FD v.s. honda S2000
well the way I see it the FD SHITTY low end torque...........it has none........and if you say the S2K is not as torquey as the FD then it doesn't say much about the S2K.......i know and admit when a car is fast..........the S2K is not fast......
i was going to leave him alone with his daydreaming............if he thinks those cars are fast then let him........I know better. and if by well modified he means Turbo/SC then yes they are fast....otherwise no.
Originally Posted by Madrx7racer
i was going to leave him alone with his daydreaming............if he thinks those cars are fast then let him........I know better. and if by well modified he means Turbo/SC then yes they are fast....otherwise no.
LOFL! I'd like to see an N/A FD beat an N/A S2K. Stock for stock = Neck and neck. FD without turbo = teh humungously ghey
Originally Posted by SERIES7
LOFL! I'd like to see an N/A FD beat an N/A S2K. Stock for stock = Neck and neck. FD without turbo = teh humungously ghey
and i've raced an S2000 before, with intake, dp, and flywheel I put bout 4-5 cars on him by the end of 2nd gear. I babied the start and he launched too. I can upload the vid, but it's not that great.




