1st Generation Specific (1979-1985) 1979-1985 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections

1st gen with 5.0 on ebay

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 15, 2004 | 02:59 PM
  #26  
BIG J MIXALOT's Avatar
SHSHSHA POCKET SAND
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 611
Likes: 0
From: Monroe Wa
we should get a mustang and put a rotary in it
Reply
Old May 15, 2004 | 03:15 PM
  #27  
agentorange's Avatar
'82 GSL '05 SRT-4
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 236
Likes: 0
From: Spokane, WA
Yeah, it does look nice but it still defeats the purpose of the title Rx-7.

The only way I would put a V8 in a 7 is if it was going to be a dragster.
Reply
Old May 15, 2004 | 03:35 PM
  #28  
enigma32's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 686
Likes: 0
From: Central New York
Originally posted by BIG J MIXALOT
we should get a mustang and put a rotary in it
If I had the $$$ I'd so jump on that
Reply
Old May 15, 2004 | 03:39 PM
  #29  
Eville140's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
From: Evansville, IN
I must say, I have a piston rx and I like it alot. That is a very clean swap. The wheels are ugly, and the hood is horible and it sits up way to high.
Also 400hp and stock 19# injectors is just not going to happen no matter many polished parts you have.

Later
Randy
Reply
Old May 15, 2004 | 03:40 PM
  #30  
peejay's Avatar
Old [Sch|F]ool
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 12,865
Likes: 572
From: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Originally posted by Super_13B
Yeah, it does look nice but it still defeats the purpose of the title Rx-7.

The only way I would put a V8 in a 7 is if it was going to be a dragster.
I'd put one in a RX-7 for road course work.

If I cared about that anymore.

A V8 for Rallycross is a bit... extreme. More than about 200-250hp is just too much for a 2WD. What is needed is a nice, fat, looooong powerband, which conveniently enough the rotary can deliver.
Reply
Old May 15, 2004 | 05:05 PM
  #31  
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 214
Likes: 0
From: boynton beach , florida
those wheels just dont fit the car
Reply
Old May 15, 2004 | 07:25 PM
  #32  
sweetege's Avatar
bzzzzzzzzzzzzz
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 418
Likes: 0
From: Cookeville, TN
did anybody else notice the budweiser can on directfreaks first picture. it might jus be me but i would'nt want beer spilt all over that engine... Or would I......HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA ha
Reply
Old May 15, 2004 | 08:05 PM
  #33  
g prime's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 352
Likes: 0
From: Canada
Canada has its share of rednecks - we keep them in Alberta
Hey now.... Oh wait its true.
Reply
Old May 15, 2004 | 09:05 PM
  #34  
V8kilr's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,441
Likes: 5
From: Troy,Mi
Originally posted by sweetege
did anybody else notice the budweiser can on directfreaks first picture. it might jus be me but i would'nt want beer spilt all over that engine... Or would I......HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA ha

I just e-mailed him and asked if it came with the car.

I said if it does then the asking price is starting to look real nice

LMAO
Reply
Old May 15, 2004 | 09:17 PM
  #35  
MosesX605's Avatar
My wife bought me 2 RX-7s
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,328
Likes: 3
From: Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
I would think that after all that work the guy would have got some properly spaced rims and some decently thick rubber on the back tires, especially with a claimed 400 hp.

I'm also calling the BS flag in on the claimed 2200 pound weight of the car with full interior, heavier suspension components and a motor that is the equivalent of 2 12As.

Other than that, the motor install is very nice indeed and aside from the silly cowl hood, the car looks nice and clean.

Just not my bag...
Reply
Old May 16, 2004 | 12:14 AM
  #36  
mustang85GT's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
From: orange
i think he put that huge cowl on, cuz of hood clearance. the intake manifold prolly hits the hood when shut. and his huge price tag, is prolly labor that he added to make it seem like a steal.

~Steve
Reply
Old May 16, 2004 | 12:25 AM
  #37  
Directfreak's Avatar
I am a Jeeper Now.
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 9,371
Likes: 4
From: 3OH5
Check out this one - with an Integra front bumper.




It's hard to tell in the pictures, but it lokgs good from these angles. Definately gives it a modern twist.

It's here on ebay too.
Reply
Old May 16, 2004 | 12:41 AM
  #38  
Rx-7Addict's Avatar
Rotary Powered
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 2,272
Likes: 1
From: Chicago, IL
I love V8s

much more awesomer than rortary
Reply
Old May 16, 2004 | 08:27 AM
  #39  
mar3's Avatar
Administrator
Tenured Member: 25 Years
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 12,974
Likes: 62
From: So. Arlington, TX!!!
Originally posted by Rx-7Addict

I love V8s

much more awesomer than rortary
What's a "rortary"? BTW, nice MX-6 in your avatar...

Reply
Old May 16, 2004 | 12:18 PM
  #40  
Rx-7Addict's Avatar
Rotary Powered
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 2,272
Likes: 1
From: Chicago, IL
Originally posted by mar3
What's a "rortary"? BTW, nice MX-6 in your avatar...

haha what can I say but it was 1:45 AM on Sunday (saturday night)

Reply
Old May 16, 2004 | 01:02 PM
  #41  
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
From: The South
Welll..I'd like to have it. I have always been interested in a 5.0 in an RX just for fun. I'm sure the reserve is out there however, I wonder if he is just showing off his car and not serious about selling.

Something isnt making loigical sense.

But never-the-less I'd sure love to just see how it drives. It looks serious, personally i bet it would be a blast.

Im still a hard core purist with my SA's ( to the point opf keeping them totally stock..period)...but dont think i'd even look at that one as a RX, just a modified sports car, with a rx body.
Reply
Old May 16, 2004 | 01:15 PM
  #42  
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
From: The South
On that brown 83 the tranny isnt classified, so maybe troubles there...everything is rated average cept that
Reply
Old May 16, 2004 | 01:25 PM
  #43  
agentorange's Avatar
'82 GSL '05 SRT-4
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 236
Likes: 0
From: Spokane, WA
I'm with MosesX605 that car can't weight 2200 lbs. especially with that V8 in it.

And if I was going to make a road car I would leave the rotary in it... after all this is a ROTARY Community. hahaha
Reply
Old May 16, 2004 | 01:29 PM
  #44  
agentorange's Avatar
'82 GSL '05 SRT-4
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 236
Likes: 0
From: Spokane, WA
There weight is 2400 lbs. stock and he droped in a 5.0 with all of that extra ****... I'm saying it weighs at least 3000 lbs.
Reply
Old May 16, 2004 | 01:45 PM
  #45  
FirstGen7's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
From: Richmond
Wow, that '83 looks absolutely beautiful...

Not sure about how it runs, but damn, it's gorgeous on the outside, and the interior part of the inside, :-P
Reply
Old May 16, 2004 | 02:16 PM
  #46  
The_Dude's Avatar
TT 1st gen ? We'll see !
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 328
Likes: 0
From: Ottawa, Canada
Originally posted by Mills
The auction for the '83 says automatic when it's clearly a 5-speed. That is a sweet car. The seats match the ones in later '84-'85 cars, but tan wasn't available in an SE like mine

Hmmmm....
it also says 2.0 L when it's clearly a 12A ... :P *right * :P
Reply
Old May 16, 2004 | 03:03 PM
  #47  
Manntis's Avatar
add to cart
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 4,181
Likes: 0
From: Saskatoon, SK & Montreal, PQ
Originally posted by KC Shaw
I'm sure the reserve is out there however, I wonder if he is just showing off his car and not serious about selling.
Like I said on page 1, he wants at least $25,000 for it.

And the listing was posted on his behalf through a dealer - he seriously expects to sell it.
Reply
Old May 16, 2004 | 03:37 PM
  #48  
peejay's Avatar
Old [Sch|F]ool
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 12,865
Likes: 572
From: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Originally posted by Super_13B
There weight is 2400 lbs. stock and he droped in a 5.0 with all of that extra ****... I'm saying it weighs at least 3000 lbs.
The 302 is a remarkably lightweight engine. It was designed with thinwall casting technology in mind, and Ford lightened it up even further. A bare 5.0 block weighs about 135lb. Ford switch to 50-oz/in imbalance (around the time of the switch to the 5.0 name) mainly so they could use less iron in the crankshaft. Less iron = less weight (although the 50oz-in cranks have a habit of braking at sustained high RPM). And there is a lot of weight to lose on the engine as well... the difference between aluminum heads and iron heads is *shocking*. You can swing aluminum heads around on one finger.

Plus, the rotary is a lot heavier than it looks.
Reply
Old May 16, 2004 | 04:38 PM
  #49  
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
From: The South
thanks Manntis , i see that guy is selling more then one car now. Still a lot of work to turn around and sell moment you get on the road.
Reply
Old May 16, 2004 | 07:17 PM
  #50  
mar3's Avatar
Administrator
Tenured Member: 25 Years
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 12,974
Likes: 62
From: So. Arlington, TX!!!
Originally posted by peejay

The 302 is a remarkably lightweight engine. It was designed with thinwall casting technology in mind, and Ford lightened it up even further. A bare 5.0 block weighs about 135lb. Ford switch to 50-oz/in imbalance (around the time of the switch to the 5.0 name) mainly so they could use less iron in the crankshaft. Less iron = less weight (although the 50oz-in cranks have a habit of braking at sustained high RPM). And there is a lot of weight to lose on the engine as well... the difference between aluminum heads and iron heads is *shocking*. You can swing aluminum heads around on one finger.

Plus, the rotary is a lot heavier than it looks.
With accessories, it's still heavier than a 12A non-turbo, though, right?


Originally posted by KC Shaw

Welll..I'd like to have it. I have always been interested in a 5.0 in an RX just for fun. I'm sure the reserve is out there however, I wonder if he is just showing off his car and not serious about selling.

Something isnt making loigical sense.

But never-the-less I'd sure love to just see how it drives. It looks serious, personally i bet it would be a blast.

On that, you can be sure. 400 HP through a rear two wheel drive platform means you'll constantly be fighting the fishtail effect unless you miss the corner apex completely because the "deer-strapped-to-the-hood" effect of the extra weight up front overwhelms the grip of the pathetically small tires up front...

And the rear tires being that small means you'll just be doing smokey burn-outs anyway every time you try to "race" somebody....
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:14 AM.