1st Generation Specific (1979-1985) 1979-1985 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections

1st gen parts weight list

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 11, 2009 | 03:35 PM
  #1  
ported12at's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 356
Likes: 0
From: Augusta, Ga.
1st gen parts weight list

For those (including myself) interested in what their car weighs with each part that is replaced, or simply tossed to the back of the garage. I'd like to have a thread that shows the weight of both common and uncommon parts that are removed from, or replaced on fbs. From front to back, top to bottom, inside and out!!! I'd start it by weighing something myself, but I don't have a scale. I will however, start this off with the weight of each model.

A=automatic transmission
M=manual transmission



79-80
3sp-A=2410lbs
4sp-M=2350lbs
5sp-M=2385lbs

81-83
3sp-A=2360lbs
5sp-M=2335lbs

84-85
4sp-A=2300
5sp-M(non GSL-SE)=2335
5sp-M-GSL-SE=2640
Attached Thumbnails 1st gen parts weight list-seans-stuff-014.jpg  
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2009 | 04:10 PM
  #2  
thunkrd's Avatar
i'm a poser
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,919
Likes: 0
From: san leandro, Ca
i'm wondering why the se weighs 300 pounds more than nonse
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2009 | 05:25 PM
  #3  
Jeff20B's Avatar
Lapping = Fapping
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 15,725
Likes: 91
From: Near Seattle
The engine isn't really THAT much heavier than a 12A, is it?
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2009 | 05:34 PM
  #4  
3rd and final 7's Avatar
wheres the water goin?
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,586
Likes: 0
From: Nor Cal
not really i dont think so but the upgraded axles, diff , brakes, bigger wheels and tires, sunroof supports.
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2009 | 08:14 PM
  #5  
BlackWorksInc's Avatar
Wrkn Toyota, Rootn Wankel
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,642
Likes: 1
From: "Haystack" Hayward, CA
Still... 300 extra? 120~150 is more reasonable...
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2009 | 08:56 PM
  #6  
Jeff20B's Avatar
Lapping = Fapping
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 15,725
Likes: 91
From: Near Seattle
The intermediate plate does weigh a little more because it has motor mount castings at the bottom on both sides. The rotors are 11.5 pounds each. 12A rotors of the time were more like 9.5 pounds. The flywheel is the same weight as the '83-'85 12A at 26 pounds. The rotor housings are slightly heavier due to length. The shaft and tension bolts are slightly longer. There are 18 tension bolt on the GSL-SE engine compared to 17 of the 12A. The intake manifold contains more aluminum than a 12A. Water pumps and exhaust systems should be about the same.
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2009 | 10:22 PM
  #7  
Jeezus's Avatar
Stu-Tron Get Yo Groove On
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 8,482
Likes: 31
From: Huntsville AL
This isn't a bad idea. I might go out to the garage tomorrow and start weighing miscellaneous engine parts and add to this thread.
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2009 | 01:44 AM
  #8  
84stock's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 5,547
Likes: 12
From: calgary
bigger wheels, tires, brakes, etc adds up pretty quick. A lot more happening in the engine bay, compare all the intake, afm, etc to a simple nikki and tiny 12a intake. Engine weight, yeah a few pounds there. Rear diff, probably a few there too along with other suspension differences. Leather seats weigh a ton too. Perhaps more interior insulation? Stereo system with amps vs basic. Maybe the weight listed for a 12a model is a basic gs, no sunroof?? All the little stuff can add up pretty quick.
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2009 | 09:11 AM
  #9  
ported12at's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 356
Likes: 0
From: Augusta, Ga.
I'm sure that there are some slight differences in weight between base and gsl models. I just wanted to have a platform to get everyone started on. Also, I didn't see an auto option listed for the gsl-se, didn't know they were all 5sp...
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2009 | 12:36 PM
  #10  
thunkrd's Avatar
i'm a poser
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,919
Likes: 0
From: san leandro, Ca
i'm pretty sure all gslse were 5speeds
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2009 | 03:01 PM
  #11  
Jeezus's Avatar
Stu-Tron Get Yo Groove On
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 8,482
Likes: 31
From: Huntsville AL
Originally Posted by DemonSpawn67
Still... 300 extra? 120~150 is more reasonable...
http://grassrootsmotorsports.com/articles/lucky-7/

"Thanks to the bigger wheels, more luxurious options and a more complicated induction system, the GSL-SE was more than 200 pounds heavier than its predecessor, so performance was not that startling. Many autocrossers opted to stay with their earlier cars, especially considering the more favorable classing of those 12A-powered RX-7s. "

Got bored, found info.
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2009 | 04:36 PM
  #12  
BlackWorksInc's Avatar
Wrkn Toyota, Rootn Wankel
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,642
Likes: 1
From: "Haystack" Hayward, CA
Wow... Glad my suspension is from a 12A car...
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2009 | 01:19 AM
  #13  
thunkrd's Avatar
i'm a poser
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,919
Likes: 0
From: san leandro, Ca
the suspension isn't much different from 12a to 13b... mostly just brakes
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2009 | 04:52 AM
  #14  
sen2two's Avatar
Rx2 > FD
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,361
Likes: 8
From: Florida, Orlando
i would like to know body parts weight...

I just got a set of fiberglass fenders, doors, hood, front bumper, and front panel. im wondering how much weight that will drop me too.
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2009 | 09:21 AM
  #15  
Kentetsu's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 11,359
Likes: 14
From: Grand Rapids Michigan
'85 GS:

Emissions = 1.1 tons
Exhaust = 0.734 tons
Water pump housing = gotta be like 30 pounds.
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2009 | 11:19 AM
  #16  
mustanghammer's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 15 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,578
Likes: 288
From: Parkville, Mo
Actually the rear end housing/diff is the same between and GSL and a GSL/SE in 84-85. The front spindles/strut tubes are too.

The cross member on the SE is different as is the front motor mt plate. Rear axles are different between the GSL and GLS/SE but they both use the same bearing, seal, retainer and side gear.

To me it would be the Pwr steering, bigger brakes, wheels and lux equipment that would account for the difference in weight.
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2009 | 11:32 AM
  #17  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Moderator
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,837
Likes: 3,234
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Originally Posted by 84stock
bigger wheels, tires, brakes, etc adds up pretty quick. A lot more happening in the engine bay, compare all the intake, afm, etc to a simple nikki and tiny 12a intake. Engine weight, yeah a few pounds there. Rear diff, probably a few there too along with other suspension differences. Leather seats weigh a ton too. Perhaps more interior insulation? Stereo system with amps vs basic. Maybe the weight listed for a 12a model is a basic gs, no sunroof?? All the little stuff can add up pretty quick.
the "simple" nikki and "tiny" intake are like 50lbs! i would bet the gsl-se complete setup is within a pound of two.
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2009 | 12:55 PM
  #18  
Jeff20B's Avatar
Lapping = Fapping
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 15,725
Likes: 91
From: Near Seattle
The cast iron waterpump is only about 16 pounds.

I thought the Nikki plus other intake stuff was closer to 30 pounds.
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2009 | 01:12 PM
  #19  
Hades12's Avatar
Burning Oil-Grinding 3rd
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,094
Likes: 1
From: Union Mills NC
SE's had power stearing also.


I had a collection of weights from when I was shipping out a lot of stuff. I will see if I can find it.
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2009 | 01:14 PM
  #20  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Moderator
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,837
Likes: 3,234
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Originally Posted by Jeff20B
The cast iron waterpump is only about 16 pounds.

I thought the Nikki plus other intake stuff was closer to 30 pounds.
that's probably right. sarcastic answer; and other measurements as well!
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2009 | 01:26 PM
  #21  
gsl-se addict's Avatar
Super Moderator
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,088
Likes: 11
From: Lynchburg, VA
The weight difference between SE and non-SE models is pretty simple. The fact is the the non-SE weight is an average of sorts between the various models and many of them came to the US without AC (so AC is not included in the weight for the most part). The AC systems in the 12A cars were typically installed at the port or by dealers. All of the SEs came with factory installed AC, so that is included in the weight.

If you put an S3 GSL (with AC) on the scales and then a GSL-SE with the same options, you'll find the weight difference to be almost nill. You have to remember that a GSL is really the same thing as the GSL-SE with the exception of the engine. There are other small differences (like bigger brakes), but these differences are very small. For instance, the GSL-SE has larger brake rotors, but the GSL-SE is vented on all 4 wheels where the GSL discs are solid on the rear. Wheels are larger on the GSL-SE, but I doubt they are really any heavier (and the difference would not be significant to the total weight of the car if there is a difference there).

If you are going to compare the weights on the cars, you need to compare apples to apples. There is a big difference between the S and a loaded GSL in terms of weight, but not much difference between a loaded GSL and a GSL-SE. Plus, you got a signicant increase in power, torque, and a wider powerband with those few extra pounds on the GSL-SE model. If you are wanting light, start with a basic S model and go from there.

Edit: Also the S3 GSL and GSL-SE could be had with or without power steering.

Last edited by gsl-se addict; Oct 14, 2009 at 01:28 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2009 | 11:10 PM
  #22  
ported12at's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 356
Likes: 0
From: Augusta, Ga.
I had a collection of weights from when I was shipping out a lot of stuff. I will see if I can find it.[/QUOTE]

That would be awesome! Thanks.
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2009 | 12:46 AM
  #23  
martinhickey's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
From: Oregon
Originally Posted by gsl-se addict
The weight difference between SE and non-SE models is pretty simple. The fact is the the non-SE weight is an average of sorts between the various models and many of them came to the US without AC (so AC is not included in the weight for the most part). The AC systems in the 12A cars were typically installed at the port or by dealers. All of the SEs came with factory installed AC, so that is included in the weight.

If you put an S3 GSL (with AC) on the scales and then a GSL-SE with the same options, you'll find the weight difference to be almost nill. You have to remember that a GSL is really the same thing as the GSL-SE with the exception of the engine. There are other small differences (like bigger brakes), but these differences are very small. For instance, the GSL-SE has larger brake rotors, but the GSL-SE is vented on all 4 wheels where the GSL discs are solid on the rear. Wheels are larger on the GSL-SE, but I doubt they are really any heavier (and the difference would not be significant to the total weight of the car if there is a difference there).

If you are going to compare the weights on the cars, you need to compare apples to apples. There is a big difference between the S and a loaded GSL in terms of weight, but not much difference between a loaded GSL and a GSL-SE. Plus, you got a signicant increase in power, torque, and a wider powerband with those few extra pounds on the GSL-SE model. If you are wanting light, start with a basic S model and go from there.

Edit: Also the S3 GSL and GSL-SE could be had with or without power steering.
I was reading down the thread and thinking the same thing you posted. AC system has to be at least 30 lbs.
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2009 | 12:47 AM
  #24  
martinhickey's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
From: Oregon
...that's why mine's gone!
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2009 | 08:04 AM
  #25  
ported12at's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 356
Likes: 0
From: Augusta, Ga.
Originally Posted by martinhickey
...that's why mine's gone!

Mine too! Along with....

power steering
stock pulleys (replaced with gilmer drive setup)
pop up headlights (working on flush mounts)
Storage bins
rear carpet
all trim inside the rear cargo area (painted to match body color)
stock seats (replaced with 18lb cobra misano knock offs)
power antenna
stock dash and frame behind it. (working on fiberglass dash)
Rear bumper (working on a diffuser)
stock clarion setup
power mirrors (replaced with aluminum ray dots)
stock shifter (replaced with billet short shifter)
side molding
spare tire
stock exhaust
rats nest
stock radiator (lighter aluminum)
stock fan (lighter electric)
misc. shrouds, trim

There are a few more odds & ends, including about 20lbs of leftover bolts that I won't reuse. When all is said and done, I hope to be around 2000lbs. I do have a 6pt. cage and a few things that will replace some of the weight taken out.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:30 PM.