Wolf 3D Discuss the Wolf 3D Engine Management System

Wolf 3D V4 Load Table psi values

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 9, 2004 | 01:19 AM
  #1  
eViLRotor's Avatar
Thread Starter
Brother of the Rotary
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 5,781
Likes: 2
From: Arkham Asylum
V4 Load Table psi values

I've been reading the V4 Manual quite a bit, still deciding whether to upgrade my V3.1 to a V4, or go Haltech.

One thing I like about the Wolf is that the load bands are scalable, depending on what your max boost is. But the thing I can't figure out is what PSI each load band represents. 107 is 23 psi, 100 is 20 psi.

So am I safe to assume that each load band represents 3 psi and that 0psi is 50% load?

That would be a lot of Vacuum bands..my v3.1 only had 2 in 21 psi mode!!!!

Last edited by eViLRotor; Nov 9, 2004 at 01:21 AM.
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2004 | 09:22 AM
  #2  
nyt's Avatar
nyt
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,259
Likes: 4
From: long island
0psi is actually 43 =]
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2004 | 11:25 AM
  #3  
eViLRotor's Avatar
Thread Starter
Brother of the Rotary
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 5,781
Likes: 2
From: Arkham Asylum
Ok, thanks

So lets say you scale your 100% load band to be 15 psi. 43% still remains 0 psi, and you would could increase your tuning resolution under boost?
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2004 | 12:06 PM
  #4  
nyt's Avatar
nyt
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,259
Likes: 4
From: long island
i dont know if 43 still stays at 0... i havent scaled it

if i recall 86 is about 15 psi if you use the default scale
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2004 | 08:44 PM
  #5  
Evil Aviator's Avatar
Rotorhead
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 9,136
Likes: 39
From: Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
If you are trying to match the load bands to your boost gauge, it's never going to work out correctly because the boost gauge is psig and the load bands are based on psia.

I think you are reading too much into this.
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2004 | 10:57 PM
  #6  
nyt's Avatar
nyt
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,259
Likes: 4
From: long island
... i go by what the wolf says
it does have min/max datalog, i see where it is at what boost level by that.. and its easy to tell 0psi, just dont run the car
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2004 | 11:02 PM
  #7  
enzo250's Avatar
IRS Champion
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,038
Likes: 1
From: NY
They should just have the load axis as kpa.
it would make it much easier for all, at least that's what i'm used to.
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2004 | 11:11 PM
  #8  
nyt's Avatar
nyt
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,259
Likes: 4
From: long island
that'd be great but its setup to be programmed for any kind of external sensor.... wouldn't exactly work that way....
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2004 | 11:13 PM
  #9  
enzo250's Avatar
IRS Champion
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,038
Likes: 1
From: NY
Its possible as many other ecu's already do this...
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2004 | 12:05 AM
  #10  
nyt's Avatar
nyt
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,259
Likes: 4
From: long island
yeah i suppose it could. wouldnt be that hard.. i think they just did that with their old ecus and kept it.. ah well it doesnt really matter once you know whats what
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2004 | 11:27 AM
  #11  
eViLRotor's Avatar
Thread Starter
Brother of the Rotary
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 5,781
Likes: 2
From: Arkham Asylum
Originally Posted by Evil Aviator
If you are trying to match the load bands to your boost gauge, it's never going to work out correctly because the boost gauge is psig and the load bands are based on psia.

I think you are reading too much into this.
Yeah that's why my Wolf V3.1 always read 2 psi more than everything else? Never liked that too much.

EA, do you know if the 107% band always stays at 23.5 psi, no matter what you scale the other bands too?
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2004 | 06:50 PM
  #12  
Evil Aviator's Avatar
Rotorhead
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 9,136
Likes: 39
From: Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
Originally Posted by enzo250
They should just have the load axis as kpa.
it would make it much easier for all, at least that's what i'm used to.
The Wolf EMS can use MAP, MAF, or TPS to determine load. While kpa may work great for MAP, I think that kpa would be a rather strange value for MAF or TPS.

Also, some EMS products display vacuum and boost load values based on a fixed static value in order to aid their target consumers. Sometimes I wonder if these incorrect values hurt more than they help.

Originally Posted by eViLRotor
EA, do you know if the 107% band always stays at 23.5 psi, no matter what you scale the other bands too?
The way I understand it, the 100% point is the one that you set in the Wolf, and the rest of the points (including the 107% point) are calculated from that value. Therefore, 107% = "23psi" only when you set "20psi" boost as the 100% value.

Originally Posted by eViLRotor
Yeah that's why my Wolf V3.1 always read 2 psi more than everything else? Never liked that too much.
Any MAP-based EMS would need an additional static pressure sensor in order to properly compute boost pressure. Also, your boost gauge and/or MAP sensor could be off.

The V4 Wolf software has a calibration function for its on-screen boost/vacuum gauge so you can set it to your boost gauge if you like.
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2004 | 01:52 AM
  #13  
rotamotive's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
From: sydney,australia
Talking

I dont think the load band settings are difficult at all,whilst you are tuning , if there is a certain point you want to capture,just npress the little S icon with the line through it and it will stop at that point...The load bands are also there as for what evil wrote about using a MAF or TPS. If this was such a bad idea,i dont think the trust E-Manage or the Haltech interceptor would be utilising the same idea...
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2004 | 12:28 PM
  #14  
dcee's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 213
Likes: 0
From: Jersey
Originally Posted by eViLRotor
Yeah that's why my Wolf V3.1 always read 2 psi more than everything else? Never liked that too much.
Mine is off by 2 psi too (Wolf Version 3.1). That always annoyed me. If what you say is true then wouldn't the difference be ~14.3psi (the difference between static & guage pressure, dependant on where you live).
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2004 | 12:32 PM
  #15  
CrackHeadMel's Avatar
Learned alot | Alot to go
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,232
Likes: 0
From: Rotaryland, New Hampshire
IF 107 is 23 psi what is 0? what is it in vacume? I only ask beause I want to set up my Innovate LMA-3 kit to log in the same format for less headaces

-Jacob
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2004 | 02:18 PM
  #16  
eViLRotor's Avatar
Thread Starter
Brother of the Rotary
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 5,781
Likes: 2
From: Arkham Asylum
Originally Posted by CrackHeadMel
IF 107 is 23 psi what is 0? what is it in vacume? I only ask beause I want to set up my Innovate LMA-3 kit to log in the same format for less headaces

-Jacob
0 psi (atmospheric pressure) is usally the Load% that the Wolf HC displays when you turn on the car....on NYT's car 0 psi is 43% Load for example
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2004 | 02:31 PM
  #17  
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
From: FL
think of it as percentages of a maximum that you set. If you set your maxium to 20 psi (which is what i would recommend for any boost application, so no recalibration is needed if you decide to raise the boost) then 100% = 20 and 0 = infinate vaccum. ~43 ends up being atmosphereric, and if you do the math... 100 - 43 = 57 percentages that operate in boost. if you divide that in half, and add it to atmospheric (43 ) then you'll get 10 psi. 57 / 2 = 28.5 , 43 + 28.5 = 71.5

so 71.5 would equal 10psi

85.75 would equal 15 psi

57.25 would equal 5 psi

if you set the maxium to 15 psi, then all of this changes because 100% now is 15 psi, but 0 is still infinate vaccum.

for n/a models you set the maximum to 0psi because you don't ever plan on making boost. you will have 16 different load bands from infinate vaccum to atmopheric.
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2004 | 07:24 PM
  #18  
nyt's Avatar
nyt
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,259
Likes: 4
From: long island
i think 40 might actually be atmosphere.
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2004 | 11:56 PM
  #19  
Eroxx's Avatar
1 OF A KIND T2
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
From: NY
Why not take an air pressure regulator supplied with shop air (from a compressor)
tied in to a gauge,and plug it in to the map. Dial in your pressure and check it thru
wolf interface. this is how i calibrated the gauge, and maped psi to load points!!!
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2005 | 01:14 PM
  #20  
Fatty_FC3S's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 595
Likes: 0
From: Northern California
Upgrade to a 4.0, the 3.1 just doesnt have the control you need to make the car run well in all respects (not enough resolution). You can get a discount if you upgrade to 4.0, and you can pretty much keep most of your 3.1 harness if you like ....
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2005 | 04:41 PM
  #21  
David Hayes's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,510
Likes: 188
From: FL
Originally Posted by Eroxx
Why not take an air pressure regulator supplied with shop air (from a compressor)
tied in to a gauge,and plug it in to the map. Dial in your pressure and check it thru
wolf interface. this is how i calibrated the gauge, and maped psi to load points!!!

I did this and came up with the attached chart.
Attached Files
File Type: txt
boost conversion.txt (285 Bytes, 163 views)
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jeff20B
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
73
Sep 16, 2018 07:16 PM
stickmantijuana
Microtech
6
Nov 21, 2015 10:20 AM
befarrer
Adaptronic Engine Mgmt - AUS
3
Sep 22, 2015 09:33 AM
ZacMan
Build Threads
4
Sep 19, 2015 09:20 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:57 AM.