping. it only gets louder from there!
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2004 | 07:53 AM
  #14  
mortenf's Avatar
506 RWHP 12A..
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 485
Likes: 3
From: Norway
For a NA car, there is absolutely no reason to go past 2,5". Running my streetported 13b 4port on a dyno, a 3" actually showed a decrease in power. All engines, the rotary included, needs a little bit of resistance to work properly.

Ditch the standard system though, and go for 2,5". Use stainless steel, and the biggest freeflow mufflers you can get fit. My system sounds tolerable under 3K, but i must admit it gets a little bit noisy after that... Much of witch relates to the way the pipes and mufflers are mounted.
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2004 | 12:32 PM
  #15  
steve84GS TII's Avatar
FB+FC=F-ME
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 3,353
Likes: 5
From: Rohnert Park CA
Theres no rasp at all in my system.Its the standard, RB muted tone,that accompanied by a jet engines-like whoosh at full power.Inside the cabin you can hear the exhaust the whole time,but its just a light bass tone,no buzzing or resonance.
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2004 | 12:35 PM
  #16  
cpt_gloval's Avatar
KARATE EXPLOSION
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,991
Likes: 34
From: Deadmonds, WA
Originally Posted by mortenf
For a NA car, there is absolutely no reason to go past 2,5". Running my streetported 13b 4port on a dyno, a 3" actually showed a decrease in power. All engines, the rotary included, needs a little bit of resistance to work properly.
.
i thought it was a matter of maintaining exhaust velocity to get the scavenging action goin' on.
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2004 | 12:50 PM
  #17  
steve84GS TII's Avatar
FB+FC=F-ME
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 3,353
Likes: 5
From: Rohnert Park CA
Thats right,smaller piping will increase velocity and scavenging,to a point.When the backpressure becomes a hinderance to the escaping gasses,then youve gone too small.Its a balancing act between maintaining gas velocity,for scavenging effect(by not going too big)....and keeping backpressure from choking the engine off(from going too small)

The exception is with turbos.Bigger is better because they blend the exhaust pulses at the turbine,so scavenging and pulse tuning are pointless after the turbo.You just wanna releive the pressure on the backside of the turbine as quickly as possible by having a nice big exhaust system.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Gefunk
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
12
Mar 6, 2002 02:23 PM
pp13bnos
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
23
Dec 19, 2001 08:38 AM
JeremyII
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
12
Oct 25, 2001 04:20 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:04 PM.